1. RTI: Status Check Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org

2. Resources from this workshop series can be downloaded from:
RTI_academic.php

3. RTI & Academic Interventions: Shakedown Cruise
Definition: “a period of testing or a trial journey undergone by a ship, aircraft or other craft and its crew before being declared operational.”
Source: Shakedown cruise. Wikipedia. Retrieved from

4. RTI Institute Level 2 Team Trainings
October 9th, 9:00-3:00
December 2nd, 9:00-3:00
January 28th, 9:00-3:00
March 4th, 9:00-3:00
June 3rd, 9:00-3:00

5. What Works Clearinghouse Practice Guide: Study & Organizational Skills
Source: Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., and Metcalfe, J. (2007) Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER ). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from

6. RTI Institute: Level 2 Teams: Workshop Agenda
RTI: Overview
Foundation Element: Teacher Understanding & Support
Foundation Element: Assessment
Foundation Element: RTI Problem-Solving Teams
Foundation Element: Intervention Planning

7. RTI Assumption: Struggling Students Are ‘Typical’ Until Proven Otherwise…
RTI logic assumes that:
A student who begins to struggle in general education is typical, and that
It is general education’s responsibility to find the instructional strategies that will unlock the student’s learning potential
Only when the student shows through well-documented interventions that he or she has ‘failed to respond to intervention’ does RTI begin to investigate the possibility that the student may have a learning disability or other special education condition.

8. RTI ‘Pyramid of Interventions’
Tier 3: Intensive interventions. Students who are ‘non-responders’ to Tiers I & II may be eligible for special education services, intensive interventions.
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 2 Individualized interventions. Subset of students receive interventions targeting specific needs.
Tier 1: Universal interventions. Available to all students in a classroom or school. Can consist of whole-group or individual strategies or supports.

9. Complementary RTI Models: Standard Treatment & Problem-Solving Protocols
“The two most commonly used RTI approaches are (1) standard treatment and (2) problem-solving protocol. While these two approaches to RTI are sometimes described as being very different from each other, they actually have several common elements, and both fit within a problem-solving framework. In practice, many schools and districts combine or blend aspects of the two approaches to fit their needs.”
Source: Duffy, H. (August 2007). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school. Washington, DC: National High School Center. Retrieved from p. 5

10. RTI Interventions: Standard-Treatment vs. Problem-Solving
There are two different vehicles that schools can use to deliver RTI interventions:
Standard-Protocol (Standalone Intervention). Programs based on scientifically valid instructional practices (‘standard protocol’) are created to address frequent student referral concerns. These services are provided outside of the classroom. A middle school, for example, may set up a structured math-tutoring program staffed by adult volunteer tutors to provide assistance to students with limited math skills. Students referred for a Tier II math intervention would be placed in this tutoring program. An advantage of the standard-protocol approach is that it is efficient and consistent: large numbers of students can be put into these group interventions to receive a highly standardized intervention. However, standard group intervention protocols often cannot be individualized easily to accommodate a specific student’s unique needs.
Problem-solving (Classroom-Based Intervention). Individualized research-based interventions match the profile of a particular student’s strengths and limitations. The classroom teacher often has a large role in carrying out these interventions. A plus of the problem-solving approach is that the intervention can be customized to the student’s needs. However, developing intervention plans for individual students can be time-consuming.

11. Tier I Instruction/Interventions
Are universal—available to all students.
Can be delivered within classrooms or throughout the school.
Are likely to be put into place by the teacher at the first sign that a student is struggling.
All children have access to Tier 1 instruction/interventions. Teachers have the capability to use those strategies without requiring outside assistance.
Tier 1 instruction/interventions encompass:
The school’s core curriculum and all published or teacher-made materials used to deliver that curriculum.
Teacher use of ‘whole-group’ teaching & management strategies.
Teacher use of individualized strategies with specific students.
Tier I instruction/interventions attempt to answer the question: Are classroom instructional strategies & supports sufficient to help the student to achieve academic success?

12. Tier 1: Classroom-Level Interventions
Decision Point: Student is struggling and may face significant high-stakes negative outcome if situation does not improve.
Collaboration Opportunity: Teacher can refer the student to a grade-level, instruction team, or department meeting to brainstorm ideas – OR – teacher seeks out consultant in school to brainstorm intervention ideas.
Documentation: Teacher completes ‘Classroom Intervention Form’ prior to carrying out intervention. Teacher collects classroom data.
Decision Rule [Example]: Teacher should refer student to the next level of RTI support if the intervention is not successful within 8 instructional weeks.

14. Tier 2: Supplemental (Standard-Protocol Model) Interventions
Tier 2 interventions are typically delivered in small-group format. About 15% of students in the typical school will require Tier 2/supplemental intervention support.
Group size for Tier 2 interventions is limited to 4-6 students. Students placed in Tier 2 interventions should have a shared profile of intervention need.
The reading progress of students in Tier 2 interventions are monitored at least 1-2 times per month.
Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools. Routledge: New York.

15. Tier 2: Supplemental Interventions
Decision Point: Building-wide academic screenings
Collaboration Opportunity: After each building-wide academic screening, ‘data teams’ meet (teachers at a grade level; building principal; reading teacher, etc.) At the meeting, the group considers how the assessment data should shape/inform core instruction. Additionally, the data team sets a cutpoint to determine which students should be recruited for Tier 2 group interventions. NOTE: Team may continue to meet every 5 weeks to consider student progress in Tier 2; move students into and out of groups.
Documentation: Tier 2 instructor completes a Tier 2 Group Assignment Sheet listing students and their corresponding interventions. Progress-monitoring occurs 1-2 times per month.
Decision Rules [Example]: Student is returned to Tier 1 support if they perform above the 25th percentile in the next school-wide screening. Student is referred to Tier 3 (RTI Team) if they fail to make expected progress despite two Tier 2 (group-based) interventions.

17. Scheduling Elementary Tier 2 Interventions
Option 3: ‘Floating RTI’:Gradewide Shared Schedule. Each grade has a scheduled RTI time across classrooms. No two grades share the same RTI time. Advantages are that outside providers can move from grade to grade providing push-in or pull-out services and that students can be grouped by need across different teachers within the grade.
Anyplace Elementary School: RTI Daily Schedule
Grade K
Classroom 1
Classroom 2
Classroom 3
9:00-9:30
Grade 1
Classroom 1
Classroom 2
Classroom 3
9:45-10:15
Grade 2
Classroom 1
Classroom 2
Classroom 3
10:30-11:00
Grade 3
Classroom 1
Classroom 2
Classroom 3
12:30-1:00
Grade 4
Classroom 1
Classroom 2
Classroom 3
1:15-1:45
Grade 5
Classroom 1
Classroom 2
Classroom 3
2:00-2:30
Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices. New York: Routledge.

18. Tier 3: Intensive Individualized Interventions (Problem-Solving Model)
Tier 3 interventions are the most intensive offered in a school setting. About 5 % of a general-education student population may qualify for Tier 3 supports. Typically, the RTI Problem-Solving Team meets to develop intervention plans for Tier 3 students.
Students qualify for Tier 3 interventions because:
they are found to have a large skill gap when compared to their class or grade peers; and/or
They did not respond to interventions provided previously at Tiers 1 & 2.
Tier 3 interventions are provided daily for sessions of 30 minutes. The student-teacher ratio is flexible but should allow the student to receive intensive, individualized instruction. The academic or behavioral progress of students in Tier 3 interventions is monitored at least weekly.
Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools. Routledge: New York.

19. Tier 3: RTI Team Decision Point: RTI Problem-Solving Team
Collaboration Opportunity: Weekly RTI Problem-Solving Team meetings are scheduled to handle referrals of students that failed to respond to interventions from Tiers 1 & 2.
Documentation: Teacher referral form; RTI Team minutes form; progress-monitoring data collected at least weekly.
Decision Rules [Example]: If student has failed to respond adequately to 3 intervention trials of 6-8 weeks (from Tiers 2 and 3), the student may be referred to Special Education.

21. Advancing Through RTI: Flexibility in the Tiers
For purposes of efficiency, students should be placed in small-group instruction at Tier 2.
However, group interventions may not always be possible because –due to scheduling or other issues—no group is available. (For example, students with RTI behavioral referrals may not have a group intervention available.)
In such a case, the student will go directly to the problem-solving process (Tier 3)—typically through a referral to the school RTI Team.
Nonetheless, the school must still document the same minimum number of interventions attempted for every student in RTI, whether or not a student first received interventions in a group setting.

22. Avg Classroom Academic
Performance Level
Discrepancy 1: Skill Gap
(Current Performance Level)
Discrepancy 2:
Gap in Rate of Learning (‘Slope of Improvement’)
Target Student
‘Dual-Discrepancy’: RTI Model of Learning Disability (Fuchs 2003)

23. NYSED RTI Guidance Memo: April 2008

25. “The Regents policy framework for RtI: Defines RtI to minimally include: Appropriate instruction delivered to all students in the general education class by qualified personnel. Appropriate instruction in reading means scientific research-based reading programs that include explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, reading fluency (including oral reading skills) and reading comprehension strategies. Screenings applied to all students in the class to identify those students who are not making academic progress at expected rates.”

26. “Instruction matched to student need with increasingly intensive levels of targeted intervention and instruction for students who do not make satisfactory progress in their levels of performance and/or in their rate of learning to meet age or grade level standards. Repeated assessments of student achievement which should include curriculum based measures to determine if interventions are resulting in student progress toward age or grade level standards. The application of information about the student’s response to intervention to make educational decisions about changes in goals, instruction and/or services and the decision to make a referral for special education programs and/or services.”

27. “Written notification to the parents when the student requires an intervention beyond that provided to all students in the general education classroom that provides information about the: -amount and nature of student performance data that will be collected and the general education services that will be provided; -strategies for increasing the student’s rate of learning; and -parents’ right to request an evaluation for special education programs and/or services.”

28. “The Regents policy framework for RtI: Defines RtI to minimally include: Requires each school district to establish a plan and policies for implementing school-wide approaches and prereferral interventions in order to remediate a student’s performance prior to referral for special education, which may include the RtI process as part of a district’s school-wide approach. The school district must select and define the specific structure and components of its RtI program, including, but not limited to the: -criteria for determining the levels of intervention to be provided to students, -types of interventions, amount and nature of student performance data to be collected, and -manner and frequency for progress monitoring.”

29. RTI & Intervention: Key Concepts

30. Essential Elements of Any Academic or Behavioral Intervention (‘Treatment’) Strategy:
Method of delivery (‘Who or what delivers the treatment?’) Examples include teachers, paraprofessionals, parents, volunteers, computers.
Treatment component (‘What makes the intervention effective?’) Examples include activation of prior knowledge to help the student to make meaningful connections between ‘known’ and new material; guide practice (e.g., Paired Reading) to increase reading fluency; periodic review of material to aid student retention.

31. Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out
Core Instruction. Those instructional strategies that are used routinely with all students in a general-education setting are considered ‘core instruction’. High-quality instruction is essential and forms the foundation of RTI academic support. NOTE: While it is important to verify that good core instructional practices are in place for a struggling student, those routine practices do not ‘count’ as individual student interventions.

32. Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out
Intervention. An academic intervention is a strategy used to teach a new skill, build fluency in a skill, or encourage a child to apply an existing skill to new situations or settings. An intervention can be thought of as “a set of actions that, when taken, have demonstrated ability to change a fixed educational trajectory” (Methe & Riley-Tillman, 2008; p. 37).

33. Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out
Accommodation. An accommodation is intended to help the student to fully access and participate in the general-education curriculum without changing the instructional content and without reducing the student’s rate of learning (Skinner, Pappas & Davis, 2005). An accommodation is intended to remove barriers to learning while still expecting that students will master the same instructional content as their typical peers.
Accommodation example 1: Students are allowed to supplement silent reading of a novel by listening to the book on tape.
Accommodation example 2: For unmotivated students, the instructor breaks larger assignments into smaller ‘chunks’ and providing students with performance feedback and praise for each completed ‘chunk’ of assigned work (Skinner, Pappas & Davis, 2005).

34. Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out
Modification. A modification changes the expectations of what a student is expected to know or do—typically by lowering the academic standards against which the student is to be evaluated. Examples of modifications:
Giving a student five math computation problems for practice instead of the 20 problems assigned to the rest of the class
Letting the student consult course notes during a test when peers are not permitted to do so
Allowing a student to select a much easier book for a book report than would be allowed to his or her classmates.

35. RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem-Solving Model Jim Wright www
RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem-Solving Model Jim Wright

36. RTI ‘Pyramid of Interventions’
Tier 3: Intensive interventions. Students who are ‘non-responders’ to Tiers I & II may be eligible for special education services, intensive interventions.
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 2: Individualized interventions. Subset of students receive interventions targeting specific needs.
Tier 1: Universal interventions. Available to all students in a classroom or school. Can consist of whole-group or individual strategies or supports.

37. Tier 3 Targets: Intervention, Curriculum, and Environment
“For [a tier 3] intervention to be effective and robust, it must focus on the specific needs of the student. It should also address the reason that the student is experiencing difficulty…. Rather than considering a [student] problem to be the result of inalterable student characteristics, teams are compelled to focus on change that can be made to the intervention, curriculum or environment that would result in positive student outcome. The hypothesis and intervention should focus on those variables that are alterable within the school setting. These alterable variables include learning goals and objectives (what is to be learned), materials, time, student-to-teacher ratio, activities, and motivational strategies.” p. 95
Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools. Routledge: New York.

38. Tier 3 Interventions Are Developed With Assistance from the School’s RTI (Problem-Solving) Team
Effective RTI Teams:
Are multi-disciplinary and include classroom teachers among their members
Follow a structured ‘problem-solving’ model
Use data to analyze the academic problem and match the student to effective, evidence-based interventions
Develop a detailed research-based intervention plan to help staff with implementation
Check up on the teacher’s success in carrying out the intervention (‘intervention integrity’)

39. The Problem-Solving Model & Multi-Disciplinary Teams
A school consultative process (‘the problem-solving model’) with roots in applied behavior analysis was developed (e.g., Bergan, 1995) that includes 4 steps:
Problem Identification
Problem Analysis
Plan Implementation
Problem Evaluation
Originally designed for individual consultation with teachers, the problem-solving model was later adapted in various forms to multi-disciplinary team settings.
Source: Bergan, J. R. (1995). Evolution of a problem-solving model of consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 6(2),

40. Team Roles
Coordinator
Facilitator
Recorder
Time Keeper
Case Manager

41. RTI Team Consultative Process
Step 1: Assess Teacher Concerns 5 Mins
Step 2: Inventory Student Strengths/Talents 5 Mins
Step 3: Review Background/Baseline Data 5 Mins
Step 4: Select Target Teacher Concerns 5-10 Mins
Step 5: Set Academic and/or Behavioral Outcome Goals and Methods for Progress-Monitoring 5 Mins
Step 6: Design an Intervention Plan Mins
Step 7: Plan How to Share Meeting Information with the Student’s Parent(s) 5 Mins
Step 8: Review Intervention & Monitoring Plans 5 Mins

42. RTI Team Effectiveness Self-Rating Scale

43. RTI Problem-Solving Teams: Top 5 ‘To Do’ List
Ensure that the RTI Team follows a structured problem-solving process that reliably matches student concern(s) to interventions.
Develop guidelines for teachers to let them know when a referral to the RTI Team is recommended.
Develop procedures to accept student referrals from multiple sources (e.g., teachers, parents, administrators, support staff).
Implement a ‘pre-meeting’ prior to the initial RTI Team meeting to clarify teacher concerns and decide on what data to collect.
Inventory your school resources that can be used to create RTI Team-level interventions (e.g., expert consultation services; staff available to implement interventions, commercial instruction/intervention resources, etc.).

44. RTI: Status Check Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org

45. RTI Problem-Solving Teams: Top 5 ‘To Do’ List
Ensure that the RTI Team follows a structured problem-solving process that reliably matches student concern(s) to interventions.
Develop guidelines for teachers to let them know when a referral to the RTI Team is recommended.
Develop procedures to accept student referrals from multiple sources (e.g., teachers, parents, administrators, support staff).
Implement a ‘pre-meeting’ prior to the initial RTI Team meeting to clarify teacher concerns and decide on what data to collect.
Inventory your school resources that can be used to create RTI Team-level interventions (e.g., expert consultation services; staff available to implement interventions, commercial instruction/intervention resources, etc.).

46. Academic Interventions: Top 5 ‘To Do’ List
Identify your school’s or district’s guidelines for what makes an intervention ‘evidence-based’.
Train school staff to distinguish between core instruction, intervention, accommodations, and modifications.
Develop teacher capacity to implement appropriate and effective classroom (Tier 1) interventions.
Create collections of intervention ideas for common referral concerns in your school: ‘intervention menu’.
Develop methods to track ‘intervention follow-through’ (intervention integrity).

47. Assessment & Progress-Monitoring: Top 5 ‘To Do’ List
Define key literacy skills to be assessed at each grade level: select an array of appropriate literacy measures.
Create a plan to conduct literacy-skills screening on all students three times per year (K-8) or to screen using archival data (9-12).
Hold ‘data meetings’ (K-8) with grade-level teachers or instructional teams soon after each schoolwide literacy screening to consider changes to core instruction, select students for Tier 2 interventions.
Develop the capacity as needed to conduct more detailed diagnostic academic assessments of students picked up in schoolwide screenings.
Ensure that your school has the capacity to monitor students on Tier 2 interventions 1-2 times per month; Tier 3 at least weekly.

48. Building Teacher Support for RTI: Top 5 ‘To Do’ List
Create a year-long RTI information sharing plan that outlines what information should be shared with faculty and in what settings. (Enlist teachers regularly to share their RTI student successes and information about new assessment and intervention methods.)
Solicit teacher concerns about struggling students and present RTI as a coordinated, schoolwide approach to address those concerns.
Inventory all school and district academic and behavioral programs and initiatives. Tie each program or initiative to the 3-Tier RTI model.
Validate teachers’ ‘best current practices’ by showing that the good instructional and behavioral strategies that many of them are already using in their classrooms are considered essential elements of Tier 1 RTI.
Provide teachers with specific details about the time and resources required to do Tier 1 intervention and assessment, so that they can envision integrating those practices into their instructional day.