1. IR1IMEM YEAR ONE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY L2: Reviewing Literature, Formulating Research Problem, Variables DR. JAVED-VASSILIS KHAN, Drs. Allerd Peters, Frank Weissman BREDA SEP2011

2. INDEX Reviewing the Literature

3. REVIEWING THE LITERATURE Integral part of research process In initial stages it helps to: Establish theoretical roots Clarify ideas Develop research methodology Later serves to: Consolidate your knowledge Integrate your findings with existing knowledge

4. LITERATURE REVIEW Most (graduation) proposals suffer from superficial understanding of the issue at stake If understanding about a subject does not go beyond ‘common knowledge’ => research ideas will be superficial and not state-of-the- art

5. LITERATURE REVIEW HELPS: Clarify your research problem/question Paradox, chicken-egg problem Iterative process Improve research methodology Methodologies used by others, pros/cons Broaden knowledge base What are findings around your RQ? What theories have been put forward? What are gaps in existing literature? Contextualize findings How do your findings fit into the existing body of knowledge?

6. LITERATURE REVIEW Before writing a research proposal you are able to give at least an informed answer to: What is already known with respect to my subject? What theories and concepts are relevant? What research strategies and methods have been employed by others performing similar research? What questions have remained unanswered/ what suggestions for further research have been done? What researchers are important with respect to this topic?

7. LITERATURE REVIEW: HOW TO Search existing literature in your area of interest Review this existing literature Develop a theoretical framework for your RQ Develop conceptual framework

8. SEARCH

9. ASSESSING LITERATURE QUALITY How can I see if it is a good source? Plenty of material => even more difficult to assess Not that easy

12. INDICATORS FOR A GOOD SOURCE 1.Carries a title 2.Has the author/s clearly listed 3.Uses sources according to an international standard reference list & in-text referencing according to e.g., APA 4.Is published at credible publishing houses 5.Is referenced by other researchers too If 1-3 are not met, the source is of questionable quality => refrain from using it If 4-5 are met, the source is of good quality => use it!

13. INDICATORS FOR A GOOD SOURCE 1.Carries a title 2.Has the author/s clearly listed 3.Uses sources according to an international standard reference list & in-text referencing according to e.g., APA 4.Is published at credible publishing houses 5.Is referenced by other researchers too 6.Has a summary or abstract 7.Is incorporated in electronic library collections 8.Is balanced in its word use and uses factual argumentation in stead of rhetoric

14. WEB SOURCES Easy to find -> hard to assess for quality Search engine can find a site but does not evaluate it Web sources can be published by anybody => no peer review, no editorial board Many web sources have their own agenda Need to cross-check Download all material found on the Internet

15. SOURCES http://scholar.google.com http://portal.acm.org http://ieeexplore.ieee.org http://sciencedirect.com Conference paper => less time to prepare, less time to review, more recent, limited scope Journal paper => more preparation, strict review process, established knowledge, easier to generalize Book chapter => even more established knowledge but no peer review

16. CREDIBLE PUBLISHING HOUSES ACM IEEE Elsevier Springer Taylor & Francis SAGE McGraw Hill Oxford University Press …

17. SEARCHING vs. FINDING Search easy but Find not easy Main problems: Sticking to the obvious Using tutor cited literature Inefficient search strategies Content is not possible to be accessed

18. EFFICIENT LITERATURE REVIEW STRATEGIES Search – find - evaluate RQ, general knowledge, literature => derive keywords Use specialized, credible sources Select sources in comparable context After having compiled a list of articles => evaluate & prioritize

19. ARTICLE EVALUATION Evaluate quality based on the afore mentioned indicators => how many indicators does it satisfy? Read abstract => is it interesting for my RQ? If yes => read conclusions => still interesting? Answer the question: ‘This source I can use for my research, because it gives the following information:...’ Only now you read the whole article