1. Group 1: Material Testing Device Jobe Dyson Brie Witherspoon John Chandler Brett Newstead

2. Background Sponsor: Dr. Han from the NHMFL Develop additional materials testing machine based off original plans Original Machine Tests Tensile Properties of Various Materials Problems: –The Original Machine Can Only Pull on The Sample, it Can Not Compress it

3. Scope Materials Testing Machine Purpose –Design Additional Materials Testing Machine Based Off of Existing Plans of Old Machine –New Machine Should Exert Both Tension and Compression on Sample and Be Able To Measure Those Forces Objective –Make Minimal Modifications To Accomplish Goal –Increase Translational Motion; Sample Needs to Be Stretched Further –Add Load Cell To Measure Tension Force and Compressive Force

4. Constraints Operate in 20-Tesla Magnetic Field –Machine Must Work While Inside the Magnet –Brass, Aluminum, Composites are Feasible Options Operate at 4.2 Kelvin –Helium is Used to Lower the Temperature to Near Absolute Zero –Materials Structure Must Withstand This Temperature –Again: Brass, Aluminum, and Composites Will Work Make as Few Changes to Original Machine as Possible Can Not Hang Over Existing Base Plate –Diameter = 143mm Testing Machine Motor

5. Fall Objectives Create as Many Design Ideas as Possible Choose Final Design and Obtain Approval from Sponsor –Create Design Matrix for Final Decision Theoretically Test Final Design –Use FEA Program To Test Materials Choose Load Cell –Find a Load Cell that Meets the Criteria of the Design

6. Design 1 Use Slider to Achieve Tension and Compression Motion One End of Sample is Fixed Problems –Motor Would be Subjected to the Temperature and Magnet –Slider Calculation Must Be Extremely Specific –Motor Must Have Enough Torque to Compress Sample

7. Design 2 Add Second Motor and Gear Box Allow Previously Fixed Block to Move Can Achieve Tension and Compression Problems –May Not Fit on Base Plate –Sample Not Actually Connected to the Base –Would Require Major Alterations to Previous Machine

8. Design 3 Remove “V” Cut Minimize Existing Parts Sizes to Allow for the Insertion of the Load Cell and Increase Translational Motion Problems –Minimizing Parts Sizes May Decrease The Strength –New Design Will Require Some Changes to the Old Design

9. Design 3 Modify “V-cut” Stay In Boundary Minimize Existing Part Size

10. Final Choice Design Matrix That Helped to Chose the Final Design Design 3 Was By Far the Best Choice Dr. Han Agreed With Our Assessment Design #SimplicityCostSafetyLoad CellMeets All Goals Total 1 2233313 2 11533 3 4454522

11. Free Body Diagram THE MACHINE WILL EXERT UNIAXIAL TENSILE AND COMPRESSIVE FORCES ON A SAMPLE OF MATERIAL.

12. New Design Old BlockNew Block Using AutoDesk Inventor Software, the Group Modified the Existing Parts to Meet the Design Criteria Stationary Block:

13. New Design New BlockOld Block Sliding Block:

14. New Design New Holder Old Holder Sample Holder 1

15. New Design New Holder Old Holder Sample Holder 2

16. Stress Tests Dr. Han Stated that the Sample Will Exert a Maximum of 2 kN of Uniaxial Force on the Parts This Chart also Shows that the Strength of Metals Increases in Extreme Colds

17. Stress Tests The Group Used FEA Software that is Built into AutoDesk Inventor to Evaluate Stress/Strain of the Materials This Software Provides Feedback as to Whether the Parts Will Fail Under a Given Load Sample Analysis: Fixed Block Theoretically, the Design is Sound and Dr. Han Also Approved

18. Load Cell A Load Cell Is Required to Measure the Forces on the Sample in the Machine The Sponsor Recommended A.L. Design to the Group A Load Cell was Ordered Based on the Size and Temperature Constraints of the Design The Group Decided to Use a Cylindrical Load Cell

19. Spring Plan Submission of Final Design To Sponsor ASAP Order Materials Needed and the Load Cell Construct/ Assemble Parts –Magnet Lab Machine Shop Will Help Make the Parts –The Group will Assemble the Machine Configure and Test Load Cell Test Final Assembly –The Group Wants to Test the Machine in the Magnet –Due to Budget/ Time Constraints, this May Not Be Possible –At a Minimum, the Group Wants to Make Sure the Machine Responds as Expected in an Open Air Environment

20. Success/ Failure In Order For This Project To Be Considered Successful, It Must: –Fit In The Designated Cylinder –Exert Tension and Compression on Sample –Stretch Sample Further Than Previous Machine –Operate In 4.2 Kelvin and In Magnetic Field* *This Criteria Depends on Receiving Magnet Time, and May Not Determine Overall Success.

21. Major Problems The Magnet Lab Machine Shop Was Overbooked and Unable to Work On the Group’s Project Until April Unable to Order All the Materials Due to a Frozen Budget The Load Cell Contact Fell Through, Leaving no Time to Shop for a Replacement Load Cell A Majority of the Parts Are Way too Complicated for the Group to Construct

22. Revised Spring Plan The Group Decided the Best Option Was to Machine the Most Critical Parts Themselves The Stationary and Sliding Blocks Were Determined to be the Most Critical to the Overall Design Dr. Han Will Obtain a Replacement Load Cell The Group Will Use the Engineering School Machine Shop to Make the Parts Testing –A Successful Test Will Require the Parts Fitting on the Existing Base Plate and the Sliding Block Moving When the Gear Turns

23. Testing The Group Was Able to Complete the Critical Parts to the Best of Their Abilities –The Machine Shop at the School did not Have the Right Equipment to Make the More Complicated Cuts The Parts Fit on the Base and Moved In a Translational Motion Unfortunately, the Load Cell was not Able to Be Tested as a Sample Material Could Not be Attached to the Machine Dr. Han Considered the Design and Test a Success and Was Very Pleased With the Groups Accomplishments

24. Mag Lab Plan When They Get the Time, the Magnet Lab Will Complete the Machining of the Parts Theoretically, the Design Will Work as Planned Dr. Han Will Test the Machine For: –Increased Translational Motion –Operation in the Magnet Environment –Correct Force Exertion –Correct Operation of the Load Cell

25. What We Learned Nothing Happens as Expected Murphy’s Law Choose Parts Suppliers Carefully Time Management is Crucial You Can Not Always Get The Project as Complete as You Want in the Time Given