1. Monitoring AT Efficacy Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University

2. What We Know: IDEIA requires that AT devices and services be ‘considered’ when developing IFSPs & IEPs AT consideration process should identify appropriate AT devices for children to perform targeted tasks Data collection regarding AT impact on skill development is necessary to make informed decisions both before and after AT implementation

3. Assistive Technology (AT): A Compensatory Intervention Remember that effective AT allows a student to perform a task that, without the AT, the student would not be able to do. Effective AT results in greater performance on a given task but may not result in a change in the skill level related to the task.

4. Concurrent Time Series Smith (2000) outlined a procedure referred to as the “time series concurrent and differential approach” Involves a series of measures taken over time of a student’s performance on a particular task both with and without the AT. Works best when consistent probes are used to measure and subsequently monitor progress.

5. Process Questions What are possible AT interventions? (Consideration) What tasks are involved? What is the behavior to measure? (Impacted Area of Performance) What is the unit of measurement? What is the measurement method? What is the frequency of measurement?

6. Developing Probes Observable, Measurable, Reliable, Targeted Behavior Common Denominator (e.g., specific time period, number of available attempts)

7. Probe Frequency In General, ▫Probes should be administered at a ratio of 5 to 1 (with AT and without AT) ▫Probes are administered at a higher frequency during a consideration phase than an implementation phase

8. What are the “AT Questions”? Consideration… ▫Is AT needed? ▫Is it a good initial match? ▫How does one AT perform relative to another AT? Implementation and Evaluation ▫Is the AT Working Over Time? ▫Does the AT Continue to be Needed by the Student?

9. Let’s look at some scenarios…

10. Thinking about the potential ‘match’ of AT

11. Performance on Task AT Trial Phase Consideration

12. Performance on Task Consideration AT Trial Phase

13. Performance on Task Consideration AT 1 AT 2 AT 3 AT Trial Phase

14. Performance on Task Consideration AT Trial Phase

15. Investigating the efficacy of AT over time

16. Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

17. Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

18. Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

19. Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

20. Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

21. Benefits of Concurrent Time Series Allows for Data Based Decision Making ▫Provides support for initial need for AT ▫Ensures that the reletive effectiveness of AT over time can be monitored ▫Monitors any ‘side effects’ that may occur during AT use Once established, easy to monitor over time

22. Using the Tool! http://www.seat.ilstu.org/excel

23. Questions