1. Tom Ivar Barka Lead Planner at Bergen Group Rosenberg Bergen Group tom-ivar.barka@bergengroup.no November, 2012

2. Employees

3. Activities and their R-Fields Calendars (for timephasing) Activities Table (to compare) AO Table PO Table DocPkg (DP) Table Doc. Table Oper Table Eng. Obj. Table Compare AO Table PO Table DP Table Activities Act.Table [Level 5] [Level 4] Oper Table Doc Table [Level 6] Eng. Obj. Table

5. Act – Engineering Objects, and their milestones

6. Act – DocPkgs - Documents

7. Act – POs - Operations

8. The 3 activities expanded at the same time.

9. And then turn on and off what you need to see

10. Can be exported to various other formats than pdf

11. On Level 4 and Level 5 data

12. Makes a planners life easier

13. Projects/Tenders MainCat List Discipline List Activities TimeCatcher Formula MPP Projects Activities Actual Hrs for activitiesManpower availability History Monthly Snapshots of MainCat aggreated data History Detail history (Transparent Reports) Scenario Data Safran Data

14. Drill down from Project level to activit y level, show changes relative last month

15. Pivot on the delta to see changes (per MainCat) relative last month

16. Show historic tracking as well as live forecast.

17. Compare resource availability with demand for a selected set of activities

18. True history is shown together with live plan

19. 4 Key features of the solution: 1.Drill-Down Portfolio Overview with KPI values derived from lowest level data. 2.Generate Historical Tracking of Earned Value Metrics (Scope, Actuals, Earned) at aggregated level (*). Show in histogram together with forecast data from live plan. 3.Pulling data from resident MPP (Manpower Projection System) to get correlation between demand and supply of resources. 4.(*) A «Report Container» will be saved at each cutoff (Month) to allow revisiting detail status at later time – and create audit trails. The concept of storing histotoric data at aggregated level makes system «lean» (adds to performance) while the option is open to revisit any point in history with the «same Proteus UI» with full details and reporting options.

21. Manual Items Weight Factors User Overrides Comp Format PDMS Data Manual Items View

22. Weight and Cost Drill Down into details from project and discipline

23. Allows deriving Gross Weights

24. Allows deriving costs

25. Raw (measurement) Data from PDMS

26. Compensated Hours pr Discipline/Phase

27. Using Proteus to combine PDMS data with Comp Schedule to do cost and weight reports