1. Using Information for Community Action Kathryn Pettit, The Urban Institute National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership

2. What’s Happening Nationally? Great progress on Open Data – Lots of energy from the private and the public sector Federal place-based work surviving budget pressures – Promise and Choice Neighborhoods Initiatives – Sustainable Communities Initiatives More critical than ever to target neighborhood efforts – Stagnating economy increasing the need for public programs – But local, state, and federal funding is being cut back

3. Identifying the right data to answer questions Transforming raw data into information Communicating findings and insights Advocating for effective & informed policies Implementing the right programs to help residents and neighborhoods What Needs to Be Done Locally?

4. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership Collaborative effort since 1995 Urban Institute and local partners in 35 cities Success required three innovations 1.Data and technology 2.Institutions 3.Using information for change

5. CITY Types of Data Property sales, prices Foreclosures Births, deaths Crime Education TANF, Food Stamps Health Child care Data and Technology Linking people information with place information NEIGHBORHOOD TRACTS PARCEL REGION

6. New Types of Institutions All but one outside of government – Nonprofits, university centers, alliances, funders But partner with resident groups, nonprofits, government, and other stakeholders Long-term and multifaceted interests Positioned to maintain trust of data providers and users

7. Shared Mission: Information for Change Democratizing Information – Facilitate the direct use of data by stakeholders Data serves many varied audiences and purposes But a central focus on strengthening and empowering low-income neighborhoods Information promotes collaboration – Acts as a bridge among public agencies, nonprofits, businesses

8. Shared Mission: Types of Applications Using indicators in local change initiatives – Citywide analysis to change laws and policies – Geographic targeting of resources for programs and investments – Support individual neighborhood improvement initiatives – Support program and policy evaluation Comprehensive community indicator initiatives – Review of indicators across topics to collectively track community quality of life

9. Joint Work Program of the NNIP Partnership Advance the state of practice 1.Informing local policy initiatives (cross-site projects) 2.Developing tools and guides Build/strengthen local capacity 3.Developing capacity in new communities 4.Services to an expanding network Influence national context/partnering 5.Leadership in building the field

10. Using Property-Level Data to Expand Services for Low-Income Elderly in Pittsburgh INDICATORS IN ACTION:

11. Rebuilding Together Pittsburgh 60% of the homes in Pittsburgh were built before 1940 Operation Urgent Care provides free repair services to qualifying homeowners in Allegheny County through the contracted and licensed professionals.

12. Community Block Build Model Strategy to target specific neighborhoods and partner with local community groups Challenges 1.Identifying and selecting low-income neighborhoods 2.Finding seniors in the target area

15. Identified 10 Census Blocks With High Concentrations of Seniors. Located 575 Potential Clients in West Pittsburgh. Received 10 new applications in West Pittsburgh. Completed 2 Block Builds in 2010 in The Hilltop and West Pittsburgh. Early Results

16. Bridging Education And Housing Policy Through Student Data in Washington, D.C. INDICATORS IN ACTION:

17. Highlight Effects of Foreclosure on Children Forced mobility can put kids behind socially and academically Foreclosure prevention counselors should connect families to student services Schools need to understand the patterns and trends of students affected by foreclosure to design appropriate responses.

18. Share of Renter Students in Foreclosure Households Is Increasing Need to provide outreach and counseling for renters (most assistance programs focused on helping homeowners.)

19. Kenilworth: DC Promise Neighborhood Initiative Earlier investment now paying off in planning and fundraising. Five Promises of 1. Caring adults; 2. Physical and emotional safety wherever they are; 3. A healthy start 4. An effective education; 5. Opportunities to help others

20. Using Neighborhood Indicators to Identify Need for Youth Services in Indianapolis INDICATORS IN ACTION:

21. Marion County Commission on Youth EIP Goal: Reduce the number of children entering the county’s child welfare and juvenile justice systems by improving the coordination of youth services in Marion County. Co-location of Services: Organizations serving youth and families in Marion County will partner with community organizations, such as neighborhood centers, schools and churches, to offer various supportive services at common access points.

22. Vulnerability Index: Needs Indicators Single Parent Families Economy - Unemployment  Economy - Poverty Education – Less than HS Diploma Education – Attendance  Health - Teen Births  Health - Births with no Prenatal Care Health - Low Weight Births  Housing – Subsidized Housing  Public Assistance – Food Stamps Public Safety – Adult Crimes Public Safety – Juvenile Charges Weight 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 Index Value Include 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1

23. Vulnerability Index Least Vulnerable (Lowest Need Areas) Most Vulnerable (Greatest Need)

27. 38 th Street

28. www.savi.org

30. Suggestions for NHSDC Members Think about how information might start new conversations and break down silos in your city. – New audiences for your data – External data that would help your work Transform your program data into indicators for neighborhoods and cities to inform others’ work. Connect with your NNIP partner (if you live in an NNIP city) or other local research groups.

31. And visit our new website for ideas!

33. For more information Kathy Pettit NNIP/The Urban Institute kpettit@urban.org http://www.neighborhoodindicators.org