1. Licensing non-native biological control agents: the English way Biological Control in Ireland & Northern Ireland Sarah Hugo 12 th May 2011

2. Outline Legislative background Role of Fera Process and key players Assessment of applications Case studies Issues

3. Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (WCA) Section 14 of the WCA 1981 prohibits the release into the wild or allowing to escape to the wild of all animal species which are not native to Great Britain, whatever their proposed use Includes holding non-native animals in semi-confined situations such as gardens, glasshouses, aquatic cages Non-native is “of a kind not ordinarily resident in and is not a regular visitor to Great Britain in a wild state”

4. WCA: Section 16 Section 16 gives the Secretary of State powers to grant licences for releases so that Section 14 does not apply Releases of non-native animals may therefore be licensed under the Act for specific purposes such as: research, education, species (re-) establishment, control of pests on commercial crops, control of invasive organisms

5. WCA: section 16 licenses In England, the licensing authority for the release of a non-native animal or listed plant species is the Secretary of State for Defra: Fera is the appointed licensing body for non-native biological control agents Natural England is the licensing body for all other purposes Licence holders have a legal responsibility to comply with the statutory conditions in licences Inspection and enforcement mechanism via Defra’s ‘Wildlife Inspectorate’ and the police

7. Application for a licence Two types of licence: Releaser’s licence, for experimental or species (re-)establishment purposes Supplier’s and grower’s licences for commercial release (sale and distribution) Applications must include information on the organism to be released, purpose of release, and sufficient biological data to enable assessment of the risks and benefits Standard application form provided

8. Assessment of applications Fera receives and assesses all applications WCA guidance states “Secretary of State may wish to take advice before granting a licence”: Advice may be obtained from persons who are members of the Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment Advice may be sought on nature conservation and wildlife aspects from Natural England, JNCC, SNH and CCW, and from Defra, SG and WAG

9. Assessment of new applications Can the organism overwinter & establish in GB? YesNo Applicant’s experimental evidence ‘Climex’ data Is the organism host-specific? Potential risks and benefits of the specific release Special conditions attached to licence? Licence plus monitoring requirements Potential for dispersal? Applicant’s experimental evidence OK to licence? Yes Reject No Yes Limited Applicant’s experimental evidence Direct &/or indirect non-target effects? Applicant’s experimental evidence &/ or published data Wider consultation needed?

10. Consultation process Straightforward applications and renewals

11. Slide removed as it contained commercial information about licences issued

12. Release of Aphalara itadori Classical biological control of Japanese knotweed Complicated by requirement to lift plant health licence restrictions Lengthy process requiring Ministerial approval Licence issued with phased release and strict monitoring requirements

13. Straightforward applications and renewals Peer review Pre-requisite for issuing licence under WCA = REMOVAL of plant health ‘quarantine’ status

14. Interesting conundrums Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus - Predatory mite particularly effective against red spider mite - Licensed for many years in glasshouses only - Reported in strawberry fields across country - Growers want it de-regulated “Supernemos” - Company selling already-licensed EPNs, but in different formulations - Enhanced virulence against target pests: need to licence?

15. Issues to address Must balance regulatory burden on applicant with scope and potential impact of release – including requirements for post release monitoring Separate licenses needed for release in England, Scotland and Wales Aware that process is not as visible as it could be – improve website and links from Defra, NNSS etc Classical biological control – need to clarify route for fungal agents Very different practices across the EU Member States – EPPO trying to ‘harmonise’ to some degree

16. Thank you for listening sarah.hugo@fera.gsi.gov.uk + 44 (0) 1904 462223