1. College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston & Associates

2. April 30, 2012Andrews Kurth1 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR REDISTRICTING Population Equality: “One Person — One Vote”  Baker v. Carr  Reynolds v. Sims Protections Against Discrimination of Racial, Ethnic, and Language Minorities  Voting Rights Act Equal Protection/14th Amendment: Redistricting Based on Race  Shaw v. Reno  Bush v. Vera Texas Constitution: Equal Protection Clause and Equal Rights Amendment

3. April 30, 2012Andrews Kurth2  Local governments are required to draw districts that are “substantially equal in population”  Ten Percent Standard: Maximum deviation in population between the largest and the smallest districts  Courts will look at any significant deviation on a case-by-case basis, evaluating all factors used by the governmental body to draw districts  Courts recognize the importance of making districts compact, respecting traditional boundaries, maintaining communities of interest, preserving the core of prior districts, and avoiding contests between incumbents POPULATION EQUALITY: “ONE PERSON — ONE VOTE”

4. April 30, 2012Andrews Kurth3 VOTING RIGHTS ACT: PROTECTION AGAINST RACIAL, ETHNIC AND LANGUAGE MINORITY DISCRIMINATION  Voting Rights Act was enacted to provide minority voters an opportunity to participate in the electoral process and to elect candidates of their choice.  Enacted in 1965 to prohibit a government from imposing a “voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice or procedure... in a manner which results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.”  Voting Rights Act was amended in 1975 to include protections for members of language minority groups.

5. April 30, 2012Andrews Kurth4 PRIORITIES AND PRINCIPLES FOR REDISTRICTING (1)The five COM Single Member Trustee Districts will be of substantially equal population and, in no event, exceed a ten percent top to bottom deviation. (2)The new COM Single Member Trustee Districts should be contiguous and reasonably compact. (3)The new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will be based, to the extent possible, on the existing trustee district composition. (4)Where possible, COM will use easily identifiable geographic boundaries as district boundaries. (5)Where possible, the COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will seek to maintain communities of interest in a single district and avoid splitting neighborhoods when drawing district lines.

6. April 30, 2012Andrews Kurth5 PRIORITIES AND PRINCIPLES FOR REDISTRICTING (continued) (6)The COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will use whole county voting precincts, whenever possible, to draw trustee districts. (7)The new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will adhere to the Voting Rights Act and avoid retrogression in the position of racial, ethnic and language minorities with respect to the effective exercise of their right to vote. (8)The new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will adhere to the Equal Protection Clause and will not use race as the predominate factor in developing the plan. (9)Recognizing the value of incumbent-constituency relations, the new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will seek to keep existing trustees in their existing districts.

7. 6April 30, 2012

8. 7

9. 8

10. 9

11. 10April 30, 2012

12. 11April 30, 2012

13. 12April 30, 2012

14. 13April 30, 2012

15. 14April 30, 2012

16. 15April 30, 2012

17. 16April 30, 2012

18. 17April 30, 2012

19. 18April 30, 2012

20. 19April 30, 2012

21. 20April 30, 2012

22. 21April 30, 2012

23. Andrews Kurth22 Questions Gene Locke Andrews Kurth LLP 600 Travis Suite 4200 Houston, Texas (713) 220-3956 genelocke@andrewskurth.com Leslie Johnston Johnston & Associates (325) 379-1245 lesliemj@swbell.net