Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President."— Presentation transcript:

1 THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President

2 What is the PRR? Major accreditation event Major accreditation event 5 years after self study 5 years after self study Retrospective, current, and prospective analysis Retrospective, current, and prospective analysis Evidence of ongoing compliance with: Evidence of ongoing compliance with: –Title IV HEOA regulations (see Certification Statement) –Requirements of Affiliation –Standards for Accreditation

3 Major sections of the PRR Executive summary Executive summary Response to all self study recommendations Response to all self study recommendations Major challenges/opportunities Major challenges/opportunities Enrollment & financial data Enrollment & financial data Assessment evidence Assessment evidence Planning & budgeting Planning & budgeting

4 Peer review procedures 2 peer reviewers, 1 financial reviewer 2 peer reviewers, 1 financial reviewer Suggestions – collegial advice Suggestions – collegial advice Recommendations – improvement advised to remain in compliance Recommendations – improvement advised to remain in compliance Requirements – institution is out of compliance with 1 or more Standards Requirements – institution is out of compliance with 1 or more Standards Institution has an opportunity to provide a formal response Institution has an opportunity to provide a formal response

5 Possible Commission actions Reaffirm accreditation Reaffirm accreditation –sometimes with commendation Request follow-up Request follow-up –progress report or monitoring report Warning Warning Probation Probation Postponement Postponement

6 What happened during the 2011 PRR review? 51 institutions submitted PRRs 51 institutions submitted PRRs 44 affirmed 44 affirmed 18 commendations 18 commendations 11 progress reports (22% of institutions) 11 progress reports (22% of institutions) 12 monitoring reports (24% of institutions) 12 monitoring reports (24% of institutions) 5 Warnings; 1 Probation; 1 Postponement 5 Warnings; 1 Probation; 1 Postponement

7 Standards requiring the most follow-up Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning (76% of follow-up requests) Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning (76% of follow-up requests) Standard 7: Institutional Assessment (40% of follow-up requests) Standard 7: Institutional Assessment (40% of follow-up requests) Standard 3: Institutional Resources (24% of follow-up requests) Standard 3: Institutional Resources (24% of follow-up requests) Standard 8: Student Admissions and Retention (16% of follow-up requests) Standard 8: Student Admissions and Retention (16% of follow-up requests)

8 Need Assistance? PRR Workshop – every Spring PRR Workshop – every Spring Handbook for Periodic Review Reports, 12 th edition, 2011; available at www.msche.org Handbook for Periodic Review Reports, 12 th edition, 2011; available at www.msche.org www.msche.org Contact your MSCHE liaison Contact your MSCHE liaison

9 QUESTIONS?


Download ppt "THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google