1. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Climate Effects Status and Trends: Linking Science to Resource Management Decision Making and Policy Data Management Workshop Briefing September 16, 2009

2. Issues in Understanding and Responding to Climate Effects  To effectively respond to climate change, we must understand whole-systems and feedback responses  We must understand more than the islands we study or manage: context will matter  To anticipate change, we must focus on system resilience and thresholds: Initial climate effects will be episodic, and by the time a problem is noticed in a specific location it will likely be chronic  We therefore need long-term records and data at the full range of spatial and temporal scales  We need the answers yesterday

3. 3  Funding to start from scratch prohibitive. What structure would allow us to organize existing and new capabilities?  We need long-term records and experiments at fixed sites and short-term site-specific answers.  Current funding is highly distributed. Mechanisms for developing integrated approaches and data are mixed.  We need to meet both national and regional needs for science How do we deal with this?

4. Data Integration – A Critical Need Data Integration: A Critical Need Current monitoring and data collections systems are not well-integrated across DOI Bureaus... let alone across other local, state and federal agencies. We will need data sharing, management, assessment, and access at an unprecedented scale.

5. Chemical, energy, and water budgets to track changes in ecological function The Watershed Approach

6. 6 National Climate Effects Network A vision for a National climate effects early- warning system composed of :  A collaborative multi-scale “network of networks” sharing data to answer more questions than we can answer separately.  Partnerships among operational and research institutions: NSF (NEON, LTER, AON, etc), USFS, DOI, NOAA Climate Services, NGOs  Science support for cost-effective resource management and policy decision-making  Efficient multi-scale performance monitoring and ground-truthing for adaptation and mitigation (e.g. Carbon sequestration)  Support services (data management, communication, etc.)

7. “To develop a national framework for integration and coordination of environmental monitoring and related research through collaboration and building upon existing networks and programs.” Charge Given to CENR by Clinton Administration, July 1996:

8. 8 PROBLEM: It is not possible to assess the complex changes, interactions, and feedbacks caused by climate change at every specific location where resource managers need us to -be, or by separate discipline-specific initiatives. THE NECESSARY ASSUMPTIONS: The dominant processes controlling ecosystem function are similar; however, ecosystem condition is highly variable. The logistical issue

9. The CENR Framework For Environmental Monitoring and Research (Source of the Heinz “Roadmap to the Future”)

10. The Watershed as a Landscape Frame of Reference FIA Plot (hypothetical) USGS Gage Riparian Study Research Area Intensive areas (hypothetical) Survey points (hypothetical)

11. Climate Gradients in the Lower 48 Change will happen first at ecosystem boundaries (ecotones)

12. National Climate Effects Network Surveys CORE study areas (proposed) Survey points (hypothetical) Vegetation Type (FIA) Vegetation Health (FHM) Soil chemistry Wildlife census Surficial Geology Water quality Forest Fragmentation Precipitation and air temperature networks Active layer thickness (north) Proposed Regional Survey Datasets

13. The resulting 224 band layer image is known as an “image cube”. When the data from each band is plotted on a graph, it yields a spectrum. Hallet, USFS AVIRIS Airborne Visible/InfraRed Imaging Spectrometer Remote Sensing: Building new tools through an integrated ground-truthing network

14. Localized Detailed Measurements Spatial Variables Through TimeIf NDVI < 0.40 C fluxes = f(X1, X2, X4) If NDVI >= 0.40 C fluxes = f(X1, X4, X6) C Flux Mapping Model Tree C Flux Maps METHODS: Develop Empirical Models to Predict Carbon Fluxes Spatially and Temporally Northern Great Plains Sagebrush Steppe Kazakh Steppe Boreal?

15. The predictive potential of phenology requires a new data resource—a national network of integrated phenological observations and the tools to access and analyze them at multiple scales. A continental science and monitoring initiative Includes agencies, NGOs, academia, public Target is 30,000K+ observation locations Includes plants + animals, using contemporary + legacy data Includes on-line data entry, maps, downloads Integrates with other science networks Incorporates education: “more kids in the woods” Remote sensing facilitates scaling from ground to atmosphere www.usanpn.org

16. Where we are now:  A National Climate Effects Network (CEN) and National Climate Services are DOI and Congressional expectations.  Pilots of various concepts have sprung up across the US  A coherent strategy that makes efficient use of our national capabilities has not developed at this point.  The time is right for recommendations.

17.  Carbon Sequestration  Water Availability  Water Quality  Increased Flood and Drought Risk  Coastal Impacts Associated with Sea- level Rise  Melting Permafrost and Sea Ice  Impacts on Native Peoples  Outbreaks of Pests, Invasive Species, and Diseases  Species Migration and Habitat Change  Threatened and Endangered Species  Wildland Fires Work has already been done on defining key management and policy issues Many issues, but also common data needs

18. Ecosystem Forecasting Streamgages USGS Geospatial Datasets Carbon Sequestration Assessment USGS D NAWQA NOAA Climate Services Forest Inventory and Analysis (USDA-FS) Decision- Support Center National Climate Change and Wildlife Center NPS Monitoring Programs DATA INTEGRATION FOR CLIMATE EFFECTS CLIMATE EFFECTS NETWORK ENHANCEMENTS Can we integrate services and enhance existing programs to address climate effects?

19. Data Management Vision and Goals (updated from 2008 DOI Framework document) Vision Statement: “To create a data management system through which DOI and its partners can access, assemble, and synthesize ecological data for natural resource management, delivering the right information to the right person at the right time using a standard means of access to authoritative Ecological Resources Data.” Principles:  Cost-effective data management and access to Ecological Resource Data and information.  Optimized Ecological Resources Data management processes and services that are responsive to customer needs.  Productive collaboration in ecological data-related activities and investments across DOI.  Manage the entire ecological data life cycle.  Data synthesis to facilitate usability by all customers.

20. Recommendations 1.Emphasis should be on the modernization of data systems by each bureau using DOI and industry standards that allow efficient searching, discovery, and data sharing. 2.Implement short-term (1 to 3 years) solution to address the immediate need for more efficient data and information management and dissemination across multiple data systems. 3.Build on existing capacity to develop a DOI- wide data and information management and dissemination system (e.g. Modify the Biological Resources Data Management Framework developed in 2008 by a 17-person interagency DOI team)

21. DOI Executive Order DOI Climate Council Formed –Sec, Dep Sec, Bureau Chiefs DOI Climate Impacts Response Centers –Incorporate LCCs, Wildlife Centers, GCPO Apps/Decision Support, etc. –Looking for input on where to locate –Unified set of boundaries (a challenge) –Funding still to the Bureaus directly

22. DOI Executive Order CEN as a science foundation for these centers Coordinated through National Climate Change Program Office at DOI 1 st Council meeting next week Working groups may be re- constituted based on that meeting. MY Conclusion: None of this affects the objectives of this workshop.

23. DOI Executive Order Recommendations: Prepare a white paper on data management and dissemination Goal, strategy, timeline, funding and FTE needs Have ready by mid-October (LCCs and USGS/FWS partnership on that schedule.

24. Discussion

25. DATA MANAGEMENT TEAM Steve Fancy (Chair), David Wilson, Cheryl Morris, Craig MacKinnon, Tim Moriarty Key Challenges:  Data and information sharing and integration are the key to collaboration among DOI bureaus and their many partners in addressing the significant climate change challenges.  Developing an effective and efficient means of finding, retrieving, using, and sharing the best available data and information. This will require both a top-down and bottom-up approach to addressing Department-wide data management issues.  The key to data sharing and integration is modernization of data systems using reusable and sharable building blocks (“web services”) based on DOI and industry standards to allow data exchange across multiple data systems.

26. Vision Statement: “To provide earth system information for understanding, tracking, and forecasting the effects of climate change on ecosystems, natural resources, and society; and to develop and assess adaptation or mitigation responses to those changes in the most cost effective, timely, and scientifically-rigorous manner possible.” Principles:  Begin with users’ needs  Sound decisions are based on sound science  Information producers and users will collaborate across the entire process  Integration of science and management requires an adaptive approach and processes that encourage and apply learning  We will build connections across disciplines and organizations  We will ensure institutional stability Guiding Principals for Collaborative Observation, Research, and Decision Support

27. Climate Effects Support Services  Data management and dissemination systems  Common protocol development and data comparability screening  Adaptation and mitigation strategy development  Communication and outreach

29. The Climate Effects Dilemma  Valuable historical records are available but scattered, so system-level observation is poor.  Most science funding is short-term.  How climate change will disrupt ecosystem function and human activity is uncertain.  Answers to relevant management issues are needed now in many areas, and very soon in many others, but we don’t know what adaptation or mitigation strategies will work.

30. Map of real-time streamflow compared to historical streamflow for the day of the year (United States)

31. An Earth Systems Science Agency (Addressing serious environmental and economic challenges in the United States will require organizational changes at the federal level) Mark Schaefer (DOI), D. James Baker (NOAA), John H. Gibbons (OSTP), Charles G. Groat (USGS), Donald Kennedy (FDA), Charles F. Kennel (NASA), David Rejeski (OSTP-CEQ) POLICYFORUM- Science July 2008