Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJasmin Arnold Modified over 9 years ago
1
746 Human Brain Pain
2
Pain : Aim nperception nperipheral responses u role of NSAIDs e.g. aspirin nspinal modulation u gate control u peptidergic modulation nCNS
3
Perception npain u human description u International Association for the Study of Pain: " Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage ". nphantom pain u amputees nWhy do we need pain?
4
Nocioception nnoxious stimuli u animal models ? nassociated with parts of CNS
5
Peripheral responses nSpecialised receptors nPain is not just neurons firing more often nAdequate stimuli nRole of u aspirin u Paracetamol u Ibuprofen
6
Pain is… nnot just neurons firing more often
7
Specialised receptors nHeinbecker 1933 A- u faster than 2.5m/s u high threshold mechanoreceptors - 20 cm -2 u sharp pain nC u slower than 1m/s u polymodal F heat - pressure - noxious chemicals
8
Pain is… nouch nache
9
Adequate stimuli ntemperature nC fibers sensitive to very low concentrations of u histamine 10 -8 M, ACh 10 -8 M u Prostaglandins 10 -10 M u no one chemical ?? nreleased by tissue damage
10
Capsaicin ntransient effect of chillies - capsaicin nLoss of nocioceptive response in new born rats with capsaicin
11
Capsaicin nActive ingredient of chillies nActivates TRPV1 channels
12
Role of aspirin naspirin blocks Cyclooxygenase u = COX u = PGH synthase ncovalent modification to ser - 530 u http://cti.itc.virginia.edu/~cmg/Demo/pdb/cycox/cy cox.html arachidonic acid COX prostaglandin PGG2 COX prostaglandin PGH2
13
Other NSAIDs n n on- s teroidal a nti- i nflammatory d rugs nIbuprofen u COX competitive inhibitor nParacetamol u = Acetaminophen u = N-acetyl-para-aminophenol u COX-3 inhibitor
14
Summary so far nPain perceived A - and C fibres nresponse to pain blocked by NSAIDs u prostaglandin synthesis nNext: Spinal cord...
15
Spinal Cord DRG ventral root dorsal root dorsal horn
16
Gate control hypothesis nMelzack & Wall (1965) nin the spinal cord the pain pathway is modulated
17
Gate control hypothesis
18
Neuromatrix nMelzack & Wall revised their theory to elaborate on the spinal cord system as neuromatrix
19
Evidence ? nanatomical npharmacological nphysiological nanecdotal
20
SG substantia gelatinosa nlayered nmap of skin
21
Anatomy - cont
22
Enkaphalins in SG ndrawing of nocioceptive cell in SG nenkephalin immunoreactive nenkephalin receptors mu delta kappa
23
endogenous opioids nTyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Met nTyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Leu
24
Morphine nderived from opium naction as analgesic in spinal cord nusually codeine OCh 3
25
Substance P n11 amino acid peptide nArg Pro Lys Pro Gln Gln Phe Phe Gly Leu Met nFound in CNS and dorsal horn of spinal cord nExample of a tachykinin
26
SP as a transmitter nmain excitatory transmitter is glutamate ncapsaicin blocks C fibers selectively
27
tactile stimuli nMummy rub it better ? u lateral inhibition ? nTENS
28
Modulation in SG
29
Summary so far: nspinal modulation ngate control or neuromatrix ntactile stimuli nTENS nSG nSP nopioids nnext: CNS
30
Gate & CNS nnoradrenaline nserotonin nenkephalin nstress
31
CNS nCNS itself not sensitive to pain u meninges are - local anaesthetic nregional specialisation nleucotomy u removal of frontal lobes / thalamus to remove pain perception PET scan shows blood flow
32
Summary npain as human response nperipheral control by NSAIDs nspinal control - peptide neurotransmitters ncontrol by brain
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.