1. Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003

2. Results to be Covered What are the main constituents of PM2.5? Are these regionally or locally generated? What are the largest emission source types and where are they located? How consistent are the results based on ambient air analyses with those from modeling?

3. What are the main constituents of PM2.5 in Urban Areas? (1) Sulfate and Total Carbon dominate the eastern pies (2) Total Carbon dominant in the western pies, nitrate large fraction in southern CA and SLC.

4. What are the main constituents of PM2.5 in Rural Areas? (1) Sulfate and Total Carbon dominate the eastern pies. (2) West dominated by Total Carbon, crustal important in southwest and eastern WA.

5. Comparison of Urban and Rural Composition Urban Rural Comparison of annual average (March 2001 - Feb 2002) PM 2.5 mass and species concentrations. Urban data from EPA’s speciation network and rural data from IMPROVE network.

6. Regional vs. Urban Pollutants PM2.5 Mass Sulfate Total Carbon Nitrate Ammonium Concentration (  g/m 3 ) Comparison of annual average (March 2001 - Feb 2002) PM 2.5 mass and species concentrations at paired urban and rural locations. Urban data from EPA’s speciation network and rural data from IMPROVE network. Average urban concentration is sum of estimated urban and regional contributions. 8

7. Regional vs. Urban Pollutants Sulfate is mostly a regional problem...the urban excess is small. Total Carbon appears to be both a regional and an urban problem, due to various sources of carbon. Total carbon has three components: + Black Carbon (BC) – directly emitted, likely mostly urban + Primary Organic Aerosols (POA) – directly emitted, likely mostly urban + Secondary Organic Aerosols (SOA) from anthropogenic sources and from biogenic sources (coniferous trees) – likely both urban and regional problem. Nitrate may be both an urban and a regional problem…note that urban excess tends to be higher in the North compared to the South due to climate. Ammonium associates with Sulfate and Nitrate. Can be a regional and urban problem depending on the source of ammonia. Crustal material (not shown) may be both an urban and a regional problem; very small amounts (<1 µg/m 3 ) appear in both urban and rural areas, but may be generated from different sources. Regional pollutants are typically observed at similar concentration levels across broad geographic areas. Urban pollutants are typically highest in and near urban areas. PM2.5 Mass Sulfate Total Carbon Nitrate Ammonium Concentration (  g/m 3 ) Comparison of annual average (March 2001 - Feb 2002) PM 2.5 mass and species concentrations at paired urban and rural locations. Urban data from EPA’s speciation network and rural data from IMPROVE network. Average urban concentration is sum of estimated urban and regional contributions. 8

8. Regional vs. Urban Pollutants Sulfate is mostly a regional problem...the urban excess is small. Total Carbon appears to be both a regional and an urban problem, due to various sources of carbon. Total carbon has three components: + Black Carbon (BC) – directly emitted, likely mostly urban + Primary Organic Aerosols (POA) – directly emitted, likely mostly urban + Secondary Organic Aerosols (SOA) from anthropogenic sources and from biogenic sources (coniferous trees) – likely both urban and regional problem. Nitrate may be both an urban and a regional problem…note that urban excess tends to be higher in the North compared to the South due to climate. Ammonium associates with Sulfate and Nitrate. Can be a regional and urban problem depending on the source of ammonia. Crustal material (not shown) may be both an urban and a regional problem; very small amounts (<1 µg/m 3 ) appear in both urban and rural areas, but may be generated from different sources. 8

9. What are the largest emission source types? (Based on Source Apportionment Analyses) (1)Sulfate source type is largest at all sites. Mobile and nitrate source types are second and third largest at all sites. (2)Based on EPA-sponsored SA study in 8 urban areas. (3)EPA-sponsored 8-cities work consistent with results from recent compilation of > 17 published SA works.

10. Bronx BirminghamCharlotteHouston Indianapolis Milwaukee St. Louis DC Regions for Largest Emission Source Type: (1) Features Unique to Each City, (2) But They Intersect

11. Charlotte “Sulfate” Source Regions Common to Multiple Sites 3+5+ Milwaukee St. Louis Indianapolis Birmingham DC Bronx Houston 1999 SO2 Emissions (Tons/Year) Where is the Largest Emission Source Type Located? (Based on Multiple Cities)

12. Charlotte “Sulfate” Source Regions Common to Multiple Sites 3+5+ Milwaukee St. Louis Indianapolis Birmingham DC Bronx Houston 1999 SO2 Emissions (Tons/Year) Locations of SO2 emissions are consistent with high- probability regions for “Sulfate” source type.

13. Average Mass Contributions for Main Profiles (ug/m3) EPA 8-Cities Source Apportionment Study : Source Types and How Much They Contribute

14. Preliminary Consistency Check with Modeling Results Comparison of Bronx Source Region for Sulfate and Zero Out Runs States with largest impact on Bronx all in High Probability Source Region. States with small impact on Bronx not in High Probability Source Region ug/m3 sulfate

15. Source Apportionment Compilation Review of Nearly 20 Recently Published Articles Using Source Apportionment Modeling Over 35 Eastern Locations Common Themes –Secondary Sulfate/Coal Combustion One of the Largest Sources in Almost All Studies –Secondary Sulfate/Coal Combustion Over 50% of the Mass During Some Seasons (mostly summer) in Many Studies –Secondary Organic Mass/Motor Vehicles Identified in Most Studies –Nitrate Dominated Source Identified in About Half of the Studies (In studies where back trajectories were used, origin of source often pointed to areas associated with high ammonia emissions)

16. Locations Included in Compilation PLUS: Seattle SLC Valley Phoenix

17. Recap Major species in east are sulfate, OC, and nitrate; in the west, OC and nitrate. Urban/rural comparison indicates that attainment in the East is not achievable just with local control measures. Main sources are combustion from utilities and mobile. Preliminary assessment shows consistent result from observed and predictive analyses.

18. Tabular Listing of Locations LabelLocation or Nearest CityLabelLocation or Nearest City 1Acadia National Park, ME18Bondville, IL 2Lye Brook Wilderness, VT19St. Louis, MO 3Underhill, VT20Boundary Waters Canoe Area, MN 4Bronx, NY21Atlanta, GA 5Connecticut Hill, NY22Yorkville, GA 6Brigantine National Wildlife Refuge, NJ23Pensacola, FL 7Arendtsville, PA24NW of Pensacola, FL 8M.K. Goddard, PA25Birmingham, AL 9Washington, DC26Centreville, AL 10Jefferson/James River Face Wilderness, VI27Gulfport, MS 11Shenandoah National Park, VI28Oak Grove, MS 12Dolly Sods/Otter Creek Wilderness, WV29Houston, TX 13Toronto, ON30Charlotte, NC 14Quaker City, OH31Fort Meade, MD 15Livonia, IN32Indianapolis, IN 16Mammoth Cave National Park, KY33Milwaukee, WI 17Great Smoky Mountains National Park, TN34Narragansett, RI