Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScot Heath Modified over 9 years ago
1
DAIDS IPCP-HTM NIH/NIAID: 1 st IPCP on Rectal Microbicides Developments (2004-2011) Two Phase 1 Clinical Trials: RMP-01: Topical UC781 (single & 7-day topical) RMP-02 / MTN-006: Tenofovir (single oral, single & 7-day topical) Peter Anton, UCLA: PI Ian McGowan, MWRI/University of Pittsburgh: co-PI Ian McGowan, MWRI/University of Pittsburgh: PI NIH/NIAID: 2 nd IPCP on Rectal Microbicides Developments (2009-2014)
2
NIH IP/CP Outline Intent Assays for use in RM trials 1 st Phase 1 RM Clinical Trial utilizing assays: RMP-01 (UC781) 2 nd Phase 1 RM Clinical trial: RMP-02/MTN-006 (Tenofovir) context
3
Assay Optimization: selected for Phase 1 Assay factors addressed prior to trial (some still to address) : Apply to both vaginal and rectal samples Anticipate effect of standard clinical trial / home use such as enemas/douches/gels (osm; pH; dilution effect) Sequence of sample collection: inherent confounder Multi-site trials: determine where samples (Flow, explants etc) collected versus where/when processed (fresh, frozen, O/N, batched: 1 lab?) Semen/seminal fluid alter results/drug delivery? Same with sexual activity / trauma Relevance for interpreting “biopsy infection” experiments Compartment dilution effect on delivered drug concentrations? Quantify [microbicide] likely exposed to tissue. Challenge much greater in rectal than cervicovaginal explants NORMATIVE VALUES: to assess implications/actions of “out-of- range” values (and then: clinical relevance) NIH IP/CP
4
HPTN 056: Characterization of Baseline Mucosal Indices of Injury and Inflammation in Men for Use in Rectal Microbicide Trials Pre-Phase 1 rectal safety study: normative ranges; inherent variability Primary Objective Determine variability of mucosal immunological, virological and histopathological parameters in biopsies from 10cm & 30cm in the recto-sigmoid colon in 4 defined study groups (n=16): I.HIV-/RAI- II.HIV-/RAI+ III.HIV+/RAI+: high PVL IV.HIV+/RAI+: high PVL Secondary Objective Determine within group stability of defined measures over time (3 flexible sigs over 6 weeks) & biological variability between groups Assays Histopathology (qual/quant); flow cytometry, tissue cytokine mRNA, rectal secreted Ig, tissue VL) Total: 48 procedures; 1,440 biopsies McGowan et al, HPTN 056 JAIDS 2007
5
HPTN-056: Data Analysis Data analyzed by group means Subject variability around means explored Definitions: Sig: within subject standard deviation Tau: between subject standard deviation Intra-class correlation (ICC) [ICC = Tau^2/ (Tau^2 + Sig^2)] ICC thresholds –>0.75 shows strong stability –>0.5 shows moderate stability McGowan et al, HPTN 056 JAIDS 2007
6
Stability of Flow Cytometry Data MeanG1G2G3G4SigTauICC CD3%686674705.59.80.76 CD4%424112294.08.00.81 CD8%292862455.211.90.84 CD31%686673705.69.90.76 CD19%323026377.48.30.56 ICC: Intra-class correlation >.75 shows strong stability McGowan et al, HPTN 056 JAIDS 2007
7
Stability of Cytokine Data MeanG1G2G3G4SigTauICC RANTES (log 10 ) 4.14.54.94.10.280.490.75 IFN- (log 10 ) 2.73.23.33.00.290.500.74 IL-10 (log 10 ) 2.73.22.62.80.280.430.70 McGowan et al, HPTN 056 JAIDS 2007 ICC: Intra-class correlation >.75 shows strong stability
8
Colorectal (10cm) Colonic (30cm) Colorectal (higher than 10cm) Upper intestinal tract (systemic delivery to targets) Where to sample…”explants” When to sample…explants Real-life factors: bowel movements, prep, pre/post sexual prep, menses Drug trial factors: how long post exposure, frequency, # samples Safe to sample…? NIH IP/CP
9
X X Colorectal: Biopsy location NIH IP/CP
10
Colorectal Biopsy safety and location NIH IP/CP
11
Success Concentration Ano-Rectal Distance Anus Failure HIV RectumColon Microbicide RM Clinical Relevance: Selection Site for Explants Diagram courtesy: C Hendrix) ~10cm + effect? ~30cm no effect?
12
Rectal Explant Model used in RM Clinical Trials: “ex vivo biopsy infection” experiments Explant media soaked collagen rafts b)1 cm 2 raft placed atop the explant and inverted. HIV-1 infected and washed explants a) Explants transferred by transfer pipet to a dry petri-dish, cut-side down Mounted explants transferred to well of 24- well plate containing 500ul of explant medium Media 100% exchanged q 3 days for ~2 weeks (D1/D4/D7/D11/D14) Supernatant frozen for batched p- 24 ELISA (= qPCR of HIV RNA ) Fletcher et al AIDS 2006
13
A PHASE 1 SAFETY AND ACCEPTABILITY STUDY OF THE UC-781 MICROBICIDE GEL APPLIED RECTALLY IN HIV SERONEGATIVE ADULTS: RMP-01 P Anton, T Saunders, A Adler, C Siboliban, E Khanukhova, C Price, J Elliott, K Tanner, Ana Ventuneac, Alex Carballo-Dieguez, J Boscardin, Y Zhao, W Cumberland, AM Corner, C Mauck, I McGowan UCLA, NIH, CONRAD submitted
14
NIH IP/CP Rectal Biopsy Infections ex vivo: RMP-01 Samples acquired endoscopically (large-cup forceps): 14 biopsies at each site (10cm and 30cm) NO DRUG ADDED TO EXPLANTS (except at V2): all drug applied in vivo To laboratory and set up within 2 hours HIV (pre-determined strain, titers) applied to explants, incubated 2 hrs Biopsies washed (>3-5 times), then mounted on gelfoam, placed in well of 24-well plate; incubated for 12-14 days. Controls: media (uninfected control); UC781 at baseline visit only to demonstrate in vitro efficacy Supernatants for p24 taken every 3 days (100%); each time point is mean of 2 biopsies pooled; cumulative p24 graphed
15
HEC PlaceboUC781 0.10%UC781 0.25% 10cm 30cm NIH IP/CP (V2 = baseline) (V3 = single topical application UC781) Confidence from RMP-01 UC781 RM trial (n=36; 3 arms) in vivo exposed ex vivo infected Bx infection data (V2 vs V3) 10 4 virus titer
16
NIH IP/CP HEC PlaceboUC781 0.10%UC781 0.25% 10cm 30cm Baseline variability looks same…. but only 60% infected with this titer (V2 = baseline) (V3 = single topical application UC781) RMP-01 UC781 RM trial: now 10 2 virus titer
17
Lessons learned thus far for these types of trials: Do infectibility results from 30cm and 10cm differ: NO Need infectibility of ‘all’ baseline sample explants: YES Compare 10cm vs. 30cm for all subjects at baseline (V2) Paired t-test 10 2 viral dose0.8600 10 4 viral dose0.5228 No difference seen when using 36 subjects’ baseline data: “OK” to use 1 site in next trial Baseline infectibility NIH IP/CP Use higher titer virus for explant infection studies
18
DAIDS IPCP-HTM RMP-02/MTN-006: A Phase 1, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Rectally Applied 1%Vaginal Tenofovir Gel with Comparison to Oral Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate P Anton 1, R Cranston 3, A Carballo-Dieguez 4, A Kashuba 5, E Khanukhova 1, J Elliott 1, L Janocko 6,8, N Richardson-Harman 7, W Cumberland 9, C Mauck 10, C Hendrix 2,8, I McGowan 6,8 UCLA: Dept. of Medicine 1 & School of Public Health 9, Johns Hopkins University 2, University of Pittsburgh: Dept. of Medicine 3 & Magee-Womens Research Institute 6, Columbia University 4, UNC CFAR & School of Pharmacy 5, Alpha StatConsult LLC 7, MTN 8, CONRAD 10 Presented: CROI 2011, Boston, MA
19
Rectal intercourse is commonly practiced by men and women HIV transmission during receptive anal intercourse (RAI) is significantly greater per sexual act CAPRISA 004 demonstrated 39% reduction in HIV infection using 1% tenofovir gel formulated for vaginal use Given the prevalence of RAI and the success of this agent, this Phase 1 trial aimed to evaluate safety of the hyper- osmolar, vaginally formulated 1% tenofovir gel when used rectally; in addition, aims were to investigate acceptability, mucosal injury and multi-compartment PK Study Rationale
20
Baseline Evaluation Open label Oral tenofovir (N = 18) Single rectal tenofovir (N = 18) 2:1 7 Day Rectal tenofovir (N = 18) 2:1 Safety, PK / PD, acceptability RMP-02/MTN-006 Study Design 3 stage trial at 2 sites (UCLA/MWRI): open label TDF (oral) followed by 2:1 randomization of tenofovir: HEC placebo (for single rectal topical dose; 7-day rectal topical dosing) Each dosing stage with 2 weeks of sampling (then: 2 weeks wash-out/healing) Product: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300mg tablet, Tenofovir 1% gel (vaginal formulation/applicator) or HEC placebo gel 8.5 months; 3.5 months/participant all 18 enrolled → completed. 100% retention (78% male; 22% female) Each participant completed 12 visits with 8 flexible sigmoidoscopies in 3.5 months → ~2300 bx >10,000 study samples
21
Clinical Unit UCLA/MG Clin Lab (Safety labs, HIV, RPR HSV 1 & 2) Rectal Swabs Blood Rectal Sponges Stool Sample Biopsies UCLA/MG Plasma PBMC MTN PK Lab Magee NAAT GC, CT UCLA/MG Cytokines UCLA/MG Genova (calprotectin) Rectal Lavages UCLA/MG (Sloughing Assay) UCLA/MG UCAL/MG (Explant Culture, Immunophenotyping PK processing UCLA Research Pathology (Qualitative ) MTN Micro (rectal microflora) MTN PK Lab Vaginal Sponge UCLA/MG MTN PK Lab Magee-WRI (gram stain,pH) Urine Magee NAAT GC/CT MTN PK Lab UCLA/MG Beta HcG & U/A Subject’s Samples Workflow: ‘chain of custody’ DAIDS IPCP-HTM
22
Primary Objective: Safety of 1% vaginally-formulated tenofovir gel, applied rectally Endpoint: ≥ Grade 2 AE Secondary Objectives: Acceptability, Mucosal Immunotoxicity, PK Endpoints - Acceptability: - % of those at last visit liking product - likely to use the candidate in the future if helps Endpoints - Mucosal Injury: - fecal calprotectin - rectal microflora - secreted rectal cytokines - rectal epithelial sloughing - rectal histology - rectal mucosal CD4+ T cell phenotype/activation Endpoints - PK: Tenofovir/diphosphate concentrations (9-10 compartments): Blood: plasma, PBMC, PBMC subsets (CD4+/CD4-) Fluids: rectal fluid, vaginal fluid (sponges) Tissue: Whole biopsy homogenates, isolated mucosal mononuclear cells (MMC) & CD4+/CD- subsets Exploratory Objective: ex vivo infectibility of in vivo exposed rectal tissue biopsies Endpoint: cumulative HIV-1 p24 levels in colorectal explant supernatants at 14d Study Endpoints
23
All Adverse Events n GI System Events SubjectsEventsSubjectsEvents ORAL SD 181537715 RECTAL SD Placebo 651339 RECTAL SD Tenofovir 12817610 RECTAL 7-D Placebo 65926 RECTAL 7-D Tenofovir 12 471237 Safety p=0.10 p=0.002 p=0.001 p=0.002 RECTAL 7-D Tenofovir 122525 Clinical Grade 3 Events
24
Acceptability 75% likely to use TFV in the future if they felt it might be helpful, despite relatively more dislike and discomfort.
25
DAIDS IPCP-HTM Mucosal Injury Indices
26
With RECTAL dosing: plasma TFV Cmax & AUC: 2% of ORAL ‘7-day’ RECTAL dosing: no TFV accumulation in plasma PK: TFV Exposure in Plasma
27
7/1810/1212/12 PK: TFV-DP in Rectal Tissue (30 minutes post dose) Single ORAL: (i) TFV DP Tmax ≥ 24h post-dose. (ii) At 10 days, TFV DP detectable in 55% subjects Single RECTAL dose: (i) Tissue TFV DP Cmax was 112x > single ORAL and AUC all was 1.5x > single ORAL. (ii) At 10 days, TFV DP detectable in 80% ‘7-day’ RECTAL dosing: Tissue TFV DP accumulated: Cmax was 5x > single RECTAL dose
28
Biopsy Infection ex vivo of 7-day RECTAL dosing in vivo: Significant suppression seen ANCOVA p=0.005 (HIV-1 BaL TCID 50 =10 4 at ~10 cm) effect size: 0.80 Single ORAL dosing: no significant changes (p=0.65) Single RECTAL dosing: no significant changes (p=0.12)
29
Dose-Response Relationship: rectal tissue TFV DP with rectal biopsy infectibility Virus inhibition correlated with increasing tissue TFV-DP, even with small study n Feasible to assess both dose and response following in vivo exposure to drug
30
CONCLUSIONS The vaginal formulation of 1% TFV gel was sub-optimal for clinical safety and acceptability when rectally applied. Despite extensive mucosal indices of injury, none were seen with product use. Consistent with other studies, the systemic absorption of rectally-delivered TFV was ~2% of oral dose. Rectal dosing was associated with 100x more active TFV-DP in the target mucosa than oral dose. Rectal tissue biopsy infection ex vivo was significantly reduced compared to control; may be a potential biomarker of efficacy. PK/PD: Dose/response correlations were evaluable and significant in this intensive small trial.
31
Acknowledgments Support from MTN: funded by NIAID (5U01AI068633), NICHD, NIMH, all of NIH. U19 Integrated Preclinical-Clinical Program for HIV Topical Microbicides (IPCP-HTM) grant funded by DAIDS, NIAID, NIH grant (AI060614) DAIDS IPCP-HTM Participants Study Teams at each site: UCLA MWRI, University of Pittsburgh NIH/DAIDS MTN Network Support MTN Microbiology Laboratory MTN Clinical Pharmacology Analytical Lab at JHU CONRAD Gilead Alpha StatConsult LLC
32
DAIDS IPCP-HTM QUESTIONS ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.