Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnne Sullivan Modified over 9 years ago
1
#7.5 Campus Partners Working Together to Create Accessible Online Learning Environments
2
Panelists: Steve Adams, Distributed Learning Support Services Lacy K. Ford, Senior Vice Provost Christy Friend, Center for Teaching Excellence Aisha Haynes, Center for Teaching Excellence Karen Pettus, Student Disability Services
3
Overview Vice-Provost’s Introduction (video) Quality Review Timeline Background (pre-2010) Groundwork (2010-2013) Building a process (2013-2014) Year 1 Successes Challenges and Next Steps
4
Introduction Senior Vice Provost Lacy K. Ford Commitment to Quality Accessible Online Courses Link to Senior Vice Provost Lacy K. Ford Video
5
Total Enrollment45,457 Undergraduate36,220 Graduate6,867 Professional1,470 Main and Senior Campuses Columbia Aiken Upstate Beaufort Regional Campuses Lancaster Salkehatchie Sumter Union University of South Carolina
6
Background Thirty-two graduate degree and certificate programs through DL Online (Blackboard, Adobe Connect), DVD & telepresence Enrollment Growth 10,365 (AY 09) 13,665 (AY 10) 15,582 (AY 11) 16,602 (AY 12) 17,883 (AY 13) 18,808 (AY 14)
7
Timeline 2010 Vice Provost assumes leadership of distributed learning 2011- 2012 CTE Instructional designers hired University subscribes to Quality Matters Sept. 2012 OCR presentation on accessibility 2012- 2013 Provost announces DL quality review Accessibility guidelines created 2013- 2014 Course review process, Year 1
8
2010 Distributed Learning Move by Vice Provost Academic services leadership Closer involvement with academic units Course approval process revision Unified vision and blueprint Collaboration established
9
2011-2012 Instructional Designers hired University subscription to Quality Matters Program Training for Instructional Designers 7 Ways to Make Your Class Accessible
10
2011-2012 September 24 th, 2012: OCR presentation on accessibility of online material New online technologies and delivery modes Enterprise applications and opportunities
11
2012-2013 Dr. Ford’s assessment of online courses Adoption of Quality Matters rubric for best practices $1,500 course revision grant for faculty
12
Spring 2013 Provost’s Quality Review Process Created Process begins and ends with faculty Rubric addresses course quality and accessibility Collaborative units provide ongoing support Provost’s Office announces and provides incentives
13
Spring 2013 DL Course Review Flow Chart
14
Summer 2013 Getting the Word Out Documents sent to department chairs/deans CTE develops forms and resources Faculty DL committee consulted
15
2013-2014 Process Underway Designers worked with faculty to revise courses Weekly CTE meetings to discuss review process Designers review courses and make recommendations Faculty DL Quality Assurance committee reviewed materials/made recommendations
16
2013-2014 Getting Faculty Buy-In Campus partners streamline process for faculty Process begins and ends with departments/faculty Emphasis on flexibility and meeting faculty needs Incentives/recognition for successful course revisions
17
Results Year 1 (108 courses): 34 passed review 16 expected to pass by Fall 2014 27 retired by department 22 faculty received $1500 + commendation letter
18
Success Story 1: Vera Polyakova-Norwood Director of Online Learning Nursing Challenge: Transcripts for frequent lecture updates Solutions: Faculty pooled grant funds Use Dragon Naturally Speaking and Student Assistants
19
Success Story 2: Maureen Petkewich Instructor Statistics Challenge: Captions for videos showing math calculations Solution: Supplemental grant funds to hire captioning service
20
Success Story 3: Rebecca Collier Adjunct Faculty Women & Gender Studies Challenge: Retrofitting existing voiceover PowerPoint lectures Solutions: Teaching assistant created transcripts Will create scripts for future lecture preparation “I like how the PowerPoint videos have a notes tab that puts in words exactly what you are saying in the videos, allows me to follow along and take good notes easily.”
21
Other Successes 11 faculty/8 staff receive award from Disability Services Invitations to present at conferences Faculty and student testimonials
22
Next Steps Quality Review for all DL graduate courses Goal: All DL courses undergo review every 3-5 years Goal: Work with technology services to create system-wide accessibility solutions
23
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.