Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVictoria Ellis Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 Network Security introduction cryptography authentication key exchange Reading: Tannenbaum, section 7.1 Ross/Kurose, Ch 7 (which is incomplete) Ross/Kurose, Ch 7 (which is incomplete)
2
2 Network Security Intruder may eavesdrop remove, modify, and/or insert messages read and playback messages
3
3 Important issues: cryptography: secrecy of info being transmitted authentication: proving who you are and having correspondent prove his/her/its identity
4
4 Security in Computer Networks User resources: login passwords often transmitted unencrypted in TCP packets between applications (e.g., telnet, ftp) passwords provide little protection
5
5 Network resources: often completely unprotected from intruder eavesdropping, injection of false messages mail spoofs, router updates, ICMP messages, network management messages Bottom line: intruder attaching his/her machine (access to OS code, root privileges) onto network can override many system-provided security measures users must take a more active role
6
6 Encryption plaintext: unencrypted message ciphertext: encrypted form of message Intruder may intercept ciphertext transmission intercept plaintext/ciphertext pairs obtain encryption decryption algorithms
7
7 A simple encryption algorithm Substitution cipher: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzpoiuytrewqasdfghjklmnbvczx replace each plaintext character in message with matching ciphertext character: plaintext: Charlotte, my love ciphertext: iepksgmmy, dz sgby
8
8 key is pairing between plaintext characters and ciphertext characters symmetric key: sender and receiver use same key 26! (approx 10^26) different possible keys: unlikely to be broken by random trials substitution cipher subject to decryption using observed frequency of letters 'e' most common letter, 'the' most common word
9
9 DES: Data Encryption Standard encrypts data in 64-bit chunks encryption/decryption algorithm is a published standard everyone knows how to do it substitution cipher over 64-bit chunks: 56-bit key determines which of 56! substitution ciphers used substitution: 19 stages of transformations, 16 involving functions of key
10
10 decryption done by reversing encryption steps sender and receiver must use same key
11
11 Key Distribution Problem Problem: how do communicant agree on symmetric key? N communicants implies N keys Trusted agent distribution: keys distributed by centralized trusted agent any communicant need only know key to communicate with trusted agent for communication between i and j, trusted agent will provide a key
12
12 We will cover in more detail shortly
13
13 Public Key Cryptography separate encryption/decryption keys receiver makes known (!) its encryption key receiver keeps its decryption key secret to send to receiver B, encrypt message M using B's publicly available key, EB send EB(M) to decrypt, B applies its private decrypt key DB to receiver message: computing DB( EB(M) ) gives M
14
14 knowing encryption key does not help with decryption; decryption is a non-trivial inverse of encryption only receiver can decrypt message Question: good encryption/decryption algorithms
15
15 RSA: public key encryption/decryption RSA: a public key algorithm for encrypting/decrypting Entity wanting to receive encrypted messages: choose two prime numbers, p, q greater than 10^100 compute n=pq and z = (p-1)(q-1) choose number d which has no common factors with z compute e such that ed = 1 mod z, i.e., integer-remainder( (ed) / ((p-1)(q-1)) ) = 1, i.e., integer-remainder( (ed) / ((p-1)(q-1)) ) = 1, i.e., ed = k(p-1)(q-1) +1 ed = k(p-1)(q-1) +1 three numbers: e, n made public d kept secret
16
16 RSA (continued) to encrypt: divide message into blocks, {b_i} of size j: 2^j < n encrypt: encrypt(b_i) = b_I^e mod n to decrypt: b_i = encrypt(b_i)^d to break RSA: need to know p, q, given pq=n, n known factoring 200 digit n into primes takes 4 billion years using known methods
17
17 RSA example choose p=3, q=11, gives n=33, (p-1)(q-1)=z=20 choose d = 7 since 7 and 20 have no common factors compute e = 3, so that ed = k(p-1)(q-1)+1 (note: k=1 here)
18
18
19
19 Further notes on RSA why does RSA work? crucial number theory result: if p, q prime then b_i^((p-1)(q-1)) mod pq = 1 b_i^((p-1)(q-1)) mod pq = 1 using mod pq arithmetic: (b^e)^d = b^{ed} = b^{k(p-1)(q-1)+1} for some k = b^{k(p-1)(q-1)+1} for some k = b b^(p-1)(q-1) b^(p-1)(q-1)... b^(p-1)(q-1) = b b^(p-1)(q-1) b^(p-1)(q-1)... b^(p-1)(q-1) = b 1 1... 1 = b 1 1... 1 = b = b Note: we can also encrypt with d and encrypt with e. this will be useful shortly
20
20 How to break RSA? Brute force: get B's public key for each possible b_i in plaintext, compute b_i^e for each observed b_i^e, we then know b_i moral: choose size of b_i "big enough"
21
21 man-in-the-middle: intercept keys, spoof identity:
22
22 Authentication Question: how does a receiver know that remote communicating entity is who it is claimed to be?
23
23 Authentication Protocol (ap) Ap 1.0 Alice to Bob: “I am Alice” Problem: intruder “Trudy” can also send such a message Ap 2.0 Authenticate source IP address is from Alice’s machine Problem: IP Spoofing (send IP packets with a false address) Ap 3.0: use a secret password Alice to Bob: “I am Alice, here is my password” (e.g., telnet) Problem: Trudy can intercept Alice’s password by sniffing packets
24
24 Authentication Protocol Ap 3.1: use encryption use a symmetric key known to Alice and Bob Alice & Bob (only) know secure key for encryption/decryption A to B: msg = encrypt("I am A") B computes: if decrypt(msg)=="I am A" then A is verified then A is verified else A is fradulent else A is fradulent failure scenarios: playback attack Trudy can intercept Alice’s message and masquerade as Alice at a later time
25
25 Authentication Using Nonces Problem with ap 3.1: same password is used for all sessions Solution: use a sequence of passwords pick a "once-in-a-lifetime-only" number (nonce) for each session Ap 4.0 A to B: msg = "I am A" /* note: unencrypted message! */ B to A: once-in-a-lifetime value, n A to B: msg2 = encrypt(n) /* use symmetric keys */ B computes: if decrypt(msg2)==n then A is verified then A is verified else A is fradulent else A is fradulent note similarities to three way handshake and initial sequence number choice problems with nonces?
26
26 Authentication Using Public Keys Ap 4.0 uses symmetric keys for authentication Ap 4.0 uses symmetric keys for authentication Question: can we use public keys? symmetry: DA( EA(n) ) = EA ( DA(n) ) AP 5.0 A to B: msg = "I am A" B to A: once-in-a-lifetime value, n A to B: msg2 = DA(n) B computes: if EA (DA(n))== n then A is verified then A is verified else A is fradulent else A is fradulent
27
27 Problems with Ap 5.0 Bob needs Alice’s public key for authentication Trudy can impersonate as Alice to Bob –Trudy to Bob: msg = “I am Alice” –Bob to Alice: nonce n (Trudy intercepts this message) –Trudy to Bob: msg2= DT(n) –Bob to Alice: send me your public key (Trudy intercepts) –Trudy to Bob: send ET (claiming it is EA) –Bob: verify ET(DT(n)) == n and authenticates Trudy as Alice!! Moral: Ap 5.0 is only as “secure” as public key distribution
28
28 Man-in-the-middle Attack Trudy impersonates as Alice to Bob and as Bob to Alice Alice Trudy Bob “I am A” “I am A” nonce n DT(n) send me ET ET nonce n DA(n) send me EA EA Bob sends data using ET, Trudy decrypts and forwards it using EA!! (Trudy transparently intercepts every message)
29
29 Digital Signatures Using Public Keys Goals of digital signatures: sender cannot repudiate message never sent ("I never sent that") receiver cannot fake a received message Suppose A wants B to "sign" a message M B sends DB(M) to A A computes if EB ( DB(M)) == M then B has signed M then B has signed M Question: can B plausibly deny having sent M?
30
30 Message Digests Encrypting and decrypting entire messages using digital signatures is computationally expensive Routers routinely exchange data –Does not need encryption –Needs authentication and verify that data hasn’t changed Message digests: like a checksum Hash function H: converts variable length string to fixed length hash Digitally sign H(M) Send M, EA(H(m)) Can verify who sent the message and that it has been changed! Property of H Given a digest x, it is infeasible to find a message y such that H(y) = x It is infeasible to find any two messages x and y such that H(x) = H(y)
31
31 Symmetric key exchange: trusted server Problem: how do distributed entities agree on a key? Assume: each entity has its own single key, which only it and trusted server know Server: will generate a one-time session key that A and B use to encrypt communication will use A and B's single keys to communicate session key to A, B
32
32
33
33 Symmetric Key exchange: trusted server Preceding scenario: 1. A sends encrypted msg to S, containing A, B, nonce RA: EA(A,B,RA) 2. S decrypts using DA, generates one time session key, K, sends nonce, key, and B-encrypted encoding of key to A: EA(RA,B,K,EB(K,A)) 3. A decrypts msg from S using DA and verifies nonce. Extracts K, saves it and sends EB(K,A) to B. 4. B decrypts msg using DB, extracts K, generates new nonce RB, sends EK(RB) to A 5. A decrypts using K, extracts RB, computes RB-1 and encrypts using K. Sends EK(RB-1) to B 6. B decrypts using K and verifies RB-1
34
34 Public key exchange: trusted server public key retrieval subject to man-in-middle attack locate all public keys in trusted server everyone has server's encryption key (ED public) suppose A wants to send to B using B's "public" key
35
35 Protection against Intruders: Firewalls
36
36 Firewall: network components (host/router+software) sitting between inside ("us") and outside ("them) Packet filtering firewalls: drop packets on basis of source or destination address (i.e., IP address, port) Application gateways: application specific code intercepts, processes and/or relays application specific packets e.g., email of telnet gateways application gateway code can be security hardened can log all activity
37
37 Secure Email Requirements: Secrecy Sender authentication Message integrity Receiver authentication Secrecy Can use public keys to encrypt messages –Inefficient for long messages Use symmetric keys –Alice generates a symmetric key K –Encrypt message M with K –Encrypt K with E B –Send K(M), E B (K) –Bob decrypts using his private key, gets K, decrypts K(M)
38
38 Secure Email Authentication and Integrity (with no secrecy) Alice applies hash function H to M (H can be MD5) Creates a digital signature D A (H(M)) Send M, D A (H(M)) to Bob Putting it all together Compute H(M), D A (H(M)) M’= { H(M), D A (H(M)) } Generate symmetric key K, compute K(M’) Encrypt K as E B (K) Send K(M’), E B (K) Used in PGP (pretty good privacy)
39
39 Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) SSL: Developed by Netscape Provides data encryption and authentication between web server and client SSL lies above the transport layer Useful for Internet Commerce, secure mail access (IMAP) Features: –SSL server authentication –Encrypted SSL session –SSL client authentication
40
40 Secure Socket Layer Protocol: https instead of http Browser -> Server: B’s SSL version and preferences S->B: S’s SSL version, preferences, and certificate –Certificate: server’s RSA public key encrypted by CA’s private key B: uses its list of CAs and public keys to decrypt S’s public key B->S: generate K, encrypt K with with E S B->S: “future messages will be encrypted”, and K(m) S->B: “future messages will be encrypted”, and K(m) SSL session begins…
41
41 SSL SET: secure electronic transactions [Visa, Mastercard] Designed for secure credit card payment Includes client, merchant and merchant’s bank Homework: read up on SET from KR 7.7.2 Homework: get your own digital certificate Click on “security” icon (next to “print” icon) in Netscape 4.7 Click on “Certificates” and then on “obtain your certificate” Send an email to yourself signed with your certificate Also examine listed of trusted CAs built into the browser
42
42 Security: Internet activity IP layer: authentication of header: receiver can authenticate sender using messageauthentication code (MAC) encryption of contents: DES, RFC 1829 API SSL - secure socket layer: support for authentication and encryption port numbers: 443 for http with SSL, 465 for smtp with SSL Application Layer Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM) secure http: supports many authentication, encryption schemes
43
43 Secure Email PEM : operates on top of SMTP ASCII msg authentication - MD2, MD5 msg encryption - RSA, DES authenticated encrypted msgs and encrypted authenticated msgs PGP (Pretty Good Privacy): secure file transfer (incl. email) binary files
44
44 Security: conclusion key concerns: encryption authentication key exchange also: increasingly an important area as network connectivity increases digital signatures, digital cash, authentication, increasingly important an important social concern further reading: Crypto Policy Perspectives: S. Landau et al., Aug 1994 CACM Internet Security, R. Oppliger, CACM May 1997 www.eff.org
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.