Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Phylogeny and Systematics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Phylogeny and Systematics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Phylogeny and Systematics
Chapter 25 Phylogeny and Systematics

2 Overview: Investigating the Tree of Life
This chapter describes how biologists trace phylogeny The evolutionary history of a species or group of related species

3 Biologists draw on the fossil record
Which provides information about ancient organisms Figure 25.1

4 Biologists also use systematics
As an analytical approach to understanding the diversity and relationships of organisms, both present-day and extinct

5 Currently, systematists use
Morphological, biochemical, and molecular comparisons to infer evolutionary relationships Figure 25.2

6 Concept 25.1: Phylogenies are based on common ancestries inferred from fossil, morphological, and molecular evidence

7 The Fossil Record Sedimentary rocks Are the richest source of fossils
Are deposited into layers called strata 1 Rivers carry sediment to the ocean. Sedimentary rock layers containing fossils form on the ocean floor. 2 Over time, new strata are deposited, containing fossils from each time period. 3 As sea levels change and the seafloor is pushed upward, sedimentary rocks are exposed. Erosion reveals strata and fossils. Younger stratum with more recent fossils Older stratum with older fossils Figure 25.3

8 Though sedimentary fossils are the most common
Paleontologists study a wide variety of fossils Figure 25.4a–g (a) Dinosaur bones being excavated from sandstone (g) Tusks of a 23,000-year-old mammoth, frozen whole in Siberian ice (e) Boy standing in a 150-million-year-old dinosaur track in Colorado (d) Casts of ammonites, about 375 million years old (f) Insects preserved whole in amber (b) Petrified tree in Arizona, about 190 million years old (c) Leaf fossil, about 40 million years old

9 Index fossils Are similar fossils found in the same strata in different locations Allow strata at one location to be correlated with strata at another location Figure 26.6

10 Accumulating “daughter” isotope
The absolute ages of fossils Can be determined by radiometric dating 1 2 3 4 Accumulating “daughter” isotope Ratio of parent isotope to daughter isotope Remaining “parent” isotope Time (half-lives) 8 16 Figure 26.7

11 The analogy of a clock Can be used to place major events in the Earth’s history in the context of the geological record Figure 26.10 Land plants Animals Multicellular eukaryotes Single-celled Atmospheric oxygen Prokaryotes Origin of solar system and Earth Humans Ceno- zoic Meso- zoic Paleozoic Archaean Eon Billions of years ago Proterozoic 1 2 3 4

12 The fossil record Fossils reveal
Is based on the sequence in which fossils have accumulated in such strata Fossils reveal Ancestral characteristics that may have been lost over time

13 Magnetic reversals of the north and south magnetic poles
The magnetism of rocks Can also provide dating information Magnetic reversals of the north and south magnetic poles Have occurred repeatedly in the past Leave their record on rocks throughout the world

14 The fossil record chronicles a number of occasions
Mass Extinctions The fossil record chronicles a number of occasions When global environmental changes were so rapid and disruptive that a majority of species were swept away Millions of years ago 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 2,500 Number of taxonomic families 80 Permian mass extinction 2,000 Extinction rate 60 1,500 Extinction rate ( ) Number of families ( ) 40 1,000 Cretaceous mass extinction 20 500 Carboniferous Proterozoic eon Cambrian Ordovician Devonian Permian Cretaceous Silurian Paleogene Neogene Triassic Jurassic Figure 26.8 Paleozoic Mesozoic Ceno- zoic

15 Morphological and Molecular Homologies
In addition to fossil organisms Phylogenetic history can be inferred from certain morphological and molecular similarities among living organisms In general, organisms that share very similar morphologies or similar DNA sequences Are likely to be more closely related than organisms with vastly different structures or sequences

16 Sorting Homology from Analogy
A potential misconception in constructing a phylogeny Is similarity due to convergent evolution, called analogy, rather than shared ancestry

17 Geological events that alter environments
Change the course of biological evolution Conversely, life changes the planet that it inhabits Figure 26.1

18 The Cretaceous extinction
Doomed many marine and terrestrial organisms, most notably the dinosaurs Is thought to have been caused by the impact of a large meteor NORTH AMERICA Chicxulub crater Yucatán Peninsula Figure 26.9

19 Much remains to be learned about the causes of mass extinctions
But it is clear that they provided life with unparalleled opportunities for adaptive radiations into newly vacated ecological niches

20 Earth’s continents are not fixed
Continental Drift Earth’s continents are not fixed They drift across our planet’s surface on great plates of crust that float on the hot underlying mantle

21 Often, these plates slide along the boundary of other plates
Pulling apart or pushing against each other Figure 26.18 North American Plate Caribbean Juan de Fuca Cocos Plate Pacific Nazca South African Scotia Plate Antarctic Arabian Eurasian Plate Philippine Indian Australian

22 Many important geological processes
Occur at plate boundaries or at weak points in the plates themselves Volcanoes and volcanic islands Trench Oceanic ridge Oceanic crust Seafloor spreading Subduction zone Figure 26.19

23 The formation of the supercontinent Pangaea during the late Paleozoic era
And its breakup during the Mesozoic era explain many biogeographic puzzles Figure 26.20 India collided with Eurasia just 10 million years ago, forming the Himalayas, the tallest and youngest of Earth’s major mountain ranges. The continents continue to drift. By the end of the Mesozoic, Laurasia and Gondwana separated into the present-day continents. By the mid-Mesozoic, Pangaea split into northern (Laurasia) and southern (Gondwana) landmasses. Cenozoic North America Eurasia Africa South America India Madagascar Antarctica Australia Laurasia Mesozoic Gondwana At the end of the Paleozoic, all of Earth’s landmasses were joined in the supercontinent Pangaea. Pangaea Paleozoic 251 135 65.5 Millions of years ago

24 C. Fossil record is substantial, but incomplete
Ancestral characteristics may have been lost over time D. Phylogeny has a biogeographic basis in continental drift: similar species should be found in close proximity, but our continents are moving. E. History of life is punctuated by mass extinctions: catastrophic

25 The Permian extinction
#6Two major mass extinctions, the Permian and the Cretaceous: thus marking separtion in major eras of geologic time. Have received the most attention The Permian extinction Claimed about 96% of marine animal species and 8 out of 27 orders of insects Is thought to have been caused by enormous volcanic eruptions

26 Convergent evolution occurs when similar environmental pressures and natural selection
Produce similar (analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages Figure 25.5

27 Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently
Are also called homoplasies

28 Evaluating Molecular Homologies
Systematists use computer programs and mathematical tools When analyzing comparable DNA segments from different organisms Figure 25.6 C C A T C A G A G T C C C C A T C A G A G T C C C C A T C A G A G T C C G T A Deletion Insertion C C A T C A A G T C C C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C C C A T C A A G T C C C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C 1 Ancestral homologous DNA segments are identical as species 1 and species 2 begin to diverge from their common ancestor. 2 Deletion and insertion mutations shift what had been matching sequences in the two species. 3 Homologous regions (yellow) do not all align because of these mutations. 4 Homologous regions realign after a computer program adds gaps in sequence 1. 1 2 A C G G A T A G T C C A C T A G G C A C T A T C A C C G A C A G G T C T T T G A C T A G Figure 25.7

29 Concept 25.2: Phylogenetic systematics connects classification with evolutionary history
Taxonomy Is the ordered division of organisms into categories based on a set of characteristics used to assess similarities and differences

30 Binomial Nomenclature
8.a. Is the two-part format of the scientific name of an organism Was developed by Carolus Linnaeus 8.b. Organized into a hierarchical classification: broader and broader groups

31 The binomial name of an organism or scientific epithet
Is latinized Is the genus and species

32 Hierarchical Classification
Linnaeus also introduced a system For grouping species in increasingly broad categories Panthera pardus Felidae Carnivora Mammalia Chordata Animalia Eukarya Domain Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Figure 25.8

33 #9 Modern technique for grouping
Concept 25.4: Much of an organism’s evolutionary history is documented in its genome Comparing nucleic acids or other molecules to infer relatedness Is a valuable tool for tracing organisms’ evolutionary history

34 Linking Classification and Phylogeny
Systematists depict evolutionary relationships In branching phylogenetic trees Panthera pardus (leopard) Mephitis mephitis (striped skunk) Lutra lutra (European otter) Canis familiaris (domestic dog) Canis lupus (wolf) Panthera Mephitis Lutra Canis Felidae Mustelidae Canidae Carnivora Order Family Genus Species Figure 25.9

35 Each branch point Represents the divergence of two species Leopard
Domestic cat Common ancestor

36 “Deeper” branch points
Represent progressively greater amounts of divergence Leopard Domestic cat Common ancestor Wolf

37 A clade within a cladogram
Concept 25.3: Phylogenetic systematics informs the construction of phylogenetic trees based on shared characteristics A cladogram Is a depiction of patterns of shared characteristics among taxa A clade within a cladogram Is defined as a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants Cladistics Is the study of resemblances among clades

38 Cladistics Clades Can be nested within larger clades, but not all groupings or organisms qualify as clades

39 A valid clade is monophyletic
Signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants (a) Monophyletic. In this tree, grouping 1, consisting of the seven species B–H, is a monophyletic group, or clade. A mono- phyletic group is made up of an ancestral species (species B in this case) and all of its descendant species. Only monophyletic groups qualify as legitimate taxa derived from cladistics. Grouping 1 D C E G F B A J I K H Figure 25.10a

40 A paraphyletic clade Is a grouping that consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants (b) Paraphyletic. Grouping 2 does not meet the cladistic criterion: It is paraphyletic, which means that it consists of an ancestor (A in this case) and some, but not all, of that ancestor’s descendants. (Grouping 2 includes the descendants I, J, and K, but excludes B–H, which also descended from A.) D C E B G H F J I K A Grouping 2 Figure 25.10b

41 A polyphyletic grouping
Includes numerous types of organisms that lack a common ancestor Grouping 3 (c) Polyphyletic. Grouping 3 also fails the cladistic test. It is polyphyletic, which means that it lacks the common ancestor of (A) the species in the group. Further- more, a valid taxon that includes the extant species G, H, J, and K would necessarily also contain D and E, which are also descended from A. D C B E G F H A J I K Figure 25.10c

42 Phylogenetic Trees and Timing
Any chronology represented by the branching pattern of a phylogenetic tree Is relative rather than absolute in terms of representing the timing of divergences 10. Therefore, a phylogenetic tree shows evolutionary relationships.

43

44 Shared Primitive and Shared Derived Characteristics
In cladistic analysis #12.Clades are defined by their evolutionary novelties AND therefore what is considered a shared characterisitic.

45 Molecular Clocks The molecular clock
Is a yardstick for measuring the absolute time of evolutionary change based on the observation that some genes and other regions of genomes appear to evolve at constant rates 13: so they help track evolutionary time

46 A shared primitive character
Is a homologous structure that predates the branching of a particular clade from other members of that clade Is shared beyond the taxon we are trying to define

47 A shared derived character
Is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade

48 Systematists use a method called outgroup comparison
Outgroups Systematists use a method called outgroup comparison To differentiate between shared derived and shared primitive characteristics

49 As a basis of comparison we need to designate an outgroup
which is a species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species we are studying Outgroup comparison Is based on the assumption that homologies present in both the outgroup and ingroup must be primitive characters that predate the divergence of both groups from a common ancestor

50 The outgroup comparison
Enables us to focus on just those characters that were derived at the various branch points in the evolution of a clade Salamander TAXA Turtle Leopard Tuna Lamprey Lancelet (outgroup) 1 Hair Amniotic (shelled) egg Four walking legs Hinged jaws Vertebral column (backbone) Amniotic egg Vertebral column (a) Character table. A 0 indicates that a character is absent; a 1 indicates that a character is present. (b) Cladogram. Analyzing the distribution of these derived characters can provide insight into vertebrate phylogeny. CHARACTERS Figure 25.11a, b

51 Ultrametric Trees In an ultrametric tree
The branching pattern is the same as in a phylogram, but all the branches that can be traced from the common ancestor to the present are of equal length Drosophila Lancelet Amphibian Fish Bird Human Rat Mouse Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Proterozoic 542 251 65.5 Millions of years ago Figure 25.13

52 Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood
Systematists Can never be sure of finding the single best tree in a large data set Narrow the possibilities by applying the principles of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood

53 Among phylogenetic hypotheses
The most parsimonious tree is the one that requires the fewest evolutionary events to have occurred in the form of shared derived characters

54 Applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics
Human Mushroom Tulip 40% 30% (a) Percentage differences between sequences Figure 25.14

55 Applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics
Tree 1: More likely (b) Comparison of possible trees Tree 2: Less likely 15% 5% 20% 10% 25% Figure 25.14

56 Three possible phylogenetic hypothese
The principle of maximum likelihood States that, given certain rules about how DNA changes over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequence of evolutionary events APPLICATION In considering possible phylogenies for a group of species, systematists compare molecular data for the species. The most efficient way to study the various phylogenetic hypotheses is to begin by first considering the most parsimonious—that is, which hypothesis requires the fewest total evolutionary events (molecular changes) to have occurred. TECHNIQUE Follow the numbered steps as we apply the principle of parsimony to a hypothetical phylogenetic problem involving four closely related bird species. Species I Species II Species III Species IV I II III IV Sites in DNA sequence Three possible phylogenetic hypothese 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A G T Bases at site 1 for each species Base-change event 1 First, draw the possible phylogenies for the species (only 3 of the 15 possible trees relating these four species are shown here). 2 Tabulate the molecular data for the species (in this simplified example, the data represent a DNA sequence consisting of just seven nucleotide bases). 3 Now focus on site 1 in the DNA sequence. A single base- change event, marked by the crossbar in the branch leading to species I, is sufficient to account for the site 1 data. Species Figure 25.15a

57 Figure 25.15b I II III IV GG AA T G 10 events 9 events 8 events
4 Continuing the comparison of bases at sites 2, 3, and 4 reveals that each of these possible trees requires a total of four base-change events (marked again by crossbars). Thus, the first four sites in this DNA sequence do not help us identify the most parsimonious tree. I II III IV GG AA T G 10 events 9 events 8 events 5 After analyzing sites 5 and 6, we find that the first tree requires fewer evolutionary events than the other two trees (two base changes versus four). Note that in these diagrams, we assume that the common ancestor had GG at sites 5 and 6. But even if we started with an AA ancestor, the first tree still would require only two changes, while four changes would be required to make the other hypotheses work. Keep in mind that parsimony only considers the total number of events, not the particular nature of the events (how likely the particular base changes are to occur). Two base changes 6 At site 7, the three trees also differ in the number of evolutionary events required to explain the DNA data. RESULTS To identify the most parsimonious tree, we total all the base-change events noted in steps 3–6 (don’t forget to include the changes for site 1, on the facing page). We conclude that the first tree is the most parsimonious of these three possible phylogenies. (But now we must complete our search by investigating the 12 other possible trees.) Figure 25.15b

58 Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses
The best hypotheses for phylogenetic trees Are those that fit the most data: morphological, molecular, and fossil

59 14. 4 chamber heart is analogous, not homologous
Sometimes there is compelling evidence That the best hypothesis is not the most parsimonious Lizard Four-chambered heart Bird Mammal (a) Mammal-bird clade (b) Lizard-bird clade Figure 25.16a, b

60 Phylograms In a phylogram
The length of a branch in a cladogram reflects the number of genetic changes that have taken place in a particular DNA or RNA sequence in that lineage, #15: ex. crocodiles closer to birds as more DNA is common. Drosophila Lancelet Amphibian Fish Bird Human Rat Mouse Figure 25.12

61 Gene Duplications and Gene Families
Is one of the most important types of mutation in evolution because it increases the number of genes in the genome, providing further opportunities for evolutionary changes

62 Orthologous genes Are genes found in a single copy in the genome
Can diverge only once speciation has taken place Ancestral gene Speciation Orthologous genes (a) Figure 25.17a

63 Paralogous genes Result from gene duplication, so they are found in more than one copy in the genome Can diverge within the clade that carries them, often adding new functions Ancestral gene Gene duplication Paralogous genes Figure 25.17b (b)

64 Orthologous genes are widespread
Genome Evolution Orthologous genes are widespread And extend across many widely varied species The widespread consistency in total gene number in organisms of varying complexity Indicates that genes in complex organisms are extremely versatile and that each gene can perform many functions

65 The Universal Tree of Life
The tree of life Is divided into three great clades called domains: Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya The early history of these domains is not yet clear Bacteria Eukarya Archaea 4 Symbiosis of chloroplast ancestor with ancestor of green plants 1 3 Symbiosis of mitochondrial ancestor with ancestor of eukaryotes 4 Billion years ago 3 2 2 Possible fusion of bacterium and archaean, yielding ancestor of eukaryotic cells 2 3 1 Last common ancestor of all living things 1 Origin of life 4 Figure 25.18

66 Neutral theory states that
Much evolutionary change in genes and proteins has no effect on fitness and therefore is not influenced by Darwinian selection And that the rate of molecular change in these genes and proteins should be regular like a clock

67 Difficulties with Molecular Clocks
The molecular clock Does not run as smoothly as neutral theory predicts

68 Applying a Molecular Clock: The Origin of HIV
Phylogenetic analysis shows that HIV Is descended from viruses that infect chimpanzees and other primates A comparison of HIV samples from throughout the epidemic Has shown that the virus has evolved in a remarkably clocklike fashion


Download ppt "Phylogeny and Systematics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google