1. The use of credits and fields of education in tertiary education - the Finnish method

2. 7.6.20072Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Content Detecting changes in quality Quality in tertiary education Why not outcome based quality corrections? Results Need of improvement

3. 7.6.20073Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Detecting changes in quality Aim to detect quality by product grouping Weighting on information of prod. costs Aim to transform internal quality to structural quality new products as new groups means changes in classification in time to time tries to avoid the problems of outcome indicators

4. 7.6.20074Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Why not outcome based quality corrections? Problems of outcome corrections effects of other factors not tracked is not evaluated in market production of education complicates the compilation of national accounts Outcome is not a concept in national accounts Used coefficient of outcome corrections is a normative element and not observed state of balance sheets Does the outcome corrections bring more information from economy for decision making

5. 7.6.20075Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Quality in tertiary education - product groups

6. 7.6.20076Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Quality in tertiary education - cost shares

7. 7.6.20077Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Results - polytechnic education

8. 7.6.20078Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Results - university education

9. 7.6.20079Jani Heikkinen and Sami Hautakangas Need of improvement Classification from domestic fields of education to ISCED more classes to polytechnic education Detailed data from the costs at the same lave as output Data of quality aspects of output needed even if not summed with actual output crucial to evaluate used classification Need of data FASTER CHEAPER