Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

From GLM to HLM Working with Continuous Outcomes EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "From GLM to HLM Working with Continuous Outcomes EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez."— Presentation transcript:

1 From GLM to HLM Working with Continuous Outcomes EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez

2 Continuous Variables Review statistical procedures for continuous variables Consider options on Variables Chart Generalize options under the GLM approach

3 Statistical Paradigm Model Building Estimation of Parameters Testing Fit of the Model

4 Model Building Theory Model Specification Measurement Data Collection

5 Estimation of Parameters Conceptualizing Relevant Factors A General Approach to Data Analysis GLM Model Assumptions

6 General Approach to Data Analysis Univariate & bivariate descriptive analyses Specifying the model Testing interaction terms Removing insignificant terms Examining outliers Checking assumptions

7 General Linear Model Assumptions STOCHASTIC Independence Normality Mean of zero Homogeneity of variance Independence from explanatory variables STRUCTURAL Independent observations Linear relationships Variable independence Errorless measurement Correct specification

8 Testing Model-Data Fit Parsimony Indicators – Correlation – Simple Regression – Multiple Regression Controlling Type-I error

9 Common Problems in the analysis of clustered (nested) data The “unit of analysis” problem – misestimated precision Testing hypotheses about effects occurring at each level and across levels Problems related to measurement of change or growth

10  Estimation of parameters requires some distributional assumptions. One requires the error term (the part of the outcome that is not explained by observed factors) to be independent and identically distributed.  This is in contrast with the idea that people exist within meaningful relationships in organizations. Frank, K. (1998). Quantitative methods for studying social contexts. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171-216. Estimation Requirements

11 Handout: Elements of the Regression Line The Notation of Regression or

12 What’s in a name… Sociology: Multilevel Models Biometrics: Mixed-Effects Models or Random-Effects Models Econometrics: Random-Coefficient Regression Models Statistics: Covariance Components Models

13 When to use HLM Nested data: Dependent observations Do children of different gender, race, or exposure to different reading programs grow at the same rate in reading? Is the relationship between social status and achievement the same in schools of different size or sector (public v. catholic)?

14 Building Models in HLM Level One – Within Units Level Two – Between Units

15 Examples of Multiple Levels Level 1Level 2Level 3 StudentsClassroomsSchools TeachersSchoolsSchool Districts ChildrenFamiliesNeighborhoods FamiliesNeighborhoodsCities NursesWards/UnitsHospitals WorkersUS-Based FirmsMultinational Firms Juvenile DelinquentsSocial WorkersSocial Service Agencies Longitudinal ScoresStudentsTeachers

16 Advantages of HLM Adjusting for nonindependence of observations within subjects Larger framework for real-life problems Unbalanced designs and missing data are accommodated

17 Alternatives to HLM Individual level example Group level example Just use regression

18 What do we gain through HLM?  Improved estimation of effects within individual units. Example: Developing an improved estimate of a regression model for an individual school by borrowing strength from the fact that similar relationships exist for other schools.

19 What do we gain through HLM?  Formulation and testing of hypotheses about cross-level effects. Example: How school size might be related to the magnitude of the relationship between social class and academic achievement within schools.

20 What do we gain through HLM?  Partitioning variance and covariance components among levels. Example: Decomposing the correlation among a set of student-level variables into within- and between-school components. How much of the variance is within or between schools?

21 A relationship between 8 th grade and 11 th grade performance? Goldstein (1999). http://www.arnoldpublishers.com/support/goldstein.htm

22 Accounting for school Goldstein (1999). http://www.arnoldpublishers.com/support/goldstein.htm

23 Socioeconomic Status Achievement When school is a meaningful organizational unit, relations may be a function of the unit.

24 Example Model


Download ppt "From GLM to HLM Working with Continuous Outcomes EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google