Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hickey and Mohan Relocating Participation within a Radical Politics of Development Seminario Línea II Ma Antropología Alexandra Urán C.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hickey and Mohan Relocating Participation within a Radical Politics of Development Seminario Línea II Ma Antropología Alexandra Urán C."— Presentation transcript:

1 Hickey and Mohan Relocating Participation within a Radical Politics of Development Seminario Línea II Ma Antropología Alexandra Urán C.

2 History of Participation in Development Distinction between immanent processes and imminent interventions Imminent: the ‘willed’ development policies underpinning interventions Immanent: the underlying processes of development that explain the rationale of given interventions

3 Tansformative Participation  Participatory Governance and Decentralization  NGO’s and participatory development  Social movements

4 Participatory Governance  People’s Planning Campaign  Participatory Budgeting Theory of Empowered Deliberative Democracy (a strong civil society should be supported by a strong state)

5 NGO’s and participatory development Critique of participation promoted by NGO’s: 1. Confused status of NGO’s (civic, private or public?) 2. Who do NGO’s represent? 3. Power relations among Northern and Southern NGO’s Result: often patron-client relations are established between beneficiaries and

6 Beyond the fallacy of the ‘local’.  Participatory forms of NGO advocacy involving downward accountability  Adult Education, Citizenship and Radical Politics (REFLECT): Reconnecting technocratic participatory methodologies (PRA) with radical approaches (Freirian pedagogy of liberation

7 Social Movements The postmodern theory of social movements (see Escobar’s article on imagining a postdevelopment era) is premised on a critique of modernity (cultural politics, against development, against the state). However, most social movements are critical within a critical modernist position rather than advocating postmodernist post- development positions (issues of land, democracy, citizenship and development; examples MST and Zapatistas)

8 Transformative participation Conditions: 1. Being part of a broader socio-political project 2. An engagement with the underlying (immanent) processes of development 3. Focus on citizenship as against the establishment of patron-client relations 4. Existence of a ‘ progressive’ political elite

9 Broadening the participation agenda  Civic republicanism (citizens as active members of a political community) as against liberal notions of citizenship (formal ‘voting’ rights); citizenship within this conceptualization constitutes not only a set of legal obligations and entitlements but also the practice by which claims are made and rights are expanded

10 Broadening the participation agenda 2 1. Deconstructing the public/private divide: broadening the notion of the ‘public’ and identifying the participatory arenas in which subaltern groups wage their struggles 2. The importance of identities for minority/oppressed groups (recognition politics and an ‘emancipatory poltics of difference’) This means going beyond the universalist and anti-universalist debate

11 Critical Modernism  Retaining a belief in the central tenets of modernism: democracy, emancipation, development and progress  Modernity as heterogenous and multiple  Political agency vested not in the state or a political party but in the capacity of civic associations, social movements and political parties to form coalitions around certain forms of exclusion and subordination


Download ppt "Hickey and Mohan Relocating Participation within a Radical Politics of Development Seminario Línea II Ma Antropología Alexandra Urán C."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google