1. IN2P3 Les deux infinis G. Balik, B. Caron, L. Brunetti (LAViSta Team) LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France Optimization of the final focus stabilization for CLIC The 21 st October 2010

2. Final focus stabilization Repetition rate of the beam: 50 Hz Position at the interaction point Indirect disturbances : Seismic motion Beam (e - ) ΔY≠0 (if no trajectory control) Final focus Detector Final focus Direct disturbances : Acoustic noise, cooling... Magnetic axis of the focalisation magnet Desired beam Beam (e + ) ACTIVE/PASSIVE ISOLATION FOCUSING MAGNET RIGID GIRDER KICKER position Specification: Displacement of the beam at the IP < 0.1nm integrated RMS @ 0Hz 2Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

3. Typical ground motion measured at CMS PSD [m²/Hz] Frequency [Hz] Beam trajectory control Active/passive isolation Beam trajectory control limited by the repetition rate of the beam Ground motion integrated RMS already between a few nm to dozens of nm at 5 Hz CERN (K.Artoos, M.Guinchard…) 3Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

4. Position at the IP: ∆Y Seismic motion Desired beam position: Y=0 + + Active/passive isolation Actuator (Kicker) Mechanical scheme and control point of view + + Direct disturbances 4Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

5. Position at the IP: ∆Y Seismic motion Desired beam position: Y=0 + + + + BPM noise Active/passive isolation Actuator (Kicker) + - Controller Sensor (BPM) Feedback scheme Controller optimized to minimize the PSD of displacement of the beam (∆Y ) in function of the disturbance seismic motion The results of the optimization depend on the considered seismic motion and on the active passive isolation. + + Direct disturbances Efficiency of the feedback scheme: 0 Hz to [4 – 5]Hz (limited by the repetition rate of the beam: 50Hz) It is needed to improve the efficiency of the control 5Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

6. Feedback + Adaptive scheme Position at the IP: ∆Y Seismic motion Y=0 + + + + BPM noise Active/passive isolation Actuator (Kicker) + - Controller Sensor (BPM) + + Direct disturbances Adaptive filter + - Efficiency of the control greatly increased (in the same range: 0 Hz to [4 – 5]Hz) Beam motion still at a detrimental level at 5Hz Specification of the future active/passive isolation Adaptive filter reconstruct and cancel the disturbance 6Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

7. Pattern of a global active/passive isolation ∆Y(q) Seismic motion Y=0 + + + + BPM noise Active/passive isolation (K g ) Actuator (Kicker) + - Controller Sensor (BPM) + + Direct disturbances Adaptive filter + - Resonant frequency f 0 [Hz] Static gain G o Determination of the pattern of the global Active/passive isolation (K g ) Example if we consider K g as a second order low pass filter: Independent from ξ in the range [0.01 – 0.7] 7Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

8. Active/passive isolation Position at the IP: ∆Y Seismic motion (CMS data) Y=0 + + + + BPM noise Actuator (Kicker) + - Controller Sensor (BPM) + + Direct disturbances Adaptive filter + - TMC Table (K 1 ) Mechanical support (K 2 ) ACTIVE/PASSIVE ISOLATION MAGNET = + TMC table (K 1 ) Mechanical support (K 2 ) Feasibility demonstration with industrial products f 0 = 2Hz ξ = 0.01 8Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

9. Integrated RMS displacement [m] Frequency [Hz] PSD [m²/Hz] Frequency [Hz] Results 9Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

10. ξ= 0.01 f 0 = 2 Hz Controller optimized for the PSD of the ground motion filtered by the TMC table + Mechanical support K 2 f 0 = f 0 ± 10% ξ = ξ ± 50% The worst case: f 0 = 2.2 Hz ξ = 0.005 Integrated RMS displacement of the beam 0.1nm @ 0.1Hz Integrated RMS displacement = f(ξ, f0) Integrated RMS [m] Damping ratio: ξ [ ] Resonant frequency: f 0 [Hz] Robustness (Mechanical support) 10Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

11. W: white noise added to the measured displacement BPM’s noise has to be < 13 pm integrated RMS @ 0.1 Hz Integrated RMS displacement = f(W) Robustness (BPM noise) ∆Y(q) Seismic motion Y=0 + + + + BPM noise W(q) Active/Passive isolation Actuator (Kicker) + - Controller Sensor (BPM) + + Direct disturbances Adaptive filter + - BPM noise W [m] Integrated RMS at 0.1 Hz [m] The BPM is a post collision BPM: Amplification of 10 5 11Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

12. Mid-lower magnet 1355mm Elastomeric strips for guidance Piezoelectric actuator below its micrometric screw Lower electrode of the capacitive sensor Fine adjustments for capacitive sensor (tilt and distance) V-support for the magnet Mechanical support for magnet (A. Badel, J-P. Baud, R. Le Breton, G. Deleglise, A. Jérémie, J. Lottin, L. Pacquet) Example with the solution being developed at LAPP 12Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21

13.  Feedback + Adaptive control:  Feasibility demonstration of the beam stabilization proposed  New specification of the active/passive isolation  Future prospects :  Implementation of the controller under placet Conclusions 13Gaël Balik - LAPPIWLC 2010 - CERN - 2010-10-21