Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKimberly Wells Modified over 11 years ago
1
EURISOL DS: European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility Design Study NuPECC meeting, Venice 18-19 March, 05 G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
2
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 THE GOAL: Producing an engineering oriented study of the EURISOL Facility and developing prototypes of the most critical parts of the facility itself. Starting point: EURISOL RTD Recommendations
3
IDENTITY CARD EC CONTRIBUTION: (k)9161.9 - FTE 113,25 (p*y) EC CONTRIBUTION: (k) 9161.9 - FTE 113,25 (p*y) TASKS: 1+11 TASKS: 1+11 (MANAGEMENT + FOUR TOPIC AREAS) PARTICIPANTS: 20 (15 countries involved) GANIL (F), CNRS/IN2P3 (F), INFN (I), CERN (UE), UCL (B), CEA (F), NIPNE (RO), JYU (FI), LMU (G), FZJ (G), FI (LT), UW (PL), SAS (SK), U- LIVERPOOL (UK), GSI (G), USDC (E), CCLRC (UK), PSI (CH), IPUL (LV), SU MSL (SE) PROJECT ESTIMATED TOTAL EFFORTS: (k) 32.284,3 - FTE 490,45 ( p*y) DURATION OF THE PROJECT: 48 MONTHS STARTING DATE: FEBRUARY 1st, 2005 COORDINATING INSTITUTION: GANIL (F) CONTRIBUTORS: 20 (12 countries involved from Europe, Asia and North America) U-FRANKFURT (G), BUDKER (RU),VNIIFT (RU), PNPI (RU), ORNL (USA), ANL (USA), KAERI (SKR), TRIUMF (CA), JAERI (JP), SOREQ (IL), U-MAINZ (G), VINCA (YU), KVI (NL), U-SURREY (UK), U-YORK (UK), U-PAISLEY (UK), U-UPPSALA (SE), NSCL (USA), FNAL (USA), HUG (CH) Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
4
FEBRUARY, 1st 2005 PROJECT STARTING DATE FEBRUARY, 2-3, 2005 KICK-OFF MEETINGS KICK-OFF MEETINGS FEBRUARY, 25TH, 2005 END OF NEGOTIATION PHASE, CONTRACT IN PREPARATION END OF NEGOTIATION PHASE, CONTRACT IN PREPARATION MARCH/APRIL 2005 ESTIMATED PERIOD OF CONTRACT SIGNATURE ( GANIL/EC ) MAY/JUNE 2005 ESTIMATED PERIOD OF UE PRE-FINANCING Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 EURISOL.DS MILESTONES OF THIS SEMESTER
5
0 CONTRACT SIGNATURE TIMETABLE CONTRACT SENT TO GANIL 10 35 CONTRACT RETURN TO EC CONTRACT SIGNED BY EC DAYS ACCESS TO THE CONTRACT BY PARTICIPANTS ( 45 DAYS) 75 PRE-FINANCING PAYMENT TO GANIL (45 DAYS) 95 BANK TRASFER TO THE PARTICIPANT Design Study
6
G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 PROJECT ACTIVITIES PROJECT ACTIVITIES
7
4 TOPIC AREAS EURISOL DS MANAGEMENT (GANIL/INFN-LNL/CNRS-IN2P3/CERN) 1 Targets and ion sources (Synergies with neutron spallation sources and neutrino facilities) –Multi-MW target station : liquid- mercury converter (CERN) –Direct target : Several target-ion source systems (CERN) –Fission target : UC x target optimization (INFN-LNL) 2 Accelerators (Synergies with HIPPI (CARE)) –Proton accelerator design: the driver (INFN-LNL): –Heavy ion accelerator design: the post accelerator (GANIL) –SC cavity development: cavity prototypes and multipurpose cryomodule (CNRS- IN2P3/IPNO) 3 Physics, beams and safety (Synergies with EURONS) –Physics and instrumentation: conceptual design of novel instruments (U-LIVERPOOL) –Beam intensity calculations: yield optimization of RIB species (GSI) –Safety and radioprotection: radiation fields, activation, shielding, handling, storage, conformity to legislation (CEA) 4 Beta-Beams Aspects (Synergies with BENE (CARE), EURONS) –Beam preparation : breeders, 60 GHz ECR source (JYV) –Beta-beam aspects: conceptual design report of the Beta-Beam facility. It includes preliminary studies on modifications of CERN accelerators in case the facility is sited at CERN ( CERN) Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
8
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
9
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 44 9 13 8 5 3 9 15 99 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Management Multi MW Target Station Direct Target Fission Target Safety& Radioprotection Heavy Ion Accelerator Design Proton Accelerator Design SC Cavity Development Beam Preparation Physics and Instrumentation Beam Intensity Calculations Beta Beams Aspects Participants and Contributors per task
10
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
11
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
12
Design Study
14
G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION
15
STEERING COMMITTEE 1 representative of each Participant + Management Board and Chairs of NUPECC, ESGARD, EURONS (all ex-officio) 1 meeting/year MANAGEMENT BOARD Project Leader + 3 Members MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TEAM 1. Administrative Office 2. Scientific liaison Office 3. Technical coordinator COORDINATION BOARD Management Board + Task Leaders + Coordinators of HIPPI JRA and BENE Network (ex-officio) 2-3 Meetings/year INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANEL 3 Members – 1 Meeting/year ANNUAL PARTICIPANT MEETING 1 Meeting/year Task 2Task 3Task 1 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
16
STEERING COMMITTEE It is the governing body of the DESIGN STUDY determining the political and strategic orientation of the project: - activity planning, allocation of the resources, management appointment, inclusion and withdrawal of contractors. VOTING RULES: quorum 2/3 of members - usually majority 3/4 of votes - simple majority for Chair, MB and IAP appointment - unanimous vote for inclusion or withdrawal of contractors Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
17
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 Without voting rights With voting rights INSTITUTIONREPRESENTATIVE 1GANILProf. Dominique GOUTTE 2CNRS/IN2P3Prof. Sydney GALES 3INFNDr. Gabriele PUGLIERIN 4CERNDr. Enrico CHIAVERI 5UCLDr. Marc LOISELET 6CEADr. N. ALAMANOS 7NIPNEProf. Nicolae Victor ZAMFIR 8JYUProf. Juha AYSTO 9LMUProf. Dietrich HABS 10FZJDr. Heiner BRUECHER 11FIDr. Arturas PLUKIS 12UWProf. Jerzy JASTRZEBSKI 13SASProf. Emil BETAK 14U-LIVERPOOLProf. Paul NOLAN 15GSIProf. Klaus SUEMMERER 16USDCProf. Jose BENLLIURE 17CCLRCProf. David WARNER 18PSIProf. Heinz GAEGGELER 19IPULProf. Janis FREIBERGS 20SU MSLProf. Anders KALLBERG Members of EURISOL DS Steering Committee Chaired by Juha Aysto NUPECC CHAIRMANProf. Mushin HARAKEH ESGARD CHAIRMANProf. Roy ALEKSAN EURONS CHAIRMANProf. Alex MUELLER MANAGEMENT BOARD
18
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
19
MANAGEMENT BOARD ( It is chaired by the Project Leader) - Ensuring communication between consortium and EC - Taking care of all legal, contractual, financial and administrative activities - Overseeing of all technical and scientific activities - Monitoring and ensuring the Global coherence of the project - Ensuring the respect for contract obligations and results - Securing protection, use,dissemination of the results - Task leaders appointment - Analysing and reporting on site options and on the funding mechanism of the EURISOL facility. - VOTING RULES: unanimous consent basis Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
20
The Management Board Chaired by the Project Leader Graziano Fortuna: (T1,T4,T7,T8), Project Leader Yorick Blumenfeld ( T5,T6,T11) Peter Butler ( T9, T10 ) Mats Lindroos (T2, T3, T12) Technical Coordinator ( without voting rights) Management Support Team Administrative Office: R. Battistella, V. Vandevoorde Scientific liaison Office: A. Andrighetto, M. Comunian Technical Coordinator: J. Cornell Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
21
COORDINATION BOARD ( It is chaired by the Project Leader) 1.to present reports on the progress of the individual task 2.to make proposal concerning or modifying programme to be conducted 3.to make proposal concerning the allocation or the re- allocation of specific task among the contractors 4.to draft the project reports 5.to identify contractor presenting financial or technical risks 6.to resolve technical problems or any difficulty arising in connection with the task implementation 7.to foster the connectivity among the individual task 8.to evaluate and favour possible synergies with other projects VOTING RULES: quorum 2/3 of members majority 3/4 of votes Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
22
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 TASKREPRESENTATIVE 1 Project Leader G. Fortuna 1 MB Member Y. Blumenfeld 1 MB Member P. Butler 1 MB Member M. Lindroos 2 Multi MW Target Station Y. Kadi 3 Direct Target J. Lettry 4 Fission Target L. Tecchio 5 Safety & Radioprotection D. Ridikas 6 Heavy Ion Accelerator Design M-H. Moscatello 7 Proton accelerator Design A. Facco 8 SC Cavity Development S. Bousson 9 Beam Preparation A. Jokinen 10 Physics and Instrumentation R. Page 11 Beam Intensity Calculations K.H. Schmidt 12 Beta Beams Aspects M. Benedikt Without voting rights Technical Coordinator J. Cornell HIPPY (CARE)Dr. Roland GAROBY BENE (CARE) Dr. Vittorio PALLADINO With voting rights List of members of Coordination Board
23
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
24
INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANEL (appointed by the SC at the kick-off meeting) –It is composed of three Int. Experts covering the domains of RIB Science, accelerators and high power production targets –It is in charge with critical assessment of the technical and scientific aspects of the Project –It may be consulted, any time, by the SC and MB on specific scientific and organizational aspects. Members elected by SC: P.Schmor (Triumf), K. Hubner (Cern), W. Nazarewicz (Ornl) Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
25
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 KICK-OFF MEETINGS OUTPUTS
26
CB kick-off meeting(Orsay 3 Feb. 05) summary and recommendations 1.Annex1 fully compatible with the content of the proposal 2.Concern about the delay between project starting date ( Feb. 1st,o5) and date of EU funds availability (July 05); difficulties are anticipated by some contractors because lack of resources 3.Need to fix reference parameters of the various parts of the facility. A set of such parameters will be collected by the TC and discussed at the next CB meeting of July 8th, 05 4.Synergies with HIPPI and BENE already exist, HIPPI and EURISOL activities on proton linacs are fully complementary ; the impact of the project Linac4 on EURISOL short and long term strategy in terms of design solutions: pulsed versus CW machines and consequences on the high power target lifetime Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
27
SC-kick-off meeting (Orsay 4th Feb. 05) summary and recommendations 1.The need of a standing IAP was deeply debated. The consensus was reached on the basis of a Panel mission focussed on technical and scientific matters. 2.Synergies with HIPPI, BENE, EURONS and EUROTRANS were discussed. It was recommended to cultivate all the possible contacts, exchange of information, collaboration in specific WP, invitation to meetings of common interest. 3.The impact of pulsed machines on target lifetime was discussed. The subject is of extreme importance in case of driver sharing among different users ( RIB, Beta beams, neutrino factories…) Quantitative exploration to which extent a RIB target could withstand high power pulsed beam operation is needed. 4.Investigating the use of the Beta beam rings to push the RIB energies well over 100 MeV*A for secondary fragmentation. Some reference parameters should be fixed for the next SC meeting. 5.Implementation of an electronic data management to facilitate the flow of information within and outside the EURISOL community ( EDMS-CERN type suggested) Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
28
MB kick-off meeting (Orsay Feb. 4th, 05) Summary and actions –EURISOL web-site: implemented in the next 3 months; –Publications: written note on the policy to be followed complying with EC rules; –Site options: all bodies are very sensitive to this matter. According to the work plan,the MB should produce a report on site options, in a period of 6 months, starting from month 24. –It is suggested that a draft paper containing the guidelines to face the site options problem should be presented to the next SC meeting; –VII FP: Is there room for a new application in the contest of ESFRI roadmap? This should be decided according to the NuPECC strategy. Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
29
Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05 CONCLUSIONS
30
1.Signature of the contract (April 05, Ganil /EC) 2.Access to the contract by participants ( June 05, Ganil- Participants) 3.Signature of the Consortium Agreement (April/May 05, Participants) Tentative dates of the 2005 official meetings - April, 18th : MB meeting - July, 8th : CB Meeting - October MB meeting (to be fixed) - Nov, 28th –Dec 1st : EURISOL Ds week During the week the following meetings will take place:( *) a) Annual participants meeting b) CB meeting c) IAP meeting d) Steering Committee meeting f) MB meeting ( *)Aim of the EURISOL week: Review and monitor the activities of the year, check the overall project planning, extend the discussion and the confrontation on the achieved results to all community, approve the general lines (technical, scientific and financial matters) of the yearly reports, discuss and approve the activities planning for the incoming year taking into account the suggestion given by the community. Design Study G. Fortuna, Venice March 05
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.