Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySteven Wheeler Modified over 9 years ago
1
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275JSP Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing Gabrielle H. Saunders, PhD; Melissa T. Frederick, AuD; Michelle Arnold, AuD; ShienPei Silverman; Theresa H. Chisolm, PhD; Paula Myers, PhD
2
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275JSP Aim – Assess auditory difficulties in 99 blast-exposed Veterans using self-report and performance-based measures. Relevance – Vast numbers of blast-injured Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation New Dawn personnel report postconcussive symptoms (headache, dizziness, poor memory, and difficulty concentrating). – Additionally, many report hearing problems yet have no measurable auditory deficits.
3
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275JSP Method All participants reported auditory problems in difficult listening situations but had clinically normal hearing. Self-report measure: Functional Hearing Questionnaire. Behavioral measures: – Speech, Spatial, and Qualities Questionnaire. – Hearing in Noise Test. – North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentence Test. – Adaptive Tests of Temporal Resolution. – Modified Digit Span Test. – Time Compressed Speech Test. – Staggered Spondaic Word Test. – Woodcock Johnson Story Recall. – Stroop Color and Word Test.
4
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275JSP Results Scores on self-report questionnaires were more similar to scores of older individuals wit hearing impairment than to those of younger individuals with normal hearing. Participants showed deficits relative to published normative data on a number of performance-based tests that have demonstrated sensitivity to auditory processing deficits. More than the expected number of participants (15.9%) performed ≥1 standard deviations below the mean on several measures (speech understanding in noise, binaural processing, temporal resolution, and speech segregation). However, performance was not universally poor, with approximately 53% of participants performing abnormally on between 3 and 6 of the 10 measures.
5
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275JSP Conclusion Participants exhibited task-specific deficits that add to the evidence suggesting that blast injury results in damage to the central auditory system.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.