Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMartina Hampton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR) Indianapolis Healthy Start Amanda Raftery, MPH Julie Sautter, MSW
2
Indianapolis Healthy Start Goal: To reduce infant mortality rates and improve perinatal outcomes by eliminating disparities in perinatal health systems. Target Population: Underserved and disadvantaged pregnant women in Marion County including minorities (African American, Hispanic and Appalachian), or those at risk by demographic factors (teenagers), or those at the highest risk of poor birth outcomes. Core Services : Outreach, Health Education, Case Management (Prenatal Care, Interconceptional Care, Depression Screening & Referral)
3
PPOR Team Members Originally started with only three members; currently 13 members: Marion County Health Department – 7 members Population Health Bureau Director, Maternal & Child Health Director, Healthy Start, FIMR, and Epidemiology Indiana State Department of Health – 2 members MCH Nurse Consultant, Epidemiology Indiana Perinatal Network – 2 members Indiana Access, SIDS Alliance Wishard Health Services – 1 member Indiana University Child Protection Team Child Fatality Review Team Healthy Families – 1 member
4
PPOR Team Activities Attended three PPOR “How to Do” Workshops Phoenix, AZ – December 2003 Washington, DC – March 2004 Portland, OR – September 2004 Participate in monthly PPOR seminar calls Presented to Indianapolis Healthy Babies Consortium – July 2004 Presented preliminary PPOR data Recruited team members Collected community surveys and community readiness tents Held three team meetings Meet bi-monthly – November, February and April Review data until July 2005 Develop logic model and interventions by December 2005
5
Indianapolis PPOR Map PPOR Excess Deaths * Compared to Internal and External Reference Groups** 1999-2003 Birth Cohort Data*** Marion County, IN *Excluded are infants who weighed <500 grams at birth and fetal deaths that occurred before the 24 th week or were <500 grams. **Internal Reference Group: White, non-Hispanic women, age >=20 yrs., married, non-smoking, who have an education >=13 years, received prenatal care in the 1 st trimester and reside in Marion County, IN. External Reference Group: White non-Hispanic women, age >=20 yrs., who have an education >=13 years. ***Data compiled from birth certificate data from the Marion County Health Department, Indianapolis, IN
6
Kitagawa, Risk Factor, and Cause of Death Analyses Results Highlights Kitagawa Analysis Black women and women 20-34 years have 40% of their excess mortality rate occurring from excess birth weight specific mortality. Risk Factors for VLBW and Survivability of VLBW infants Risk Factors: One of the most notable findings was that Black women and women 20-34 were more likely than the reference group to have had prenatal care in the Kotelchuck Index category of “Intermediate”. Cause of Death Analysis for Infant Health Category The injury category had highest percentage of deaths. A large percentage were due to suffocation and strangulation.
7
Additional Data Analyses Generated profiles of women most likely to experience a VLBW birth Black women, being single, <12 years education, <24 years of age and smoking during pregnancy The impact of being single was relatively small among blacks and women with few prior births Examined preterm status with regards to VLBW and SGA infants Black women and women <20 years of age were most likely to have preterm births that were VLBW or SGA
8
Future Data Analysis Investigate factors surrounding deaths due to suffocation and strangulation. Summary of SIDS by age at death (in months) Summary of causes of death for higher weight fetal deaths and where death occurred (i.e. hospital or after discharge) Summary of VLBW broken down by weight distribution Investigate factors surrounding C-sections for high risk groups Map VLBW births vs. VLBW births resulting in death. Identify zip codes at high risk for VLBW births
9
Community Partner Indiana Access Larry Humbert Program Director
10
Indiana Access Principles Modeled after the Disney Institute of Customer Service Community based – action research Asset based Consumer focused customer service Changing the culture in which maternal and child health services are delivered Data Collection Efforts Hypothesis – “How people are treated may play a role in whether they access and remain in care” Four pilot community health centers 525 Interviews with postpartum women 550 Interviews with parents of children 6 mos. – 5 yrs. 95 surveys of prenatal and pediatric providers and support staff Focus groups of current and recently pregnant women
11
Findings Intent of Pregnancy 18% wanted to be pregnant now 45% wanted to be pregnant later 26% never wanted to be pregnant Not Using Family Planning 68% of unintended pregnancies were not using a family planning method
12
Reasons for Not Using Family Planning 27% Wanted to be pregnant 14% Did not think I could get pregnant 12% Did not want to use birth control 11% Don’t know / not sure 10% I had side effects 4% Didn’t think I was going to have sex 3% Husband / partner did not want
13
Early Prenatal Care 24% Did Not Receive Early Prenatal Care Reasons: 31% Did not know I was pregnant 20% Could not get an earlier appointment 12% Did not have enough $ / insurance 12% I had too many other things going on 3% No one to care for other children 5% Did not want to know I was pregnant
14
Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (FIMR ) Teri Conard FIMR Coordinator
15
FIMR Mission and Purpose Mission Statement: To tell the stories of the mothers whose infants represent the fetal infant mortality rates in Marion County, by “painting the the faces behind the numbers” through studying fetal infant death information, listening to the mothers and protecting their privacy, with the goal of improving maternal child services and infant mortality through community partnerships. Purpose: To enhance the health and well-being of women, infants, and families by improving the community resources and service delivery systems available to them
16
IHB-FIMR Activities Case Review Activities 39 Cases Abstracted 6 FIMR Maternal Interviews 6 Case Review Team Meetings Community Action Team (CAT) Indianapolis Healthy Babies Consortium PPOR Team Marion County Healthcare System Representation Development still a Work in Progress
17
PPOR Next Steps Continue analyzing data Development of community action teams/projects Begin and develop logic model and interventions Tentative joint technical assistance visit with CityMatCH, Friendly Access, and HRSA
18
Contact Information Indianapolis Healthy Start/PPOR Julie Sautter jsautter@hhcorp.orgjsautter@hhcorp.org 317-221-2455 Amanda Raftery araftery@hhcorp.orgaraftery@hhcorp.org 317-221-3120 Fetal Infant Mortality Review Teri Conard tconard@hhcorp.orgtconard@hhcorp.org 317-221-3103 Indiana Access Larry Humbert lhumbert@indianaperinatal.orglhumbert@indianaperinatal.org 317-924-0825
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.