Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTheodore Sullivan Modified over 9 years ago
1
GENOPT A Program that Writes User-Friendly Optimization Code David Bushnell International Journal of Solids & Structures, Vol. 26, No. 9/10, pp. 1173-1210, 1990
3
SUMMARY OF TALK Purpose Properties of GENOPT Two kinds of user: (a) GENOPT user and (b) end user GENOPT commands GENOPT architecture Example 1: Minimum-weight design of a plate Example 2: Minimum-weight design of an isogrid-stiffened spherical shell Example 3: Minimum-weight design of a ring-stiffened, wavy-walled cylindrical shell with use of BIGBOSOR4 Example 4: Minimum-weight design of an isogrid-stiffened ellipsoidal shell with use of BIGBOSOR4
4
PURPOSES OF GENOPT Convert an analysis into a user-friendly analysis Make the step into the world of automated optimization easy
5
PROPERTIES OF GENOPT An analysis of a fixed design is “automatically” converted into an optimization of that design concept. GENOPT can be applied in any field. It is not limited to structural analysis. User-specified data names and one-line definitions appear throughout the output. Hence the input and output is in the jargon of the GENOPT-user’s field. GENOPT is a FORTRAN program that writes other FORTRAN programs.
6
ARCHITECTURE OF GENOPT The program system generated by GENOPT has the “BEGIN”, “DECIDE”, “MAINSETUP”, “OPTIMIZE”, “SUPEROPT”, “CHANGE”, “CHOOSEPLOT”, “CLEANUP” architecture typical of other software written by the author for specific applications (BOSOR4, BIGBOSOR4, BOSOR5, PANDA, PANDA2)
7
Structural analysis, optimization
8
“Window” size v. design iterations
9
TWO TYPES OF USER GENOPT USER: Uses GENOPT to create a user-friendly system of programs for optimizing a class of objects. END USER: Uses the user-friendly system of programs created by the GENOPT user to optimize objects in the class covered by the GENOPT USER’s program system.
10
ROLE OF THE GENOPT USER(1) Choose a generic class of problems for which a user- friendly analysis and/or optimization program is needed. Decide which phenomena (behaviors) may affect the design. These are called “behavioral constraints”. Examples: stress, buckling, modal vibration, displacement, clearance. Establish the objective of the optimization. Examples: minimum weight, minimum cost, minimum surface rms error, etc.
11
ROLE OF THE GENOPT USER(2) Organize the input data. Simple constants? Arrays?, Tabular data?, Decision variables? For each input datum choose: (a) a meaningful name, (b) a clear one-line definition, (c) supporting “help” paragraph(s). Write or “borrow” algorithms to predict various behaviors, such as buckling, modal vibration, and stress, that may affect the evolution of the design during optimization cycles. Test the new user-friendly program system. Interact with the END USER.
12
ROLE OF THE END USER(1) Choose a specific problem that fits within the generic class established by the GENOPT USER. Choose an initial design with appropriate loads and an allowable and a factor of safety for each behavior. Choose appropriate decision variables with appropriate lower and upper bounds. Choose linked variables and linking expressions (equality constraints), if any. (These are chosen by the END USER in the processor called “DECIDE”).
13
ROLE OF THE END USER(2) Choose inequality constraints, if any. (To be chosen by the END USER in “DECIDE”). During optimization use enough restarts, iterations, and “CHANGE” commands in the search for a global optimum design. (This is now done automatically by “SUPEROPT”). Interact with the GENOPT USER. Check the optimum design via general-purpose programs and/or tests.
14
THE GENOPT MENU OF COMMANDS(1) Command for the GENOPT USER and the END USER: GENOPTLOG (activates the GENOPT menu of commands). Commands for the GENOPT USER: GENTEXT (GENOPT USER generates a prompt file with “help” paragraphs. GENTEXT produces FORTRAN program fragments, some complete FORTRAN programs, and two “skeletal” FORTRAN subroutines to be “fleshed out” later by the GENOPT user.) GENPROGRAMS (GENOPT USER generates executable elements: BEGIN, DECIDE, MAINSETUP, OPTIMIZE, CHANGE, STORE, CHOOSEPLOT, DIPLOT). INSERT (GENOPT USER adds parameters, if necessary). CLEANGEN (GENOPT user cleans up GENeric case files).
15
THE GENOPT MENU OF COMMANDS(2) Commands for the END USER: BEGIN (END USER provides initial design, material properties, loads, allowables, and factors of safety). DECIDE (END USER chooses decision variables, bounds, linked variables, inequality constraints, and escape variables). MAINSETUP (END USER sets up strategy parameters for simple analysis of a fixed design or optimization). OPTIMIZE (END USER performs the analysis or optimization). SUPEROPT (END USER tries to find a “global” optimum). CHANGE (END USER changes some variables).
16
THE GENOPT MENU OF COMMANDS(3) CHOOSEPLOT (END USER chooses which decision variables to plot versus design iterations). DIPLOT (END USER obtains postscript plot files for margins and/or decision variables and the objective versus design iterations). CLEANSPEC (END USER cleans up SPECific case files).
17
SEVEN ROLES THAT VARIABLES PLAY 1. A possible decision variable for optimization, typically a dimension of a structure. 2. A constant parameter (cannot vary as the design evolves), typically a control integer or material property, but not a load, allowable, or factor of safety, which are asked for later. 3. A parameter characterizing the environment, such as a load component or a temperature. 4. A quantity that describes the response (behavior) of the structure to its environment, (e.g. maximum stress, buckling load, natural frequency, maximum displacement). 5. An allowable, such as maximum allowable stress. 6. A factor of safety. 7. The objective, for example, weight.
21
SEVEN ROLES OF “plate” VARIABLES
22
SEVEN ROLES OF “plate” VARIABLES (cont’d)
24
EXECUTION OF GENTEXT (continued)…
26
EXECUTION OF GENTEXT (continued)
27
EXECUTION OF GENTEXT (continued)…
31
EXECUTION OF GENTEXT (concluded)
32
FILES PRODUCED BY GENTEXT
33
Plate.INP file generated by GENTEXT
34
PART OF THE plate.DEF FILE: a glossary
35
THIS GLOSSARY IS GENERATED BY GENTEXT
36
THE PROMPTING FILE, plate.PRO, produced by GENTEXT
37
PROMPTING FILE CREATED BY GENTEXT (continued)…
39
PROMPTING FILE CREATED BY GENTEXT (concluded).
40
FORTRAN FILE, plate.CON, created by GENTEXT
41
FORTRAN FILE, plate.CON, CREATED BY GENTEXT (cont’d)..
44
FORTRAN FILE, plate.CON, CREATED BY GENTEXT (end)
45
SOME IMPORTANT NOTES, ESPECIALLY CONCERNING “BEHAVIORAL CONSTRAINT” AND “MARGIN”
46
PART OF THE BEHAVIOR.NEW FILE CREATED BY GENTEXT
47
LABELLED COMMON BLOCKS CREATED BY GENTEXT, plate.COM:
48
GENOPT USER WRITTEN CODE INSERTED IN SUB. BEHX1
49
GENOPT USER WRITTEN CODE INSERTED IN SUB. BEHX2
50
TABLES OF PLATE BUCKLING LOAD COEFFICIENTS CAN BE FOUND IN BOOKS SUCH AS THIS…
51
BUCKLING OF PLATE IN AXIAL COMPRESSION: COEFAX Called KAXL(i) in BEHX2
52
GENOPT USER WRITTEN CODE INSERTED IN SUB. BEHX3
53
GENOPT USER WRITTEN CODE INSERTED INTO SUB. BEHX4
54
GENOPT USER WRITTEN CODE INSERTED INTO SUBROUTINE OBJECT, WEIGHT OF THE PLATE
55
SOME NOTES APPENDED TO TABLE 6 ON P.1193 OF THE IJSS PAPER ON GENOPT:
56
RUNSTREAM FOR OBTAINING AN OPTIMUM DESIGN
57
GENPROGRAMS CREATES THESE EXECUTABLE FILES BEGIN(end user supplies starting design, loads, etc.) DECIDE(end user chooses decision variables, bounds, equality and inequality constraints, etc.) MAINSETUP(end user chooses analysis type, which behaviors to process, how many design iterations, etc.) CHANGE(end user can change values of variables.) AUTOCHANGE (automatic random change in decision variables; used by SUPEROPT.)
58
GENPROGRAMS CREATES THESE EXECUTABLE FILES (continued) CHOOSEPLOT (end user chooses what variables to plot v. design iterations.) OPTIMIZE (end user launches the mainprocessor run, either analysis of a fixed design or optimization or design sensitivity analysis.) STORE (variables, margins, objective for all design iterations are stored for display in the *.OPP file.)
59
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “BEGIN”
60
EXECUTION OF “BEGIN” (continued)…
61
PART OF THE FILE, plate1.BEG, GENERATED BY “BEGIN”
62
THE ENTIRE plate1. BEG FILE (p. 1 input data for “begin”)
63
THE ENTIRE plate1. BEG FILE (p. 2 input data for “begin”)
64
THE ENTIRE plate1. BEG FILE (p. 3 input data for “begin”)
65
THE plate1. OPB FILE (p. 1 output from “begin”)
66
THE plate1. OPB FILE (p. 2 output from “begin”)
67
THE plate1. OPB FILE (p. 3 output from “begin”)
68
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE”
69
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 2)
70
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 3)
71
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 4)
72
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 5)
73
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 6)
74
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 7)
75
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “DECIDE” (p. 8)
76
THE FILE, plate1.DEC, GENERATED BY “DECIDE”
77
THE FILE, plate1.OPT, GENERATED BY “MAINSETUP”
78
EXECUTION OF THE PROCESSOR CALLED “OPTIMIZE”
79
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE”: THE plate1.OPM file (p.2)
80
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE”: THE plate1.OPM file (p.3)
81
EXECUTION OF “OPTIMIZE” (continued)… Output omitted in order to save space
82
EXECUTION OF “OPTIMIZE” (concluded)
83
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE/STORE”: THE plate1.OPP file (p. 1)
84
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE/STORE”: THE plate1.OPP file (p. 2)
85
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE/STORE”: THE plate1.OPP file (p. 3)
86
A PLOT OBTAINED VIA “CHOOSEPLOT” AND “DIPLOT”
87
RESULTS FROM THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF GENOPT
88
ANOTHER PLOT OBTAINED VIA “CHOOSEPLOT”/”DIPLOT”
89
RESULTS FROM THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF GENOPT
90
ANOTHER PLOT OBTAINED VIA “CHOOSEPLOT”/”DIPLOT”
91
RESULTS FROM THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF GENOPT
92
A NEW PROBLEM: MINIMUM-WEIGHT DESIGN OF AN INTERNALLY ISOGRID-STIFFENED SPHERICAL SHELL UNDER UNIFORM EXTERNAL PRESSURE
93
FOR DETAILS, SEE LOCKHEED REPORT F372046, Jan.1990, “SPHERE” - Program for minimum-weight design of isogrid- stiffened spherical shells under uniform external pressure
94
REFERENCES IN THE LOCKEED REPORT F372046, January 15, 1990, “SPHERE” - Program for…”
95
CURVE USED TO CREATE TABLE OF KNOCKDOWN FACTORS v. IMPERFECTION AMPLITUDE FOR GENERAL BUCKLING OF ISOGRID-STIFFENED SHELL
96
MODELS FOR LOCAL BUCKLING OF SHELL SKIN
97
CURVE WITH DISCRETE POINTS SELECTED FOR TABLE OF LOCAL BUCKLING OF IMPERFECT SPHERICAL CAP v. “SHALLOWNESS” PARAMETER, LAMBDA
98
GLOSSARY OF USER-NAMED and USER-DEFINED VARIABLES in the GENERIC PROBLEM CALLED “SPHERE”
99
GLOSSARY FOR THE GENERIC PROBLEM, “SPHERE” (continued and concluded)
101
PART OF THE sphere.PRO FILE CREATED BY GENTEXT
102
“SKELETAL” BEHAVIOR.NEW FILE and BEHXi, I=1 to 5 SUBROUTINES TO BE “FLESHED OUT” BY THE USER
103
RUNSTREAM FOR OPTIMIZING THE SPECIFIC CASE, WHICH IS CALLED “sphere3”
104
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE/STORE”: THE sphere3.OPP file (p. 1)
105
OUTPUT FROM “OPTIMIZE/STORE”: THE sphere3.OPP file (p. 2)
106
PLOT OF OBJECTIVE (WEIGHT) OF “sphere3” DURING OPTIMIZATION CYCLES
107
PLOTS OF “sphere3” SKIN THICKNESS AND ISOGRID STIFFENER THICKNESS v. DESIGN ITERATIONS
108
PLOTS OF “sphere3” HEIGHT OF ISOGRID STIFFENING AND SPACING OF ISOGRID STIFFENERS v. ITERATIONS
109
MARGINS v. DESIGN ITERATIONS FOR “sphere3”
110
MARGINS FROM LATEST VERSION OF GENOPT: “sphere3”
111
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE IN WHICH BIGBOSOR4 IS USED TO DO THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. HENCE, THERE IS A SIZABLE DATA BASE Also see, AIAA Paper AIAA-2000-1663 (same title as above), 41st AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Meeting, April 2000
112
SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROBLEM
113
VARIOUS “WAVY-WALLED” CYLINDRICAL SHELLS, “WAVYCYL”
114
LOADING AND BEHAVIORS The loading is uniform external pressure combined with some axial compression and static and dynamic lateral g-loading (which causes beam-type bending of the wavy-walled cylindrical shell). BEHAVIORS: 1. Maximum axisymmetric stress in shell wall from nonlinear theory, STRMAX. 2. Buckling load factor from nonlinear theory, BUCFAC. 3. High-circumferential wave buckling from nonlinear theory, BUCHIW. 4. Maximum stress at circumferential coordinate, theta=0 degree from linear theory, STR0. 5. Maximum stress at theta = 180 degree from linear theory, STR180. 6. Linear buckling load factor at theta = 0 degrees, BUC0.
115
BEHAVIORS (continued) 7. Linear buckling at theta = 0 deg., buckling mode is anti- symmetric at the midlength symmetry plane, B0ANTI. 8. Linear buckling at theta = 0 deg., mid-circumferential-wave range, BUC0MD. 9. Linear buckling at theta = 0 deg., high-circumferential-wave range, BUC0HI. 10. Linear buckling at 180 deg., BUC180 11. Linear buckling at theta = 180 deg., high-circumferential-wave range, B180HI. 12. Linear maximum normal displacement at theta = 0 deg., WWW0
116
BEHAVIORS (concluded) 13. Linear maximum normal displacement at theta = 180 deg., WWW180 14. Modal frequency corresponding to beam-bending mode between lateral supports, FREQ. 15. Maximum stress from random lateral and axial excitation, STRRAN. 16. Buckling load factor from random lateral and axial excitation, BUCRAN. 17. High-circumferential-wave buckling load factor from random lateral and axial excitation, BRANHI. 18. Maximum normal displacement from random lateral and axial excitation, WWWRAN.
117
DECISION VARIABLES, BRINGS, WAVLEN, AMPLIT, THICK, HWEB, TWEB, HFLANG, TFLANG
118
GLOSSARY OF VARIABLES USED IN “WAVYCYL”
119
GLOSSARY OF VARIABLES IN “WAVYCYL” (continued)…
120
GLOSSARY OF VARIABLES IN “WAVYCYL” (concluded)
121
VALUES OF BEHAVIOR AND MARGINS OF OPTIMIZED SHELL
122
FILES THAT CAN BE USED AS DIRECT INPUT INTO BIGBOSOR4 AND WHAT QUANTITIES ARE COMPUTED CORRESPONDING TO EACH FILE
123
THE PART OF SUB.BEHX1 WRITTEN BY THE GENOPT USER
124
BUCKLING AND VIBRATION MODES FOR OPTIMIZED WAVY- WALLED CYLINDRICAL SHELL WITH “SMEARED” WAVYNESS AND ACTUAL WAVYNESS
125
VIBRATION MODE WITH INCREASING MAX.PERMITTED DEGREES OF FREEDOM. “MAXDOF”, IN THE BIGBOSOR4 MODEL OF THE OPTIMIZED WAVY-WALLED CYLINDER
126
Externally pressurized imperfect ellipsoidal shell STAGS model of amplitude of axisymmetric buckling modal imperfection
127
EXTERNALLY PRESSURIZED, AXISYMMETRICALLY IMPERFECT ISOGRID-STIFFENED ELLIPSOIDAL SHELLS The shell is modeled as an “equivalent” ellipsoidal shell by matching the ellipsoidal profile as closely as possible by a number of shell segments each of which is toroidal. That is, each of which has a constant meridional curvature. This is done to avoid finite element “lockup” in BIGBOSOR4, which leads to seriously unconservative predictions.
128
EQUIVALENT ELLIPSOIDAL SHELL UNDER EXTERNAL PRESSURE
129
DISCRETIZED MODEL, SHOWING 12 SEGMENT EQUIVALENT ELLIPSOIDAL SHELL. EACH OF THE 12 SEGMENTS IS TOROIDAL (constant meridional curvature). THE OVERALL PROFILE MATCHES AN ELLIPSOID. BIGBOSOR4 model
130
x (radial) coordinates at the ends of each of the 12 segments.
131
DECISION VARIABLES The thickness of the shell wall and the height of the isogrid stiffeners varies along the meridian. The spacing of the isogrid members and their thickness is uniform along the meridian. The shell is elastic. The decision variables are: 1. The height of the isogrid members at 13 “call-out” points along the shell meridian. 2. The thickness of the shell wall at the same 13 “call-out” points along the shell meridian. 3. The spacing of the isogrid members (constant). 4. The thickness of the isogrid members (constant).
132
REASON TO TRY TO SOLVE THIS OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM The behavior of externally pressurized, axisymmetrically imperfect ellipsoidal shells that are “flatter” than a spherical shell is quite nonlinear, even if the material remains elastic. The nonlinear behavior presents a challenge when automated optimization is attempted because early nonlinear axisymmetric collapse may occur as the behavior of various non-optimum designs are processed during optimization cycles. Reliable strategies must be introduced to prevent numerical “crashing” during optimization cycles.
133
TYPES OF ANALYSIS 1. Linear axisymmetric bifurcation buckling (to obtain imperfection shapes). 2. Nonlinear axisymmetric stress analysis of axisymmetrically imperfect shell (to obtain the maximum stress in skin and stiffeners in two meridional regions and to obtain local buckling of the skin and stiffeners in two meridional regions. 3. Nonlinear axisymmetric collapse analysis of axisymetrically imperfect shell (to find the maximum load-bearing capacity of the imperfect shell neglecting non-axisymmetric bifurcation buckling) 4. Nonlinear bifurcation buckling of the axisymmetrically imperfect shell (to find the maximum load-bearing capacity of the axisymmetrically imperfect shell in the presence of nonlinear non- axisymmetric bifurcation buckling.
134
WORK THAT IS DONE 1. The GENOPT user establishes variable names and definitions. 2. The GENOPT user decides which “behaviors” are to be considered (linear buckling, nonlinear stress and local buckling, general collapse, and nonlinear general buckling). 3. The GENOPT user writes FORTRAN routines that call the BIGBOSOR4 processors to obtain the “behaviors”. (In this case only SUBROUTINE STRUCT is “fleshed out”; BEHAVIOR.NEW is produced entirely by GENOPT.) 4. The GENOPT user compiles and checks and re-checks the software he/she has introduced. 5. The END user sets up cases for stiffened and unstiffened “equivalent” ellipsoidal shells and optimizes them. 6. The END user compares predictions from STAGS and BIGBOSOR4 for the optimized shells.
135
GLOSSARY OF VARIABLES IN THE “EQUIVELLIPSE” GENERIC CASE
137
“MODE 1” AXISYMMETRIC IMPERFECTION SHAPE BIGBOSOR4 model
138
“MODE 2” AXISYMMETRIC IMPERFECTION SHAPE BIGBOSOR4 model
139
VARIOUS BEHAVIORS CORRESPONDING TO LOAD SET 1: + MODE 1 AND + MODE 2 IMPERFECTION SHAPES
140
MARGINS CORRESPONDING TO THE BEHAVIORS LISTED ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE
141
NOMENCLATURE IN SOME OF THE DESIGN MARGINS
142
MORE NOMENCLATURE IN SOME OF THE MARGINS
143
VARIOUS BEHAVIORS CORRESPONDING TO LOAD SET 2: -MODE 1 AND -MODE 2 IMPERFECTION SHAPES
144
MARGINS CORRESPONDING TO THE BEHAVIORS LISTED ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE
145
ANALYSIS NO. 1: LINEAR AXISYMMETRIC BUCKLING, USED IN ORDER TO GET BUCKLING MODAL IMPERFECTION SHAPES: MODE 1 and MODE 2
146
ANALYSIS NO. 2, NONLINEAR AXISYMMETRIC STRESS ANALYSIS WITH +MODE 1 IMPERFECTION SHAPE AT THE DESIGN PRESSURE: p = 460 psi
147
ANALYSIS NO. 2, NONLINEAR AXISYMMETRIC STRESS ANALYSIS WITH +MODE 1 IMPERFECTION SHAPE (concluded)
148
ANALYSIS NO. 3, NONLINEAR AXISYMMETRIC STRESS ANALYSIS WITH +MODE 2 IMPERFECTION SHAPE AT THE DESIGN PRESSURE: p = 460 psi
149
ANALYSIS NO. 4, NONLINEAR AXISYMMETRIC COLLAPSE ANALYSIS WITH +MODE 1 IMPERFECTION SHAPE
150
ANALYSIS NO. 5, NONLINEAR AXISYMMETRIC COLLAPSE ANALYSIS WITH +MODE 2 IMPERFECTION SHAPE
151
ANALYSIS NO. 6, NONLINEAR NON-AXISYMMETRIC BIFURCATION BUCKLING ANALYSIS WITH THE +MODE 1 IMPERFECTION SHAPE
152
ANALYSIS NO. 7, NONLINEAR NON-AXISYMMETRIC BIFURCATION BUCKLING ANALYSIS WITH THE +MODE 2 IMPERFECTION SHAPE Next, do it all again with the minus Mode 1 and minus Mode 2 imperfections.
153
DESIGN ITERATIONS DURING A “SUPEROPT” RUN
154
OPTIMUM DESIGN OF STIFFENED EQUIVALENT ELLIPSOIDAL SHELL WITH MERIDIONALLY VARYING SKIN THICKNESS AND HEIGHT OF ISOGRID
155
LOAD-DEFLECTION CURVES FROM BOSOR4 AND STAGS
156
OBJECTIVE (WEIGHT) DURING THE 1ST “SUPEROPT” RUN FOR AN UNSTIFFENED EQUIVALENT ELLIPSOIDAL SHELL
157
OBJECTIVE (WEIGHT) DURING THE 2ND “SUPEROPT” RUN
158
OBJECTIVE (WEIGHT) DURING THE 3RD “SUPEROPT” RUN
159
OBJECTIVE (WEIGHT) DURING THE 4TH “SUPEROPT” RUN
160
OBJECTIVE (WEIGHT) DURING THE 5TH “SUPEROPT” RUN
161
OPTIMUM DESIGN OF UNSTIFFENED EQUIVALENT ELLIPSOIDAL SHELL WITH MERIDIONALLY VARYING SKIN THICKNESS
162
LINEAR BUCKLING AXISYMMETRIC MODE 1 FROM BIGBOSOR4 FOR THE OPTIMIZED UNSTIFFENED EQUIV. ELLIPSOIDAL SHELL BIGBOSOR4 model
163
LINEAR AXISYMMETRIC BUCKLING MODE 1 FOR THE OPTIMIZED SHELL FROM STAGS STAGS gets pcr=651 psi BIGBOSOR4 gets 642 psi
164
LINEAR AXISYMMETRIC MODE 2 BUCKLING FROM BIGBOSOR4 BIGBOSOR4 model
165
LINEAR AXISYMMETRIC BUCKLING MODE 2 FROM STAGS STAGS gets pcr = 684 psi, BIGBOSOR4 gets 667 psi.
166
PREBUCKLING AXISYMMETRIC DEFORMATION IN THE PRESENCE OF A -MODE 1 INITIAL IMPERFECTION SHAPE BIGBOSOR4 model
167
NONLINEAR NON-AXISYMMETRIC BUCKLING, -MODE 1 INITIAL IMPERFECTION SHAPE BIGBOSOR4 model
168
NONLINEAR NON-AXISYMMETRIC BUCKLING MODE FROM STAGS FOR THE SHELL WITH THE -MODE 1 IMPERFECTION SHAPE STAGS gets pcr=407 psi, BIGBOSOR4 gets 478 psi
169
COMPARISON OF STAGS AND BIGBOSOR4 PREDICTIONS FOR OPTIMIZED UNSTIFFENED SHELL WITH -MODE 1 Wimp
170
A VERY EARLY USE OF GENOPT. MY SON, BILL, HELPED A FRIEND OF HIS WITH SOME PHD RESEARCH THE FRIEND WAS DOING AT U. C. BERKELEY
171
ANOTHER APPLICATION OF GENOPT FOR PHD RESEARCH IN THE APPLIED MECHANICS DEPARTMENT AT STANFORD
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.