Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySydney Maxwell Modified over 9 years ago
1
Tigard-Tualatin Spring site visit overview April 23, 2008
2
Targets Define Response to Intervention Provide an overview of EBIS implementation Learn about TTSD’s history, demographics, program and outcomes Give a quick overview of what you will and will not see today
3
Expectations for today Please silence cell phones and refrain from using them in schools No pictures – please respect confidentiality Respect timeline Go to the school to which you are assigned
4
Oregon RTI Project
5
7 pilot elementary schools implement EBS Board adopts EBS district- wide: 5 more schools implement 1996 1997 Remaining (2) schools implement; ongoing training & leadership 1998- 2000 EBIS OSEP Grant: Reading & Special Education initiatives incorporated 2001 Secondary School focus utilizing Title IVa 2003 TTSD Develops and revises the RTI Technical Assistance Manual for ODE 2005 2005-2010 ODE Contracts with TTSD to Train 28 School Oregon Districts to Develop & Implement RTI Tigard-Tualatin’s EBIS Implementation Timeline
6
If you came to Tigard today to see RTI in action you will leave disappointed.
7
If you came to Tigard today to see MTI you will leave very happy!
8
Defining Terms: Is a system of organizing gen. ed. curriculum and instruction to meet the needs of all students Integrates all support programs to use resources more efficiently Applies to all students Can exist without using RTI Is an evaluation procedure identified in IDEA for identifying learning disabilities Is a special education procedure that is limited to assessment Applies only to children suspected of having LD Cannot be implemented without a system like MTI in place Multi-Tiered Instruction (MTI) Response to Intervention (RTI)
9
Professional Development Special Education ELL District Office Title Programs Curriculum Development Response to Intervention
10
Multi-tiered, Research-based Core Curriculum & Interventions Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring Standardized Decision Rules & Procedures Integrity of Implementation and Sustainability MTI: Support for All Learners rti (SLD Assessment Under IDEA) Effective Teaming & Problem Solving
11
A Tale of Two Teams Does the child find the system, or does the system find the child?
12
Daisy participates in the general curriculum Daisy isn’t doing well Teacher tries again Pre-referral team reviews what teacher has tried Resumes regular program Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy improves Teacher’s effort is deemed sufficient Special Education referral is initiated by the teacher Daisy’s teacher does his best to differentiate instruction and keeps anecdotal data Teacher is told to try again The pre referral/discrepancy approach Daisy is tested, usually by special education personnel, using IQ, achievement, and other tests
13
Daisy participates in the general curriculum Daisy isn’t doing well Second Group Intervention EBIS Team designs individualized intervention Resumes general program Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy improves Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy improves Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause Special Education referral is initiated EBIS Team reviews screening data and places Daisy in group intervention Parents Notified How RTI Works from a Student’s Perspective
14
Think, Pair, Share How do the two team processes differ? How are teams currently organized in your district? How would your team process look different in a multi-tiered, RTI system? Does the child find the system, or does the system find the child?
15
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success
16
Tier I All students receive Tier I Research-based core reading curriculum Strong fidelity and professional development Universal screening of all students
17
Tier I Reading Programs for ALL students Elementary Treasures Screened with DIBELS Middle and High School Priority standards Holt –Elements of Literature & Elements of Language Common novels Screened with OAKS percentile and MAZE
18
Tier II Elementary 90 minutes of Treasures plus strategic intervention Research-based intervention program Small group 20-30 min. daily Progress monitoring with DIBELS Secondary 45 minutes of Language Arts class 45 minutes of an additional class focusing on Reading Progress Monitoring with MAZE
19
Tier II Elementary Interventions Ladders to Literacy PA in Young Children Road to the Code Earobics Daisy Castle Triumphs Read Naturally SFA Tutoring Phonics For Reading STARS Reading Success REWARDS Six-Minute Solution
20
Tier II Secondary Intervention Middle School Soar to Success 45 minutes/day High School Double the time of instruction Incorporates standard LA curriculum and research based reading strategies
21
Tier III Elementary 90 minutes of Treasures plus intensive intervention Research-based intervention program Small group 45+ min. daily Progress monitoring with DIBELS Secondary 90 minutes of Language! Progress monitoring with MAZE
22
Tier III Elementary Interventions ERI Language for Learning Fast Track Phonics Reading Mastery Horizons Language for Thinking Reading Success Great Leaps Corrective Reading
23
Tier III Secondary Interventions Language! 90 minutes a day
24
Reading Protocol
25
TTSD Demographics 17 Schools, 12,461 students 10 elementary, 3 middle, 2 high, 1 alternative, & 1 charter Special Programs participation 1,264 Special Education (10%) 1,509English Language Learners (12%) 1,682 Intellectually Gifted and TAG (13%) Socio-economic status Title One in 6 elementary schools Free and reduced lunch percentage Metzger 59%, Templeton 45%, Durham 38% Data collected: 4/09
26
TTSD Outcomes: Children identified as LD in 1 st (4) and 2 nd (20) grade Improvement in Reading and Math scores for students with disabilities and English language learners Achievement growth for all students
27
Does it work? Yes! 2007-2008 Tigard-Tualatin SD 23J; Total Population; Reading & Lit Grade LevelPerformance LevelTTSD%OR% Grade 03Meets or Exceeds89.10%83.90% Grade 05Meets or Exceeds85.00%75.40% Grade 08Meets or Exceeds72.10%65.30% Grade 10Meets or Exceeds73.40%64.80%
28
Limited English Proficiency
30
Special Education
32
Total Population
34
What you can expect for today Core program instruction Interventions Conversation with principal and literacy specialist
35
What else could happen? Conversation with teachers Progress monitoring Schedules
36
Some things we can’t show you, but trust us they are there and we will discuss.... EBIS team meeting Process at every TTSD school Leadership Professional development Universal Screener Every child is screened K-5 DIBELS, 6-12 OAKS and MAZE
37
A closing thought before you go RTI is, first and foremost, about good teaching: Even before students are formally classified as having “learning disabilities,” those who need more assistance receive additional interventions…So RTI is as much a prevention model as an identification model. - Michael Hock, WestEd
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.