1. COMMUNITY PROFILE: WASHINGTON COUNTY, NOWATA COUNTY & BARTLESVILLE 2015 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission June 2015

3. Overview 3  Population shifting demographically  Well-being of children not so well  Many strive for “living wage”… and many must rely on public assistance to fill the gap  Continuing impact of social determinants of health

4. DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS 4

5. Population Estimates: Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville, 2014 5 Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates 2014.

6. Population Trends and Projections: Washington and Nowata Counties, 1980 to 2050 6 Source: Oklahoma Department of Commerce, “2012 Demographic State of the State Report: Oklahoma State and County Population Projections through 2075”; US Census Bureau, Decennial Censuses. projections

7. Population Trends and Projections by Age Group: Oklahoma, 1970-2030 Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses; Oklahoma Department of Commerce, 2012 Demographic State of the State Report: Oklahoma State and County Population Projections through 2075. projectio ns

8. Population Trends by Age Group: Washington County, 1990 - 2013 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, 2013 Population Estimates.

9. Population Trends by Age Group: Nowata County, 1990 - 2013 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, 2013 Population Estimates.

10. Population Trends by Age Group: Bartlesville, 2000 - 2013 Source: US Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey.

11. Race Comparison for Total Population and Young Children: Washington County, 2013 Estimates 11 Total population = 51,577 Source: Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic Origin for Counties, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.” Under 5 population = 3,291

12. Race Comparison for Total Population and Young Children: Nowata County, 2013 Estimates 12 Total population = 10,580 Source: Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic Origin for Counties, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.” Under 5 population = 739

13. Race Comparison for Total Population and Young Children: Bartlesville, 2013 Estimates 13 Total population = 36,035 Source: Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. Under 5 population = 2,471

14. FAMILY, CHILDREN AND YOUTH 14

15. Family 15

16. Family Type for Children under Age 5 by Race and Ethnicity, Washington County, 2009-13 16 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey.

17. Family Type for Children under Age 5 by Race and Ethnicity, Nowata County, 2009-13 17 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. na

18. Family Type for Children under Age 5 by Race and Ethnicity, Bartlesville, 2009-13 18 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey.

19. Children in Non-Traditional Settings: Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville, 2009-13 19 Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census, Table QT-P12 and QT-P13; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey, Table B09018. living with:group quarters (2010 data):

20. Subfamilies, by type, Nowata County, Washington County, and Bartlesville, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey.

21. Living Arrangements of Persons 65 & Over, Washington County, Nowata County and Bartlesville, 2009-2013 21 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey.

22. Summary of Risk Factors for Infants: Washington & Nowata Counties, 2013 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics 2013, OK2SHARE, accessed on 2/3/15. Total births: Nowata County = 117 Washington County = 625 22

23. Characteristics of Births to Teens (age 15-19): Washington & Nowata Counties, 2013 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics 2013, OK2SHARE, accessed on 2/3/15. Washington County: Total teen births = 48 Age-specific fertility rate = 30.7 /1,000 females age 15-19 Nowata County: Total teen births = 9 Age-specific fertility rate = 27.0 /1,000 females age 15-19 23

24. Resident Births to Women under Age 20, Washington and Nowata Counties, 1980-2013 24 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

25. Age-Specific Birth Rates for Women under Age 20, Washington and Nowata Counties, 1980-2013 25 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

26. Births by Trimester of Entry into Prenatal Care: Washington County, 1980 to 2013 26 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

27. Births by Trimester of Entry into Prenatal Care: Nowata County, 1980 to 2013 27 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

28. Births by Marital Status of Mother: Washington County, 1980 to 2013 28 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

29. Births by Marital Status of Mother: Nowata County, 1980 to 2013 29 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

30. Infant Mortality Rates (5-year averages): Washington County, Nowata County, and State of Oklahoma, 1980 to 2013 30 Healthy People 2020 goal: 6.0 Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

31. 31 Occupied Housing Units by Tenure, Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville, 2009-2013 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey.

32. Children and youth 32

33. Oklahoma Rankings on Indicators of Child Well-being 33 Indicator Oklahoma rank Best State (#1) Worst State (#50) Overall child well- being 36 New HampshireNew Mexico Economic well-being25 North DakotaMississippi Education40 MassachusettsNevada Health43 MaineMontana Family and Community 39 New HampshireMississippi Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

34. Oklahoma Rankings on Specific Child Indicators 34 IndicatorU.S. rateOklahoma rate Oklahoma rank Best rank Median family income$58,000$49,400750 Children in poverty23% 301 Children below 200% poverty45%49%351 Population in poverty16%17%331 Children 3 & 4 not enrolled in preschool54%59%341 Population 25-34 not high school graduate12%13%361 Children living in concentrated poverty12% 341 Children in single parent families35%36%301 Children living with neither parent5%6%411 Low birth weight babies8.1%8.4%301 Children confirmed victims of maltreatment 9/1,0008/1,000191 Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

35. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study Pyramid 35 Conception Death Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

36. Adverse Childhood Experiences…  Recurrent physical abuse  Recurrent emotional abuse  Sexual abuse  An alcohol or drug abuser  An incarcerated household member  Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill  Mother being treated violently  Living with one or neither parent  Emotional or physical neglect  Smoking  Overeating  Physical inactivity  Heavy alcohol use  Drug use  Promiscuity 36  Nicotine addiction  Alcoholism  Drug addiction  Obesity  Depression  Suicide  Injuries  Unintentional pregnancy  Adolescent pregnancy  Heart disease  Cancer  Chronic lung and liver disease  Stroke  Diabetes  Fetal death  Sexually transmitted diseases Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”

37. Adverse Childhood Experiences: Oklahoma 37 Source: Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy, “Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007;” Annie E. Casey Foundation,“KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.” Parental divorce or separation5.2 divorce and annulment/1,000 residents Children in single parent families36% of children Children living with neither parent6% of children Incarcerated household member47.7 index crimes/1,000 residents Mentally ill household member11.0% psychological distress rate Substance abusing household member5.1% substance abuse rate Violence against mother16.3 protective orders files/1,000 adult women Psychological, physical & sexual abuse or neglect 8 child maltreatment confirmations/1,000 children

38. Adverse Childhood Experiences County Rankings 38 Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst *Indicates a tie with at least one other county. Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy Washington County Nowata County Parental separation or divorce 5313 Incarcerated household member 6228 Mentally ill household member 30* Substance abusing household member 31* Violence against mother 1745 Psychological, physical & sexual abuse 4144 Emotional & physical neglect 4821 Overall ranking 5026

39. DHS Licensed Child Care Services Provided to Children Under Age 5, by Age: Washington County, FY 2004 & 2014 39 Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, 2014 Annual Report.

40. DHS Licensed Child Care Services Provided to Children Under Age 5, by Age: Nowata County, FY 2004 & 2014 40 Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, 2014 Annual Report.

41. DHS Child Care Licensed Facilities and Capacity, by Type: Washington County, FY 2014 41 FacilitiesCapacity Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, 2014 Annual Report.

42. DHS Child Care Licensed Facilities and Capacity, by Type: Nowata County, FY 2014 42 FacilitiesCapacity Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, 2014 Annual Report.

43. Three and Four Year Old Early Childhood (pre-k) Enrollment: Washington County School Districts, October 2013 43 Three year old Pre-KFour year old Pre-K Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education. Three year old half-day pre-k data not available for Caney Valley

44. Three and Four Year Old Early Childhood (pre-k) Enrollment: Nowata County School Districts, October 2013 44 Three year old Pre-KFour year old Pre-K Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education. Three year old pre-k data not available for Nowata County school districts

45. Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Students Enrolled in Special Education: Washington County by School District, School Year 2013-14 45 Average Daily MembershipPercent in Special Education Source: Oklahoma Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, “Profiles 2014 District Reports.” Washington County total ADM = 8,894 Percent in special education = 13.1%

46. Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Students Enrolled in Special Education: Nowata County by School District, School Year 2013-14 46 Average Daily MembershipPercent in Special Education Source: Oklahoma Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, “Profiles 2014 District Reports.” Nowata County total ADM = 1,894 Percent in special education = 13.5%

47. Educational Indicators, High School Class of 2014: Washington County School Districts 47 Washington County total Bartlesville Caney Valley CopanDewey 4-year dropout rate 6.2%6.0%0.0%8.3%8.8% Avg. freshman grad. rate (county)/cohort graduation rate (districts, SY2013-14) 88.6%90%94%65%90% Career Tech participation rate 27.3%24.4%60.0%15.7%29.8% College-bound curriculum 75.7%80.3%93.2%31.8%70.0% Out-of-state college rate 34.9%48.0%9.1%4.6%10.8% OK college going rate 42.1%44.0%34.7%41.5%38.5% 3 rd grade reading proficiency (2013-14) 84%88%78%58%83% Source: Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, “Profiles 2014 State Report;” “Profiles 2014 District Report;” Oklahoma State Department of Education, “A-F Report Card, 2013-14.”

48. Educational Indicators, High School Class of 2014: Nowata County School Districts 48 Nowata County total Nowata Oklahoma Union South Coffeyville 4-year dropout rate 2.9%4.2%2.3%0.0% Avg. freshman grad. rate (county)/cohort graduation rate (districts, SY2013-14) 102.0%87%>95% Career Tech participation rate 51.1%50.0%62.8%33.3% College-bound curriculum 71.3%50.7%95.4%87.5% Out-of-state college rate 19.9%7.3%23.3%50.0% OK college going rate 28.1%37.4%26.3%7.6% 3 rd grade reading proficiency (2013-14) 89%85%94%92% Source: Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, “Profiles 2014 State Report;” “Profiles 2014 District Report;” Oklahoma State Department of Education, “A-F Report Card, 2013-14.”

49. Percentage of 4 th graders not proficient in reading by race and Hispanic origin: United states: 2011 49 Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

51. Child Abuse and Neglect: State of Oklahoma, Washington County and Nowata County, FY2014 Oklahoma Washington County Nowata County Alleged victims (reports accepted for investigation or assessment) 36,736514137 Confirmed victims 14,17215558 …of Abuse 2,328276 …of Neglect 10,12310250 … of Both abuse & neglect 1,721262 Child abuse/neglect rate per 1,000 children 15.012.823.7 Notes: An “alleged victim” represents a report of child abuse and/or neglect accepted by OKDHS for investigation or assessment, and may include multiple children. Each “confirmed victim” of child abuse and/or neglect indicates one child. Since a child may be confirmed abused and/or neglected multiple times in a year, “confirmed victims” is not an unduplicated count of children. Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Report Tables.

54. Juvenile Arrests by Type of Crime: Washington County, 2001-13 54 Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports. Murder, Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault, Burglary, Larceny, and Motor Vehicle Theft All drug arrests reported as Sale/Manufacturing and Possession Driving Under the Influence, Liquor Law Violations, and Drunkenness Other Assaults, Disorderly Conduct, Curfew & Loitering, Runaway, and all other non-traffic offenses A total of 137 juvenile arrests were made in Washington County in 2013, for a rate of 25.4 per 1,000 juveniles age 10-17, down from 241 arrests and a rate of 42.0 in 2001

55. Juvenile Arrests by Type of Crime: Nowata County, 2001-13 55 Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports. Murder, Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault, Burglary, Larceny, and Motor Vehicle Theft All drug arrests reported as Sale/Manufacturing and Possession Driving Under the Influence, Liquor Law Violations, and Drunkenness Other Assaults, Disorderly Conduct, Curfew & Loitering, Runaway, and all other non-traffic offenses A total of 7 juvenile arrests were made in Nowata County in 2013, for a rate of 6.1 per 1,000 juveniles age 10-17, down from 14 arrests and a rate of 11.0 in 2001

56. Economic indicators 56

57. Labor force participation 57 NEED PICTURE

58. Unemployment Rates: Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville,1990 to 2014 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

59. Labor Force Participation for Persons Age 16 and over: Oklahoma, Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville, 2009-13 59 In labor force EmployedUnemployed Not in labor force NumberRate Oklahoma1,834,3661,686,404127,8426.91,116,417 Washington County 24,24222,5581,6846.916,341 Nowata County 4,6494,17147810.33,731 Bartlesville17,03916,0071,0326.111,375 Source: US Census Bureau, 2011-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

60. School and Employment Status of Youth Age 16 to 19: Washington County, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. 60 Not enrolled in school, and either unemployed or not in labor force Total population age 16 to 19 = 2,665

61. School and Employment Status of Youth Age 16 to 19: Nowata County, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. 61 Not enrolled in school, and either unemployed or not in labor force Total population age 16 to 19 = 571

62. School and Employment Status of Youth Age 16 to 19: Bartlesville, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. 62 Not enrolled in school, and either unemployed or not in labor force Total population age 16 to 19 =1,951

63. Employment Status of Youth Age 20 to 24: Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville, 2009- 2013 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. 63

64. Employees by Job Type and Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics, Washington County, 2011 64 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2011).

65. Employees by Job Type and Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics, Bartlesville, 2011 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2011).

66. 66 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2011). Employees by Job Type and Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics, Nowata County, 2011

67. Living wage and poverty 67

68. Comparison of Self-Sufficiency Wage to Poverty Guidelines, by Size of Family: Washington County, 2015 68 Family Size Self-Sufficiency Wage (annual) Poverty Guidelines (annual) Dollar Difference Self- Sufficiency Percent of Poverty One person $17,405 ($8.24/hour) $11,770 ($5.57/hour) $5,635148% Two persons $27,902 ($13.21/hour) $15,930 ($7.54hour) $11,972175% Three persons $32,527 ($15.40/hour) $20,090 ($9.51/hour) $12,437162% Four persons $40,456 ($19.16/hour) $24,250 ($11.48/hour) $16,206167% Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2015, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb. 2015.

69. Wage Comparison: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty and 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income: Family of Three, Washington County 2015 69 Self-sufficiency wage: $32,527 ($15.40/hour) Female-headed families Male-headed families Married couple families All families Annual wage Notes: For self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one school-age child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year- round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Median family income represents families with children under age 18. Values shown for median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2015, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb. 2015; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

70. Monthly Budget Distribution for 2 Adults + 1 Preschooler, and 1 School Age Child, Self-Sufficiency Wage: Washington County, 2015 70 …with tax credit of $123 Self-sufficiency wage = $2,711 per month Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb. 2015.

71. Comparison of Self-Sufficiency Wage to Poverty Guidelines, by Size of Family: Nowata County, 2015 71 Family Size Self-Sufficiency Wage (annual) Poverty Guidelines (annual) Dollar Difference Self- Sufficiency Percent of Poverty One person $17,362 ($8.22/hour) $11,770 ($5.57/hour) $5,592148% Two persons $27,224 ($12.89/hour) $15,930 ($7.54hour) $11,294171% Three persons $32,044 ($15.17/hour) $20,090 ($9.51/hour) $11,954160% Four persons $40,127 ($19.00/hour) $24,250 ($11.48/hour) $15,877165% Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2015, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mar. 2015.

72. Wage Comparison: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty and 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income: Family of Three, Nowata County 2015 72 Self-sufficiency wage: $32,044 ($15.17/hour) Female-headed families Male-headed families Married couple families All families Annual wage Notes: For self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one school-age child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year- round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Median family income represents families with children under age 18. Values shown for median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2015, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mar. 2015; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

73. Monthly Budget Distribution for 2 Adults + 1 Preschooler, and 1 School Age Child, Self-Sufficiency Wage: Nowata County, 2015 73 …with tax credit of $132 Self-sufficiency wage = $2,670 per month Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mar. 2015.

74. 74 Median Family Income by Family Type and Presence of Children: Washington County, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

75. 75 Median Family Income by Family Type and Presence of Children: Bartlesville, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

76. 76 Ratio of Income to Poverty by Age: Washington County, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

77. Number of Persons Living Below 100%, 185% and 200% of Poverty Level, by Age: Washington County, 2009-13 Population Cohort All income levels 100% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Washington County Total population 50,4687,44717,470 Under 18 11,9322,7975,422 Under 6 3,8971,1712,193 65 and older 9,0316822,755 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

78. 78 Ratio of Income to Poverty by Age: Nowata County, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

79. Number of Persons Living Below 100%, 185% and 200% of Poverty Level, by Age: Nowata County, 2009-13 Population Cohort All income levels 100% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Nowata County Total population 10,3521,7144,175 Under 18 2,4915491,224 Under 6 755187374 65 and older 1,820199714 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

80. 80 Ratio of Income to Poverty by Age: Bartlesville, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

81. Number of Persons Living Below 100%, 185% and 200% of Poverty Level, by Age: Bartlesville, 2009-13 Population Cohort All income levels 100% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Bartlesville Total population 35,3615,64412,226 Under 18 8,3872,1843,896 Under 6 2,8578781,574 65 and older 6,2075151,685 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

82. 82 Trends in Ratio of Income to Poverty: Washington County, 1989, 1999, and 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

83. Number of Persons Living Below 100%, 185% and 200% of Poverty Level: Washington County, 1989, 1999, and 2009-13 Year All income levels 100% of poverty level 185% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Washington County 198947,3135,13811,79713,270 199948,2255,73913,89415,340 2009-1350,4687,44716,10817,470 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

84. 84 Trends in Ratio of Income to Poverty: Nowata County, 1989, 1999, and 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

85. Number of Persons Living Below 100%, 185% and 200% of Poverty Level: Nowata County, 1989, 1999, and 2009-13 Year All income levels 100% of poverty level 185% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Nowata County 19899,7532,0374,2764,685 199910,3311,4543,7174,033 2009-1310,3521,7143,9414,175 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

86. 86 Trends in Ratio of Income to Poverty: Bartlesville, 1989, 1999, and 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

87. Number of Persons Living Below 100%, 185% and 200% of Poverty Level: Bartlesville, 1989, 1999, and 2009-13 Year All income levels 100% of poverty level 185% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Bartlesville 198933,7153,7287,8028,783 199934,1054,3179,91710,926 2009-1335,3615,64411,33112,226 Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

88. Poverty Rates by Family Type: Washington County, 2009-13 88 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

89. Poverty Rates by Family Type: Bartlesville, 2009-13 89 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

90. Role of education 90

91. Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & over: Washington County, Nowata County, and Bartlesville, 2009-13 91 Source: US Census Bureau, 2009-13 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population. These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)

92. Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment: United States, 1973-2012 92 Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14. $29.56 $24.46 $18.06 $16.77 $14.63 $37.34 $28.28 $17.30 $15.78 $11.75

93. 93 Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14. $25.30 $19.10 $13.79 $12.76 $10.31 $31.55 $24.21 $15.53 $13.70 $10.06 Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment among Women: United States, 1973-2012

94. Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14. $31.07 $27.97 $20.73 $20.27 $17.10 $43.42 $32.54 $19.20 $17.41 $12.75 Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment among Men: United States, 1973-2012

95. Program participation 95

96. Unduplicated Participation in Public Assistance Programs: Washington County 96 Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Report Tables; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2013-14; US Census Bureau, 2013 Population Estimates; Oklahoma State Dept of Health-WIC service, Caseload Report, Jan. 2015; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Feb. 2015, and 2014 Annual Report. 23.3% 43.9% 33.3% 10.5% 6.8% 6.0%.8% 50.5% 9.5% FY2014 2/2015 6/2015 SY2013/14 1/2015 6/2015

97. Unduplicated Participation in Public Assistance Programs: Nowata County 97 Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Report Tables; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2013-14; US Census Bureau, 2013 Population Estimates; Oklahoma State Dept of Health-WIC service, Caseload Report, Feb.2015; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Apr. 2015, and 2014 Annual Report. 27.8% 52.9% na 10.7% 18.1% 2.3% 61.8% 11.0% FY2014 4/2015 SY2013/14 2/2015 FY2014

98. Free and Reduced Lunch Participation in Elementary Schools: Washington County, & Nowata County by School District, 2013-14 School Year 98 Source: Oklahoma State Dept of Education, Low Income Report for 2013-14. 3-person household eligibility: free lunch = 130% of poverty = $26,117 reduced lunch = 185% of poverty = $37,166 Bartlesville Public Schools Nowata County Washington County

99. Health Status 99 Health rankings Health insurance coverage

100. Overall Health Status Ranking: Oklahoma, 1990-2013 100 Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”

101. Oklahoma’s Rankings in Health Determinants, 2013 101 Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.” 1=Healthiest state 50=Least healthy state Behaviors Policy & Clinical Care Community & Environment

102. Oklahoma’s Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2013 102 Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.” 1=Healthiest state 50=Least healthy state

103. Low Health Status: Oklahoma and United States, 1996-2013 103 Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.” Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in weighting and sampling.

104. Obesity Prevalence: Oklahoma and United States, 1990-2013 104 Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.” Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in weighting and sampling.

105. Smoking Prevalence: Oklahoma and United States, 1990-2013 105 Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.” Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in sampling methodology.

106. 106 Percent of Population Uninsured, by Age Group: Oklahoma, October 2014 Source: Oklahoma Health Care Authority, “Oklahoma Uninsured Fast Facts,” October 2014.

107. 107 Adult and Child Population by Health Insurance Status: Oklahoma, 2014 Source: Oklahoma Health Care Authority, “Oklahoma Uninsured Fast Facts,” October 2014.

108. 108 Percent of Population Uninsured, by Age Group: Washington County, 2009-13 Source: US Census Bureau, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates.

109. 109 Percent of Population Uninsured, by Age Group: Nowata County, 2009-13 Source: 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

110. 110 Percent of Population Uninsured, by Age Group: Bartlesville, 2009-13 Source: 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

111. …In Summary 111

112. Best Practices Strategies 112  Outcome performance measures  Community coalitions  Collaborative, public-private partnerships  Consumer/client investments  Successful outreach and recruitment  Case management/Care coordination  Strong social marketing  Risk reduction education  Access to services and care  Child care  Transportation  Translation

113. COMMUNITY PROFILE 2015: WASHINGTON COUNTY, NOWATA COUNTY AND BARTLESVILLE Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission …is available on our website: www.csctulsa.org