Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Progress in the development of national baseline scenarios M. Amann, J. Borken, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute.

Published byNatalie Barber Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Progress in the development of national baseline scenarios M. Amann, J. Borken, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute."— Presentation transcript:

1 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Progress in the development of national baseline scenarios M. Amann, J. Borken, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Working Group on Strategies, Geneva, April 12-15, 2010

2 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Contents Available scenarios Comparison of base year emission inventories Key assumptions in national projections Environmental impacts Conclusions

3 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Data sources of draft national projections for Gothenburg Protocol revision: energy National scenariosIEA WEO 2009PRIMES 2008 C&E (NEC report #6) Austria (transport only)AlbaniaBelgiumLatvia CroatiaBelarusBulgariaLithuania Czech RepublicBosnia-H.CyprusLuxembourg DenmarkMoldovaEstoniaMalta FinlandRussiaFrancePoland GreeceSerbiaGermanyRomania IrelandUkraineHungarySlovakia ItalyTurkeySlovenia NetherlandsTFYROM (PRIMES2009) Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland UK

4 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Data sources of draft national projections for Gothenburg Protocol revision: Agricultural projections National scenariosFAO outlook 2003CAPRI 2009 projections AustriaBelarusBelgiumLatvia CroatiaMoldovaBulgariaLithuania FinlandRussiaCyprusLuxembourg IrelandTurkeyCzech RepublicMalta ItalyUkraineDenmarkNorway NetherlandsEstoniaPoland RomaniaFranceSlovenia SlovakiaGermanyPortugal SpainHungary SwedenGreece Switzerland UK

5 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Review process Activity data, emission factors and resulting emissions were prepared for review: http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/index.php/policyapplications/ gothenburg-protocol-revision Additional comments and material sent by 18 countries have been implemented by February 2010. Most countries that have sent national scenarios provided also info on control strategies (e.g., national interpretation of flexibilities in the Commission's proposal for IED). Transport emission factors and assumptions about turnover for all EU and EFTA countries based on COPERT IV model. Further feedbacks invited for March 15, but many countries commented after this date. Not all of these comments are already implemented.

6 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at State of play on country comments No. CountryLast commentsStatus 1 Austria24.03.Not implemented (sent data on activities and em. factors but not in GAINS format) 2 Belgium17.03Implemented 3 Croatia19.03.Not implemented (suggested further corrections to control strategies) 4 Czech Rep.23.03.Not implemented (suggested corrections to PM emission factors) 5 Finland03.03.Implemented 6 France24.03.Implemented (IIASA responded, no concrete suggestions for changes) 7 Greece26.03.Not implemented (suggested further corrections to em. factors and control strategies) 8 Hungary24.03.Not implemented (sent data on activities and em. factors but not in GAINS format) 9 Ireland16.03.Implemented 10 Malta23.03.Implemented (IIASA responded, no concrete suggestions for changes) 11 Norway17.03.Implemented 12 Portugal02.02.Implemented 13 Romania01.04.Not implemented (sent projection of coal use in the power sector) 14 Slovakia23.03.Not implemented (sent inconsistent national energy scenario - large discrepancies with statistics) 15 Spain23.03.Not implemented (not analyzed: newest em. inventory and comparison with national projection) 16 Sweden22.03.Implemented 17 Switzerland17.03Implemented 18 UK31.03.Implemented

7 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Base year inventory for 2005 For many countries there are disagreements between national and IEA energy statistics Two versions in GAINS: –National scenario: use of national statistics –PRIMES scenario: use of IEA/PRIMES statistics There are differences between national inventories reported to CEIP and GAINS estimates –National inventories are moving targets as national inventories for 2000 and 2005 keep changing –Main reasons for disagreement: Different energy/activity statistics Missing sources in national inventories GAINS uses COPERT emission factors Insufficient communication with national experts

8 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Emission estimates for 2000 and 2005 GAINS estimates (draft) vs. CEIP Aug2009 inventory PROVISIONAL RESULTS SO 2 NO x NH 3 VOC

9 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at PM2.5 emission estimates for 2000 and 2005 GAINS estimates (draft) vs. CEIP Aug2009 inventory PROVISIONAL RESULTS PM2.5

10 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Comparison of assumed GDP growth between 2005 and 2020

11 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Comparison of oil prices assumed in national scenarios for 2020

12 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Comparison of carbon prices assumed for 2020 National scenarios vs. PRIMES C&E package

13 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emission projections National projections: Energy 1.National scenarios, if available 2.PRIMES 2008 Climate & Energy Package, if available 3.IEA World Energy Outlook 2009 Agriculture 1.National agricultural projections, if available 2.CAPRI projections 3.FAO 2008 projections PRIMES 2009 baseline (basis for envisaged NEC proposal): Energy 1.PRIMES 2009 baseline, if available (current national energy and energy policies, no full achievement of C&E package targets) 2.IEA World Energy Outlook 2009 Agriculture 1.CAPRI projections 2.FAO 2008 projections + Current policies on air pollution (national policies + advanced EU proposals)

14 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Assumed GDP growth in National and PRIMES scenarios National scenarios assume higher GDP growth than PRIMES2009

15 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emissions projections for 2020 PROVISIONAL RESULTS

16 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emission projections for 2020 SO 2 PROVISIONAL RESULTS

17 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emission projections for 2020 NO x PROVISIONAL RESULTS

18 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emission projections for 2020 NH 3 PROVISIONAL RESULTS

19 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emission projections for 2020 VOC PROVISIONAL RESULTS

20 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Baseline emission projections for 2020 PM2.5 PROVISIONAL RESULTS

21 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Loss in statistical life expectancy PROVISIONAL RESULTS

22 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Excess of CL for acidification in forest soils PROVISIONAL RESULTS

23 http://gains.iiasa.ac.at Conclusions National projections received from 18 countries. There are differences in statistical data for 2000 and 2005 between national and international statistics. Implications for emission ceilings? National scenarios do not employ internationally coherent assumptions on economic development, climate policy, oil prices, etc. While for some countries differences in emission projections between national projections and PRIMES2009 are significant, differences in calculated environmental impacts are limited.

Download ppt "Progress in the development of national baseline scenarios M. Amann, J. Borken, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute."

Similar presentations

M. Amann, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes. Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, W. Winiwarter The CAFE baseline scenarios: Emission projections.

M. Amann, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes. Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, W. Winiwarter The CAFE baseline scenarios: Emission projections.
IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.

IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.

Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,

State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
1 Emission data needs for international reporting and assessments Joint UNECE and EIONET workshop on emission inventories and projections 6-8 May 2002,

1 Emission data needs for international reporting and assessments Joint UNECE and EIONET workshop on emission inventories and projections 6-8 May 2002,
Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.

Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.
The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe. The Problem Svante Oden (1968): “The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences.” SOx, NOx -> transported.

Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe. The Problem Svante Oden (1968): “The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences.” SOx, NOx -> transported.
Development of the NEC baseline scenario State of play Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Development of the NEC baseline scenario State of play Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)

The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
Agenda Markus Amann Methodology Fabian Wagner Initial results for emissions from energy use and industrial activities Ian McCallum Estimates of mitigation.

Agenda Markus Amann Methodology Fabian Wagner Initial results for emissions from energy use and industrial activities Ian McCallum Estimates of mitigation.
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
European Environment Agency 11 th Joint EIONET/TFEIP meeting, 10-11 May 2010, Larnaca Recent WGSR discussions concerning baseline scenarios for the Gothenburg.

European Environment Agency 11 th Joint EIONET/TFEIP meeting, May 2010, Larnaca Recent WGSR discussions concerning baseline scenarios for the Gothenburg.
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.

M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.

1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
Brussels, 1-2 September 2004 Improving Air Quality in the enlarged EU: Workshop on Plans and Programmes of Air Quality and National Emission Ceilings Directives.

Brussels, 1-2 September 2004 Improving Air Quality in the enlarged EU: Workshop on Plans and Programmes of Air Quality and National Emission Ceilings Directives.
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.

European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.

European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.

Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.

Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google