Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJesse Dobson Modified over 11 years ago
1
Students with Disabilities in 2010-2011
2
New AYP Targets Reading 3-8 71.6% 28.4% Math 3-8 88.6% 11.4% Reading 10 69.3% 30.8% Math 10 84.2% 15.8%
4
2011 Met w/Impr on 5 yr. rate (2% impr or >=80%, 4 yr; 3% impr or >=80%, 5 yr) 2010 Not Met (0.1% impr or >=80%) 2009 Met w/Impr on 4 yr. rate (0.1% impr or >=80%)
5
Cohort Data All grades declined in % proficient.
6
Cohort Data 4 th & 5 th grade improved. All other grades declined.
7
Both reading and math have the lowest % of schools meeting growth for SWD in a 5 year history.
8
Both Reading and Math % of students making growth declined from 2010 to 2011
11
Student Eligibility for NCEXTEND2 – Red Flags Proficient scores on general Proficient scores on general Evidence of growth on general Evidence of growth on general No opportunity to be assessed on general, with or without accommodations No opportunity to be assessed on general, with or without accommodations History of high Level IV scores on NCEXTEND2 (especially at lower grades) History of high Level IV scores on NCEXTEND2 (especially at lower grades) 11
13
Student Eligibility for NCEXTEND1 – Red Flags Proficient scores on general or NCEXTEND2 Proficient scores on general or NCEXTEND2 Evidence of growth on general or NCEXTEND2 Evidence of growth on general or NCEXTEND2 IEP goals reflect NC Standard Course of Study (Annual Goals and Benchmarks) IEP goals reflect NC Standard Course of Study (Annual Goals and Benchmarks) History of perfect scores on NCEXTEND1 (especially at lower grades) History of perfect scores on NCEXTEND1 (especially at lower grades) No evidence of academic instruction in IEP No evidence of academic instruction in IEP 13
16
On our website… CCS main page, Departments, Testing, Deadlines for Accommodations and Alternate Assessments plus much more…
17
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.