1. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing1 FY07/08 Budget Briefing Jonathan Dorfan Director Persis Drell Deputy Director SLAC

2. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing2 Outline  Status of FY06  Opportunities for FY07  FY07 Budget Discussion  Scenarios for FY07  FY08 Budget Discussion  Scenarios for FY08

3. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing3 Status of FY06  FY06  Funding--HEP$145.8M  Funding—BES 29.4M  TOTAL $175.2M  Impact/Opportunities of FY06 budget Full funding to B-factory operations  B-factory AIP reduced $0.5M Strong ILC Program funded at $12.3M Some investment in future opportunities  EXO 200  Accelerator R&D  LSST R&D

4. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing4 Status of FY06 (cont.)  Program Elements B-factory  Technical problem currently limiting luminosity Subject of weekly discussions with program office Impact at ~5% level on long-term luminosity goals  40 running weeks Integrated luminosity projected for FY06: 91/fb  IFR upgrade starts summer 06  Machine upgrades summer 06 GLAST  DOE project complete  Build-up of ISOC Instrument operations support capped at $5M/yr Getting ready for science

5. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing5 Status of FY06 (cont.) ILC R&D  SLAC R&D focus—GDE supported e+e- sources Beam Delivery system Rf power sources Availability and operation Instrumentation  Operations support for L-band klystron development  Leadership positions in many subsystems  Small increase in detector R&D Continued test beam experiments  E166 e+ polarization run completed ATLAS: SLAC has applied to join ATLAS and will submit proposal to become a Tier 2 site for ATLAS

6. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing6 Status of FY06 (cont.) Advanced Accelerator R&D  Plasma wake field acceleration E164/E164X/E167 Optimize program for final FFTB runs Spectacular results, very successful  Laser acceleration experiment progressing in ESB Some slow down due to funding shortfall  SABER white paper developed Workshop March 15/16 Working on operating costs and schedule Possibility of SABER commissioning in FY08

7. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing7 Status of FY06 (cont.)  New Initiatives EXO  EXO200 under construction All resources focused on getting to WIPP 12/06  Barium tagging R&D on hold LSST  Redirected some of resources from GLAST roll off  Build up of collaboration  Resources focused on upcoming competition/ P5 process Director’s review of cost and schedule this week SNAP  Growing into major role in electronics  Natural evolution of expertise developed on GLAST  Small investment from base, growth to come through LBNL

8. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing8 FY07 Budget Discussion  Changes from FY06 to FY07 (Summary) FY06 Funding: $175.2M Program Changes 06->07 11.1M (see slide 9) FY07 Funding Needed:$186.3M FY07 President’s Budget$186.3M  2007 is a year of opportunity! With careful management and close coordination with the national priority setting process, SLAC can help grow programs central to the future of the field.

9. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing9 Program Changes FY06 to FY07 Program Changes in FY07 from FY06M$ Staff Retention 5.0 Power (40 weeks) 4.2 AIP @ $4M, klystron production and detector upgrade complete (3.2) ILC 2.5 Infrastructure 2.0 Additional offset from LCLS and other programs (3.0) Unallocated resources for other new opportunities 3.6 Total Program Changes11.1

10. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing10 Additional Resources Available in FY07  We will continue to manage the staff size down through attrition and targeted programmatic layoffs In all scenarios anticipate an addition ~$1M will be liberated in this fashion  We will continue to manage the transfer of staff from GLAST and B-factory programs to LCLS, ILC and new initiatives Klystron department manpower Electronics engineering Mechanical engineering

11. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing11 Additional FY07 Priority Program Opportunities  LSST We will compete for additional funds to develop ground based dark energy telescope  ILC We will compete for additional funds to develop the RF sources for the ILC  LCD We will compete for additional funds to grow the Linear Collider Detector effort

12. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing12 FY07 Scenario A$195.3M  B-Factory 40 weeks $4M AIP Int L (Run 6)= 180/fb  ILC $21M ILC program focused on GDE priorities  Assumes successfully compete for additional $6M Increase LCD by $1M after successful competition for additional resources  GLAST Instrument operations preparation, support for I&T, preparation for science  EXO 200 operating Invest in Barium tagging R&D for big EXO  Accelerator R&D Start construction of SABER Support HG program from base resources  LSST Increase by $2.1M assuming successful competition for dark energy resources and encouragement from P5  ATLAS Development of Tier 2 assuming successful proposal FY07 President’s Budget + 5%

13. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing13 FY07 Scenario A$ 195.3M  Opportunities B-factory program focused on maximum luminosity before end of FY08 ILC—focused on RF source development taking advantage of unique SLAC resources (klystron dept) EXO—R&D for ultimate double beta decay expt. Go forward with LSST Go forward with SABER  Healthy running program and growth of new opportunities for field Well aligned with HEP roadmap from P5 FY07 President’s Budget + 5%

14. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing14 FY07 Scenario B$186M  B-Factory 40 weeks $4M AIP Int L (Run 6)= 180/fb  ILC $14.8M program focused on GDE priorities  Assumes unsuccessfully compete for additional resources  May lose opportunity to contribute to ILC power source  GLAST Instrument operations preparation, support for I&T, preparation for science  EXO 200 operating Invest in Barium tagging R&D for big EXO  Accelerator R&D Start construction of SABER Support HG program from base resources  LSST Assume unsuccessful competition for dark energy resources Investment from base program depends on P5 recommendation Would be balanced with investment in EXO R&D  ATLAS Development of Tier 2 assuming successful proposal FY07 President’s Budget

15. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing15 FY07 Scenario B$186M  Opportunities B-factory program focused on maximum luminosity before end of FY08 ILC—target modulator development. Cannot engage in klystron development No increase in LCD R&D above small FY06 base level, risking US leadership on detector development Will be guided by P5 recommendations in determining investments in EXO—R&D vs LSST Go forward with SABER  Healthy running program and limited growth of new opportunities for field Will bring headcount down by additional ~15 to allow for new opportunities FY07 President’s Budget

16. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing16 FY07 Scenario C$176.7M  B-Factory 40 weeks $4M AIP Int L (Run 6)= 153/fb  ILC $12.8M program flat from FY06  Lose opportunities to contribute to power source, Cannot grow modulator program Minimal investment in LCD  GLAST Instrument operations preparation, support for I&T, preparation for science. Lay off all staff coming off instrument integration support  EXO 200 operating R&D unfunded  Accelerator R&D SABER unfunded HG program unfunded  LSST Flat or down depending on P5  Staff measures RIF approximately 60 people, impact B-factory performance FY07 President’s Budget – 5%

17. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing17 FY07 Scenario C$176.7M  IMPACTS(Relative to Scenario B) B-factory integrated luminosity hurt by loss of people due to layoffs Compromise SLAC role in ILC Reduction in staff cripples ability to foster new program initiatives for the field.  No new initiatives supported  What HEP physics will we be doing in 2012? FY07 President’s Budget – 5%

18. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing18 FY08 Budget Discussion  Scenarios for FY08 depend on budget in FY07  Talent lost in FY07 cannot be recaptured in FY08  Will assume Scenario A(+5%) in FY07 for Scenario D(+10%) in FY08  Will assume Scenario B(PB) in FY07 for Scenario E(PB)&F(-5%) in FY08

19. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing19 Changes FY07 to FY08 Changes from FY07 from FY08M$ Staff Retention 5.0 Power (+4 weeks operations) 3.3 Total Changes8.3

20. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing20 FY08 Scenario D$204.6M  B-Factory 44 weeks $3.5M AIP Int L (Run 7)= 366/fb  ILC $24M ILC program focused on GDE priorities (Increase $2M over FY07) LCD held flat at FY07 level  GLAST On orbit operations and beginning of science  EXO 200 operating Continued investment in Barium tagging R&D  Accelerator R&D Complete SABER Phase I (no bypass) Support HG program from base resources  LSST Flat assuming encouragement from P5  SNAP Flat or increase with LBNL support  ATLAS Continued development of Tier 2 Scenario A + 5%

21. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing21 FY08 Scenario D$204.6M  Opportunities Final year of B-factory program focused on maximum luminosity before end of run ILC—continued growth in focused areas EXO—R&D for ultimate double beta decay expt. Continued LSST pre-engineering Completion of SABER Phase I (no bypass) and possible operations of plasma program  Healthy running program and growth of new opportunities for field Well aligned with HEP roadmap from P5 Scenario A + 5%

22. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing22 FY08 Scenario E$186M  B-Factory 44 weeks $3.5M AIP Int L (Run 7)=366/fb  ILC $14.8M program flat from FY07. No LCD growth (continued flat from FY06)  GLAST On orbit operations and beginning of science  EXO 200 operating  Accelerator R&D Unable to complete SABER Phase I (no bypass) No support for HG program  LSST & Big EXO R&D FY06 levels or down depending on P5 recommendations  Staff Measures Approximately 35 layoffs FY08 = FY07 President’s Budget

23. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing23 FY08 Scenario E$186M  Opportunities (Relative to scenario B) Final year of B-factory program focused on maximum luminosity before end of run ILC—no growth, SLAC not in leadership role Operations for EXO 200 Very limited resources for LSST camera construction and/or Big EXO R&D Completion of SABER Phase I (no bypass) not possible  Limited possibilities to future program development or ILC contributions Would narrow program (SABER, EXO, LSST, SNAP, ILC) to focus and make one or two successful FY08 = FY07 President’s Budget

24. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing24 FY08 Scenario F$176.7M  B-Factory 44 weeks $3.5M AIP Int L (Run 7)=311/fb  ILC $8.8M program (reduction of $6M vs FY07) No LCD growth (continued flat from FY06)  GLAST On orbit operations and beginning of science  EXO 200 operating  Accelerator R&D Unable to complete SABER Phase I (no bypass) No support for HG program  LSST & Big EXO R&D, Research Programs Would need to eliminate several efforts to recover $3.5M in resources  Staff Measures Approximately 120 layoffs – or limit B-factory running in FY08  Impact on B-factory performance  Impact on research productivity of lab FY08 = FY07 President’s Budget – 5%

25. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing25 FY08 Scenario F$176.7M  IMPACTS (relative to scenario B) B-factory program reduced  Diminished efficiency due to layoffs of technical staff ILC  SLAC minor role in ILC development, jeopardizing international ILC program GLAST  Cut in operations threatens science productivity of the mission EXO and new initiatives not supported No support to Advanced Accelerator Program  No FFTB replacement Approximately 120 additional staff layoffs needed;  Impacts efficiency of B-factory operations FY08 = FY07 President’s Budget – 5%

26. 3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing26 Conclusions  SLAC program offers tremendous physics opportunities to national HEP community Program is tight and aggressively managed  FY07 budget and future Office of Science growth offers significant opportunities for SLAC to serve the national program Investments will be aligned with national roadmap for the field