1. Bayh College of Education September 23, 2011 The Educator as Mediator of Learning Assessment Day 2011

2. Bayh College of Education Conceptual Framework Becoming a Complete Professional Assessment Day 2011 Place CF image here Becoming a Complete Professional Educator as an Expert or Mediator of Learning Educator as a Member of Communities Educator as a Person

3. Past Assessments Program Assessments Discussion Implement Intuitive decision making Program meetings Department meetings Program-levelWhatever is required by an accrediting body Where we have been Assessment Day 2011

4. Unit Assessment System (UAS) Program Assessments Unit Assessment Discussion Implement Program meetings Department meetings UAS/TEC meetings Assessment Day Program level Unit level New stuff Key assessments across all programs: Field Experiences Dispositions Technology Work Sample Diversity Unit Operations* Transition Points SPA Aggregation of program data, and disaggregation of Unit data: UAS Committee Assessment Center Assessment Handbook Candidate Complaints Where we are going Assessment Day 2011 See UAS Program Assessment Matrix

5. Where we are 2009-2011 Data Assessment Day 2011 Student Teaching Work Samples Field Evaluations

6. CIMT Unit Report 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 Exceeds expectations ranges from 53.1% - 77.4%, means from 2.52-2.79 in 2009-2010. Exceeds expectations ranges from 59.9% - 78.1%, means from 2.50-2.81 in 2010-2011. Evidences overall strength – highest area being Activities in the Unit, lowest being Evaluation of Effectiveness of the Unit. No basis is 16.9% - 23.4% for Fostering Relationships with Colleagues and Community. Assessment Day 2011

7. What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? An ongoing theme….

8. “You are the average of the five people you spend the most time with.” - E. James Rohn Look around…..

9. CIMT Field Evaluation of Teaching Composite Area Means range from 2.46 – 2.59 in 2009-2010. Composite Area Means range from 2.40 – 2.75 in 2010-2011. Evidences stable and strong scores. Some standards are receiving sizable percentages of No Basis marks: Engages students in testing hypotheses, Uses knowledge of student backgrounds, Uses instructional technology effectively (2009-2010 only), Maintains useful records, Encourages self assessment by students, Interacts productively with other professionals, Participates in school activities beyond the classroom. 65.3% No Basis 2009-2010. 73.0% No Basis 2010-2011. Assessment Day 2011

10. ELED Field Evaluation of Teaching Numeric ratings from 2009-2010 are missing from the system. Vast majority of ratings indicate Meets Expectations. All standards appear equally strong, with composite means ranging from 2.05 to 2.21. Assessment Day 2011

11. School Psychology Field Evaluation Majority of ratings at Exceeds Expectations. Means range from 1.88 to 2.38. Three items evidence one student at Does Not Meet, one item evidences two students at Does Not Meet. Educational Leadership M.Ed. Program Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.00 to 2.17. Educational Leadership Ed.S. Program Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.60 to 2.80. Assessment Day 2011

12. Special Education Program Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Vast majority are at Exceeds Expectations. Educational Technology Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.54 to 2.88 2009-2010. Means range from 2.67 to 2.93 2010-2011. Assessment Day 2011

13. What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? Field Evaluations

14. Student Teaching Evaluations Small N in 2009-2010 urges caution in interpretation. Majority of ratings indicate Exceeds Expectations. Exceeds Expectations range from 44.8% to 86.2% in 2010-2011. All areas appear equally strong, with composite means ranging from 2.60 to 2.75 (2010- 2011). Three items show sizable No Basis percentages 2010-2011; Engages students in testing hypotheses (10.5%), Interacts productively with parents and guardians (21.5%), and Participates in school activities beyond the classroom (14.7%). Assessment Day 2011

15. What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? Student Teaching

16. …those who were dancing were considered insane by those who could not hear the music.

17. ELED Teacher Work Sample Small N in 2009-2010 stymies overall interpretation. 2010-2011 Exceeds expectations range from 36.5% - 95.2%, with means from 2.27 -2.94. Evidences overall strength. A few areas show near or above 10% of Does Not Meet Expectations; Active Engagement (14.5%), Daily Formative Assessments (9.7%), Includes teacher-made assessment or rubric (14.3%), Modifications Based on Analysis (12.7%), Collaboration with Families (9.5%) and Revisions/Edits (9.5%). Assessment Day 2011

18. Educational Leadership Ed.S. Program Work Sample Small N in 2010-2011. All ratings indicate Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.00 to 2.61 2009-2010. Assessment Day 2011 Educational Leadership M.Ed. Program Work Sample All ratings indicate Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.09 to 2.13 2009-2010. Means range from 2.39 to 2.66 2010-2011. School Counseling Program Work Sample All ratings indicate Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.36 to 2.80 2009-2010. Means range from 2.00 to 2.89 2010-2011.

19. Communication Disorders Program Work Sample Majority of ratings are at Meets Expectations. Means range from 1.44 to 2.00 2009-2010. Means range from 1.83 to 2.00 2010-2011. Intervention Plan and Data Collection and Analysis have sizable percentages at Does Not Meet Expectations 2009-2010. School Psychology Program Work Sample Small N 2010-2011. Majority of ratings are at Meets Expectations. Indicates strong scores with three areas of relative difficulty 1.Clearly operationalized (42.9% and 66.7% Does not meet), 2.Barriers to success (71.4% and 66.7% Does not meet) and 3.Available strengths (42.9% and 66.7% Does not meet). Assessment Day 2011

20. Elementary Education Program Work Sample Small N 2010-2011. All ratings are at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Majority of ratings are Exceeds 2009-2010. Majority are Meets 2010-2011. Curriculum and Instruction Program Work Sample All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations, with the vast majority being Exceeds. Educational Technology Program Work Sample All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Majority of ratings are at Exceeds Expectations. Standards one and two evidence consistently higher ratings. Assessment Day 2011

21. What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? Work Samples

22. The role of the parent is to prepare the child for the path, not to prepare the path for the child.

23. Breakout Sessions Work SamplesRoom 111 Student TeachingRoom 113 InternshipsRoom 114 SPA ReportsRoom 215 Culture of Assessment Survey results Assessment Day 2011

24. Assessment Day Debrief Work Samples Student Teaching Internships SPA Reports Next Steps….

25. Thanks for coming! Assessment Day 2011