1. Coaching Mentoring and Reflecting Effectively: Creating a Culture of Excellence Through Colleague Collaboration and Reflective Practice Helene Chan, Norman Masuda and Duarte Silva Stanford University School of Education/ Palo Alto Unified School District STARTALK Projects STARTALK Network for Program Excellence Meeting October 16-18, 2009 Chicago, Illinois

2. INTRODUCTIONS Helene Chan, Chinese/French Teacher, Teacher Education Coordinator, Member of CFLP Leadership Team, STARTALK Instructor Norman Masuda, Chinese Japanese, Teacher, Instructional Supervisor, Consultant--CFLP, PAUSD, WASC, STARTALK Instructor Duarte Silva, Executive Director, CFLP, STARTALK Director

3. GOALS AND FOCUS of SESSION Share Stanford/PAUSD STARTALK model related to Coaching, Mentoring and Reflective Practices Demonstrate different aspects of our model Engage participants in discussion and activity for how to adopt the model and apply the model in your local contexts Respond to participants’ questions about the model

4. Connecting, Assessing Participants’ Prior Knowledge and Experience and Framing Main Concepts for the Session Activity I—Tea Party Form two lines so each of you faces a partner One of the lines will be designated the “moving line” Meet/greet your partner, read and reflect on question that is posted on the screen Share your reflective thoughts with your partner Stop when asked by the Facilitator The moving line moves one person to the right. Now each of you has a new partner Repeat the process with each new question

5. TEA PARTY QUESTION I When you think of the word “coach” what comes to mind?

6. TEA PARTY QUESTION II Have you ever coached or been coached in a professional setting? If so, what were the outcomes? If not, what do you envision the outcomes to be?

7. TEA PARTY QUESTION III Think of a time in which you received meaningful feedback from a colleague. What role did it play in supporting you to become a more effective educator?

8. TEA PARTY QUESTION IV What role might coaching and reflective practices play in improving instruction for students?

9. TEA PARTY QUESTION V What do you believe might be the benefits of having your STARTALK teacher-participants engage in a peer/cognitive coaching process?

10. OVERVIEW OF STANFORD/PAUSD PROGRAM MODEL Context in which the Model was developed and applied Different Components of the Model Roles--Peers, Coach Preparation of Participants to successfully engage in the process Developing a culture of inquiry, trust and collaboration Effective ways of providing feedback

11. DEMONSTRATION OF THE MODEL: PRE-CONFERENCE Peers meet, and complete pre-observation protocol Coach--observes and clarifies questions

12. DEMONSTRATION: TEACHING OF LESSON AND PEER OBSERVATION A peer teaches a lesson the other peer observes and takes notes Coach--observes and takes notes on the process

13. DEMONSTRATION: TEACHING A LESSON Topic: Overview of Peer Coaching and Reflective Practices Objective: Share key components of the Peer Coaching process and how it can be applied to create a collaborative culture of inquiry and trust in a language department or school.

14. Participants typically apply:10% of what they learn in PD programs25% if the learning including demonstration/practice 90% if the program includes a Peer Coaching/ Colleague Collaboration Component (Showers and Joyce, 2002) RESEARCH ON PEER COACHING

15. Peer Coaching: Collegiality Webster Defines “Collegiality” as: “The relationship of colleagues marked by equal sharing of power and authority.”

16. Peer Coaching: Collegiality Builds trust by developing positive rapport among colleagues Facilitates thinking through questioning and developing greater precision in language to describe our practices (Reflection) Develops a professional learning community that focuses on continuous improvement and collaboration

17. Distinguishes between coaching and evaluation Promotes cognitive coaching interactions that are congruent with a variety of teaching styles and professional practices Encourages coaching skills which enhance the intellectual processes of performance and reflective practices. Peer Coaching: Collegiality

18. Teaching Colleague(s) Coach Pre-Conference Observation Post-Conference Peer Coaching: Roles and Process

19. Pre-conference: Purposes: Determine what is to be taught Clarify lesson’s objectives and the expected student performance Specify feedback sought by the Colleague/Coach Agree to collect desired data and provide feedback during the post-conference Peer Coaching: Collegiality

20. Observation Purposes: Observe and objectively capture classroom actions (teaching, student learning, management strategies/ student interaction, etc.) Focus only on areas that were agreed to be observed Capture/organize data in a manner that is useful to the colleague being observed Peer Coaching: Roles and Process

21. Post Observation: Role of the Teaching Colleague Shares feedback/data on the specific instructional/management activity that was targeted for the observation. Reflects along with his/her colleague on what was learned and how to apply “new learning” in the future lessons Interacts positively with colleague regarding observation and through a questioning process engages the colleague on identifying strategies that may improve future practices. Peer Coaching: Roles and Process

22. Post Observation: Role of the Coach: Observes and supports the integrity of the process Allows primary interaction to occur among the peers Promotes reflective practices by posing questions related to the feedback that is shared among the peers Offers impartial insight related to effective practices Interacts positively and offers support by acknowledging the progress being made in the targeted areas of performance. Peer Coaching: Roles and Process

23. Teaching Colleagues Pre-Conference Observation Post-Conference Based on collegial relationships Builds trust, leads to improved application of what is learned, develops positive interactions among colleagues, and most important--improves learning in the classroom. Peer Coaching: Summary

24. Peers meet and share findings from observation Coach clarifies questions and aims to move the conversation to reflective model Demonstration of the Model: Post Conference

25. Participants’ Questions Model Process Roles Impact Application

26. CLOSURE For more information on Peer Coaching please contact us: Helene Chan: VIPchan@aol.comVIPchan@aol.com Norman Masuda: norman@ntmasuda.comnorman@ntmasuda.com Duarte Silva:duarte.silva@stanford.eduduarte.silva@stanford.edu