Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Computer Practical: Numerical Gasdynamics Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Group 6 Comparison of Results with Different Grid Points 2 nd Order Roe Naseem.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Computer Practical: Numerical Gasdynamics Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Group 6 Comparison of Results with Different Grid Points 2 nd Order Roe Naseem."— Presentation transcript:

1 Computer Practical: Numerical Gasdynamics Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Group 6 Comparison of Results with Different Grid Points 2 nd Order Roe Naseem Uddin Lucy Gray

2 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability –Introduction –Results –Conclusions –Questions?

3 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Introduction: Definition “The Richtmyer-Meshkov instability arises when a shock wave interacts with an interface separating two different fluids.” –Theoretically Predicted: Richtmyer 1960 –Experimentally observed: Meshkov 1969 –Simulation:Good test case for: – CFD validation. –Investigation into effects of differing parameters on results, e.g, grid size, time step size, flux functions… etc…

4 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Introduction: Basic configuration –Two fluids initially at rest with differing properties, e.g. different densities –Separated by interface with an initial perturbation –Normal shock wave ( travelling from top to bottom from Fluid 1 into Fluid 2) From: M. Brouillette, The Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 445-68 (2002) interfaceshock

5 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Introduction:Development a)Initial configuration b)Linear growth with time – crests and troughs are symmetric c)Start of nonlinear evolution – asymmetric spike and bubble development d)Roll-up of spike e)Emergence of small-scales and turbulent mixing From: M. Brouillette, The Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 445-68 (2002)

6 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Simulation: Euler 2D code –MUSCL Technique –2 nd Order in space & time –Temporal evolution & spatial reconstruction –Eulerian remapping & slope limiting (minmod)

7 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Results: Computing Time Grid size:coarsefineRatio (fine:coarse) 300 x 198600 x 3964 Computing Time: 1318.98 sec11138.5 sec8.4 CPU time:2 808 sec16 884 sec Intel Pentium single processor 512 MB Ram, 1.6 GHz 6

8 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Structure details – Generated Vortices Coarse grid simulation The vortex structures are due to baroclinic vorticity at the interface. 0 time step 20 time steps 60 time steps 100 time steps

9 Vortices are only clear with fine grids Secondary vortex Mushroom shaped vortex

10 Two pairs of counter rotating vortices in the Mushrom-shaped structure. As time increases two more counter rotating structures appear. Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Structure details Generated Vortices Fine Grid Simulation

11 Structure details – mesh comparison Fine Coarse 0 time step 20 time steps 40 time steps

12 Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Conclusion: Structure details –Limited spatial resolution  failure to resolve smaller scales Further Work: –Effects of flux function on structures –Expansion to 3D –Expectation of different structures

13 Thank you for your attention. Further questions?


Download ppt "Computer Practical: Numerical Gasdynamics Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Group 6 Comparison of Results with Different Grid Points 2 nd Order Roe Naseem."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google