Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byReynold Hines Modified over 9 years ago
1
Trend of AMSR-E C-band RFI and plans for AMSR2 Keiji Imaoka Earth Observation Research Center Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency AMSR-E Science Team Meeting Huntsville, AL, USA June 3, 2010
2
Introduction Radio-frequency Interference (RFI) problem has been evident in AMSR-E brightness temperatures at 6.925GHz, particularly over land areas. Two motivations to revisit this issue: –Seeking the possibility of masking RFI areas, as a part of the AMSR-E Level-1 product updates. –Preparation for the AMSR2 RFI flagging algorithm, in combination with the utilization of 7.3GHz. Simple threshold method (Njoku et al. 2005) was applied to 6-years AMSR-E data to check temporal and regional trends of C-band RFI.
3
Trend of Radiometer Sensitivity 3 End of Nominal Ops.89GHz A anomalySwap ADE A to BTorque increase beganGCOM-W1 Launch (into A-Train) Radiometer sensitivity [K]
4
Trend of HTS Temperatures 4 Position in orbit Years 2002/062009/03 Ascent equator crossing Descent equator crossing South pole North pole [K] Physical temperature anomaly of HTS PRTs during June 2002 and June 2008. Red, green, and blue indicate max, average, and minimum, respectively. HTU#1 HTU#2 HTU#3 HTU#4 HTU#5 HTU#6 HTU#7 HTU#8
5
Tb Monitoring over Rain Forests Bitam Maripasoula Putusibau
6
Possible RFI in AMSR-E C-band AMSR-E max-hold Tb map, 6G-H ascending, 2003
7
C-band RFI Identification Papers published by several teams using AMSR- E and Windsat data (e.g. Njoku 2005). AMSR and AMSR-E data analysis in terms of RFI by our team (Arai, IGARSS05). Possible RFI detection methods include: –Spectral or polarization index (or combination) –Time series stability –Directional property –Full polarimetric capability Currently no perfect methods for detecting C- band RFI over land: need some mitigation techniques in future system.
8
Data Processing Simple threshold method like by Njoku et al. 2005. Used Level-1R prototype to compensate spatial resolution mismatch among different frequency channels. Created 0.25 degrees global grids for 2002-2008 data. Derived monthly mean and standard deviation of TB differences between neighboring frequency channels (e.g. TB 06V -TB 10V, TB 10V -TB 18V ). Roughly corrected seasonal variations by subtracting monthly medians in large areas (e.g. United States). Used objective thresholds of 10K (mean) and 5K (standard deviation) to identify possible RFI areas.
9
Directional Property 9 2002/09A AMSR-E observes a certain area from various direction during the 16-day recurrence period. Clear directional property (periodical patterns in time series) can be seen, when the number of emitters within the footprint might be small. Monthly (approx. twice the recurrence period) standard deviation is a reasonable indicator of directional property. Natural variabilities such as snow/ice melting are also mistakenly detected. + +
10
Directional Property Azimuthal properties of man-made radio emissions over two areas in Japan. Upper two panels show AMSR-E brightness temperatures (radial distance) and the observing azimuth angles for the areas near Kofu City (left) and Kitami City (right) in year 2003. Lower two panels show locations of two areas (left) and examle of yearly averaged brightness temperature difference between 6.9GHz and 10.65GHz v-pol channel.
11
Around Saudi Arabia 11
12
Around Saudi Arabia 12
13
Scatter Plot of Differece/Standard Dev. 13 6V-10V: US6V-10V: Europe 10V-18V: US 10V-18V: Europe
14
Identified Possible RFI Areas 14 Europe US S-E Asia Japan Europe US S-E Asia Japan 6.925GHz 10.65GHz
15
Identified Possible RFI Areas (6.9GHz) 15 2002/09A 2007/09A 2002/09A 2007/09A
16
Identified Possible RFI Areas (6.9GHz) 16 2002/09A 2007/09A 2002/09A 2007/09A
17
Day-Night Difference (10.65GHz) 17 2007/09A 2007/09D Daytime Nighttime
18
Aircraft Measurement (2006) Purpose Since detailed information of man-made emission is not available, actual measurements are informative (even though they are limited in terms of place and time). Aircraft Beechcraft Queen-Air (BE65) owned by JAXA Measurement setup –Simple setup without calibration function to obtain rough information of RFI spectrum and distribution. –Log-periodic antenna (Gain=7dBi, H-pol) –RF cable (Loss=2.5dB) –High-pass filter –LNA (Gain=45dB, NF=2.2dB) –Spectrum analyzer (HP8593E) –Personal computer (data acquisition) –Ancillary information (GPS, Video) Experiment parameters –Date: 2005/11/28, 2006/01/16,17,25 –Flight area: See next slide –Altitude: 2.5~3.5km –Frequency: 6-8GHz (5MHz resolution) –Sampling interval: 10 sec (max hold) –Flight speed: ~ 300km/h –Flight hours: ~ 10 hours –Number of spectrum: 3285 total Log-periodic antenna Spectrum Analyzer GPIB High-pass Filter LNA PC GPS Video Window Measurement setup of aircraft observation Experiment platform (Beech Queen-Air) and measurement setup.
19
Aircraft Measurement (2006) GPS tracks of experimental flights over Japan. RFI signals within AMSR-E bandwidth were indicated by red color. Yellow arrows show the measurement direction. AMSR-E maximum TB during from November 13 to 28 (16 days, recurrent period of Aqua) over Japan for 6.9GHz horizontal polarization channel. Figures may indicate possible strong RFI-contaminated areas. [K] ◆ Tokyo ◆ Nagoya ◆ Osaka ◆ Kyoto ◆ Hiroshima ◆ Kagoshima
20
Aircraft Measurement (2006) 20 6GHz ← Frequency → 8GHz → Time (position) → AMSR-E WindSat AMSR-E [K] [dB] Maximum TB during 16 days over Japan for orthogonal polarization channels (V and H) and orbit directions (ascending and descending). Note that periods of data are different for AMSR-E (November 13-28, 2005) and WindSat (October 5-20, 2003). Examples of RFI spectra obtained on November 28 (Kanto Koshinetsu area). Bandwidths of AMSR-E and WindSat are indicated on the figure. It seems that less RFI signals in WindSat bandwidth is consistent with satellite data. AMSR2
21
Preliminary Check of Sub-banding (2006) Due to the resource limitation, 2 sub-bands will be adopted for AMSR2. Current 6.925GHz + Experimental 7.3GHz channel –Probably no improvement of RFI condition, but some RFI flagging can be expected. –Safe to keep the current success of 6.925GHz for measuring SST. Sub band s BW/band Used sub- bands 6.9GHz RFI (%) 7.3GHz RFI (%) Worst T (K) Orig.50 sp.Orig.50 sp. 1350-378312350.34 2175 Flag RFI378312350.34 1665020.48 3117 21564020.42 1~2112010.59 488 31267020.39 2~3230000.48 1~30.212000.68 Preliminary check of sub-band effectiveness for two center frequency cases (6.9 and 7.3 GHz) derived from aircraft measurement on November 28, 2005. Practical configurations were indicated by light-blue cells. Percentages of RFI- contaminated spectra were calculated using original and spatially averaged (50-points moving average) spectra to simulate large satellite footprint. Note that this is just an ideal assessment. Actual rejection and identification of RFI in satellite data need practical algorithm. SB1SB2SB3SB4 TB [K] SB1SB2SB3SB4 TB [K] SB1SB2SB3SB4 TB [K] SB1SB2SB3SB4 TB [K] RFI clearRFI contaminated Possible selectable conditions in case of 2 sub-bands.
22
Summary and Plans for AMSR2 AMSR-E C-band RFI –RFI areas and positions change with time, probably with changes of human utilization of radio spectrum. Clear changes may be visible with radio regulation revisions and replacement of infrastructure. –Static (fixed) RFI mask does not work for C-band RFI over land, but the current AMSR-E channel set is not enough for doing dynamic masking. Post-processing of improved mask is a possible solution. Plans for AMSR2 –7.3GHz chanels will be added to increase information. –Simple RFI flag will be tested using 6.9 and 7.3 GHz, assuming small differences in instruments and real spectrum. Multi-frequency methods may be needed to complement the ***
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.