Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnne Fowler Modified over 9 years ago
1
Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) Keith Chan BC CfE
3
RDS of drug users in Recife, Brazil IDU DU
4
www.respondentdrivensampling.org www.respondentdrivensampling.org Douglas Heckathorn, Cornell
5
Obstacles Hard to reach populations Lack of sampling frame Convenience sample Biased estimates Not generalizable
6
RDS hopes Valid identification of population members Population-based estimates Efficient recruitment of hidden populations
7
RDS issues Many assumptions and requirements Many potential biases may not disappear Difficulties in analysis of RDS data Success and failures of RDS worldwide
8
RDS Assumptions 1.Recruits who’s network is members of the target population 2.Network forms one single large component 3.Report network size accurately 4.Recruit randomly from network 5.Sampling with replacement
9
RDS Necessary Data Requirements 1.Personal Network Size 2.Respondent's Serial Number - Serial number of the coupon the respondent was recruited with 3.Respondent's Recruiting Serial Numbers - Serial numbers from the coupons the respondent is given to recruit others
11
Important Coupon Information
12
RDS of drug users in Recife, Brazil IDU Non IDU
13
RDS study of MSM, Kampala, Uganda
14
Markov Process Assumption Memoryless As the recruitment process continues from wave to wave, an equilibrium mix of recruits will eventually be attained This equilibrium mix is independent of the characteristics of the subject from which the recruitment began
15
Equilibrium of education, MSM, Uganda Did not complete high school Completed high school
16
No foreign sex partner Had any foreign sex partner Equilibrium of sex with foreigners, MSM, Uganda
18
Network Size Question Meant to assess the size of the network from which a person could actually recruit within a reasonable time 1.How many other ____ do you know and you will see in the next month? 2.How many other ____ do you know and you will see in the next week?
19
Reciprocal Relationship Assumption
25
Analysis Sample size calculation Crude vs. adjusted Univariate Bivariate Weights Multivariate Netdraw Aggregate analyses Statistical tests Design effect adjustment
31
RDS of drug users in Recife, Brazil IDU seed Never grew. Requested from Brazilia permission to change to all drug users.
32
RDS of drug users in Recife, Brazil IDU DU
33
IDU: Failures Russia Kosovo
34
IDU: Successes USA Indonesia India VietnamMexico Estonia Russia Thailand Nepal MontenegroSerbia Iran
35
Female sex workers: Failures Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, Russia Caribbean Paraguay
36
Female sex workers: Successes Honduras Papua New Guinea India Vietnam
37
MSM: Failures Kosovo Caribbean Albania Estonia Cambodia
38
MSM: Successes Honduras Papua New Guinea Bangladesh Zanzibar Thailand Nepal Croatia Egypt Uganda USA Iran South Africa Brazil
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.