Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quantitative Cost & Schedule Risk Assessment

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quantitative Cost & Schedule Risk Assessment"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quantitative Cost & Schedule Risk Assessment
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Quantitative Cost & Schedule Risk Assessment NASA - Marshall Space Flight Center Office of Strategic Analysis & Communication Capabilities & Performance Management Office Capabilities & Development Support Team Greg Smith (Smith & Associates, LLC)

2 Background MSFC is one of 10 NASA field centers (leader in SE&I)
OSAC responsibility includes PP&C and Risk Integration PACMO is the PP&C / Schedule Risk process owner C&DS owns schedule, EVM, related risk assessment, integration processes Systems Engineering (SE) is an interdisciplinary field of engineering, that focuses on the development and organization of complex artificial systems. Systems Engineering integrates other disciplines and specialty groups into a team effort, forming a structured development process that proceeds from concept to production to operation and disposal. Systems Engineering considers both the business and the technical needs of all customers, with the goal of providing a quality product that meets the user needs. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Marshall Space Flight Center

3 Quantitative Cost/Schedule Risk Assessment (C/SRA)
Why do it? To determine the probability of finishing on or before a given point in time for a given cost Tasks in a schedule should reflect the “most likely” duration for each task – typically they do not Each task is different and has a varying degree of probability of finishing within the duration specified Schedule risk assessment attempts to quantify these probabilities by assigning values to each task Bridges the gap between CPM scheduling and the project’s need to know the likelihood of “when” A large portion of an effort’s cost is driven by its duration Other factors (resource availability, skill, rate, utilization, political/environmental/organizational factors) can be considered as variables or independently Marshall Space Flight Center

4 Risk Assessment – Basic Process Flow Diagram
Does Schedule Meet Integrity Prerequisites? Event Triggers Need for Risk Assessment Correct Problems No Yes Establish Data Collection Technique(s) Set Minimum, Maximum, Most Likely Durations Collect Data Assign Probability Distribution Curves Evaluate for Special Conditions and Assign Values Perform Risk Analysis Calculations Review Analysis with Stakeholders Analyze Results Marshall Space Flight Center

5 Event Triggers Newly identified Retired existing Existing evolves
Prior to Initial Baseline Reviews Risk change Newly identified Retired existing Existing evolves Scope change Single significant change Successive insignificant changes Key milestones or events Trades or Alternatives being considered Marshall Space Flight Center

6 Schedule Risk Assessment Prerequisites
Impediments to performing an accurate SRA: Constraints (artificially imposed dates) affect risk calculations – takes probability out of the equation Incomplete or inaccurate logic networks (missing relationships between tasks in a schedule) lead to inaccurate representations Missing tasks create incomplete and incorrect results Descriptions should be complete and clear to better enable the assignment of risk parameters Tasks that are too long (i.e. have long durations) lead to results with large ranges Total = $5.3 Billion Marshall Space Flight Center

7 Schedule Risk Assessment
Duration Assignment The original duration specified in the schedule is assumed to be the “most likely” unless specified otherwise The minimum, or optimistic, duration is the least amount of time required or allowed to complete the task, if everything goes perfectly The maximum, or pessimistic, duration is the greatest amount of time required or allowed to complete the task, if everything goes wrong There are various methods for making these determinations Training – joint effort (RS40, SMO, Contracts, etc.) Tailored – start with fundamentals, cover only pertinent subjects. Assessments – some planned, others requested. Consists of “health checks”, IBR’s, float analysis, etc. PM software – wInsight, Risk & Risk+, MSP Central, SAP PS, P3e, Open Plan, etc. EVM model – in progress. Marshall Space Flight Center

8 Schedule Risk Assessment
Duration Assignment Methods for making duration assignments, in order of preference: Data Interview - Evaluate each task independently by collecting data and interviewing personnel and enter each duration manually (preferred method) Historical Data – Collect and evaluate data for the subject project or similar projects (does not address direct & indirect performance issues) Grouping – Assign risk parameters to tasks that share common characteristics (not as accurate, but acceptable) Blanketing – Assign risk parameters with a parametric across the entire project or sections (not very accurate, difficult to validate) Heuristic – Make your best “guess” (no basis or validity) Training – joint effort (RS40, SMO, Contracts, etc.) Tailored – start with fundamentals, cover only pertinent subjects. Assessments – some planned, others requested. Consists of “health checks”, IBR’s, float analysis, etc. PM software – wInsight, Risk & Risk+, MSP Central, SAP PS, P3e, Open Plan, etc. EVM model – in progress. Marshall Space Flight Center

9 Schedule Risk Assessment Probability Distribution Curves (PDC)
Normal (bell shaped) Always symmetrical Beta (skinny bell shaped) Can be symmetrical or asymmetrical Uniform (flat) Triangular (pyramid shaped) Can be symmetrical or asymmetrical Marshall Space Flight Center

10 Schedule Risk Assessment
Special Conditions Probabilistic branching considers the situation where the outcome of a task can result in two or more possible courses of action Conditional branching addresses the impact of external influences, such as weather Marshall Space Flight Center

11 Risk Assessment Calculations
A random sampling method is used by the software tool to select possible duration values in the range between the optimistic and pessimistic duration values Monte Carlo – Speedier method, but has a larger possibility of sampling error Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) – Slower method, reduces sampling error An iteration is one cycle of calculated outcomes (one sample point from each task) These calculations are performed by software – the user specifies the number of iterations Marshall Space Flight Center

12 Schedule Risk Assessment
Results Analysis **Scheduled for 8/22/04** Marshall Space Flight Center

13 Cost Risk Assessment Results Analysis
**Planned for $4.9 M** Marshall Space Flight Center

14 How To Use The Results Have an understanding of the probability of completing by a certain date Use to establish contingency or reserve Monitor the contingency as it gets used Understand where the risk areas are so they can be monitored and proactively managed Sensitivity Analysis Risk Critical Analysis Self-explanatory. Marshall Space Flight Center

15 NASA Presentation Sign-Off Page


Download ppt "Quantitative Cost & Schedule Risk Assessment"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google