1. CONNECTING DOTS AND SEEING THE WHOLE: OUTCOME MAPS AS A NEXUS FOR DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2012 Yuerong Sweetland, PhD – Director of Assessment, Franklin University

2. Presentation Overview  Why  What  Process and Template  Challenges  Sustainability  Ownership  Questions & Answers

3. Background (2) www.guy-sports.com

4. Definition: Outcome Mapping “…a two-dimensional data recording tool that facilitates the assignment of…outcomes… to core program courses… while identifying the level at which the outcomes are addressed in each course (at the intersection of columns and rows).” Veltri, Natasha F.; Webb, Harold W.; Matveev, Alexei G.; Zapatero, Enrique G. (2011, March 22). Curriculum mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS curriculum The Free Library. (2011). Retrieved May 22, 2012 from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Curriculum mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS...- a0257434962http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Curriculum mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS...- a0257434962

5. Why Mapping?  Curriculum evaluation and improvement  Who is doing what  Alignment with goals  Effectiveness and efficiency  Facilitating teaching and learning

6. Who Benefits? Scope, sequence, balance Coherence Gap Program Interpret assessment findings Accreditation documentation Assessment & Accreditation Faculty Students Staff (SLC, Advisors) Communication between and among Stakeholders

7. Status: National  “Far too many institutions have established learning outcomes …. without ensuring that these goals are continuously mapped to, and reinforced by, the teaching and learning process throughout the curriculum ….” Peter Ewell (2009), Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement: Revisiting the Tension.

8. Status: Franklin University  Franklin University  Centralized academic model  Challenges

9. Franklin University Outcome Map Template Outcome 1Outcome 2Outcome 3Outcome 4 Course 1 Course 2 Other experiences (1) (e.g., exams, internships) Other experiences (2) Key: "I" = Introduced; "R" = Reinforced; "A" = Assessment Evidence Collected

10. Levels of Connection First time an outcome is introduced (e.g. Remembering, understanding) Introduced Applying Analyzing Evaluating Creating Reinforced

11. Mapping Process Draft Maps Gather & Analyze Evidence Discussion Make Improvement

12. Challenges: Sustainability  Periodical update  Outcomes  Courses  Connections  Established during the design stage  LMS?  CMS?  AMS?

13. Challenges: Ownership  Faculty ownership  Who collects and helps maintain maps  Assessment Office  Institutional Research Office  Institutional Effectiveness Office  Accreditation Office

14. Questions or Comments? Dr. Yuerong Sweetland Yuerong.sweetland@franklin.edu Connecting dots and seeing the whole: Outcome maps as a nexus for data- based decision making