1. Workload Management WP Status and next steps Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova

2. Where we are CMS-HLT use case (Monte Carlo production and reconstruction) analyzed in terms of GRID requirements and GRID tools availability Discussions with Globus team and Condor team Definition of a prototype architecture of workload management system Use of Globus and Condor mechanisms But major developments needed

3. Prototype workload management system architecture Globus GRAM CONDOR Globus GRAM LSF Globus GRAM PBS Site1 Site2Site3 condor_submit (Globus Universe) Condor-G Master Grid Information Service (GIS) Submit jobs Resource Discovery Local Resource Management Systems Globus GRAM as uniform interface to different local resource management systems Condor-G able to provide a reliable/crashproof job submission service Master chooses in which Globus resources the jobs must be submitted Farms Info

4. Where we are Evaluating the existing components (D1.1) and “putting together” the various building blocks Evaluation of Globus Collaboration with WP 1 of INFN-GRID project (Evaluation of the Globus toolkit) http://www.infn.it/globushttp://www.infn.it/globus Evaluation of Globus GRAM GRAM as uniform interface to different underlying resource management systems Evaluation of RSL “Cooperation” between GRAM and GIS Evaluation of Condor-G The current implementation is a prototype It works, but some problems must be solved Globus + Condor-G tested with a real CMS MC production Many many many memory leaks found in the Globus jobmanager !!! Fixes (provided by Francesco Prelz) submitted to Globus team Feedback only for what concerning the bugs in the GAA and GSS modules (new fixes “merged” with the original ones)

5. Layout for CMS production Globus GRAM CONDOR Globus GRAM LSF globusrun Bologna Pisa condor_submit (Globus Universe) Condor-G Submit jobs Local Resource Management Systems Production manager (Ivano Lippi – Padova) Farms Padova

6. First deliverables Month 3: Report on current technology (report) D1.1 Month 6: Definition of architecture for scheduling, resource management, security and job description (report) D1.2 Month 9: Components and documentation for the 1 st release: initial workload management system (prototype) D1.3

7. Proposed work plan Let’s continue the implementation of the proposed prototype Evaluation of current technologies (Globus, Condor) (D1.1) Functionalities for the 1 st release First release We can propose the functionalities that could be implemented “Negotiation” in the ATF To understand if these functionalities “address” the proposed use cases To understand if our module can be “plugged” together with the other “pieces” To understand if the other WPs can provide the required (by WP 1) functionalities

8. Proposed functionalities for the 1 st release First version of job description language (JDL) First version of broker (master), that decides where to submit the jobs Job submission service First version of logging and bookkeeping services First user interface

9. Job Description Language (JDL) Used when the job is submitted, to specify The application The input data set File ? Collection of files ? “Logical” or “physical” names ? Need to be discussed with WP 2, WP 8, ATF Where the output data must be saved (Required and preferable) resources Info for bookkeeping … ??? Prototype: Condor ClassAds

10. Broker/Master Choice of resource (farm) where to submit job Input: JDL expression Output: computing resource choice Published resource access lists (gridmap-files in the Globus-based prototype) are checked as a first step in the resource match-making

11. Broker/Master The “accessible” computing resources are matched with the job request according to: Availability of the requested input data set In the 1 st release the broker will have to choose a resource where this input data set is already available (we are not going to “trigger” the replica of the input data set) Availability of the appropriate application "sandbox“ If necessary, it could be necessary to "copy" and install this sandbox if not already available in the executing farm (“code migration”) (in the 1 st release ???) Queue characteristics and status (architecture, etc…) vs. job requests Let’s start with a few, simple parameters Availability of the requested amount of scratch space

12. Broker/Master We assume that all the information needed by the broker are “published” in one “Grid Information Space” (GIS in the Globus-based prototype) by the other WPs Prototype: Condor matchmaking library Match between the info published in the GIS and the ClassAds defined in the JDL Necessary a “translator” GIS attributes  ClassAds Some work already done by Globus team ???

13. Job submission service Input: job to submit + computing resource choice (provided by broker) Reliable, fault tolerant, crash proof service Reliability in the executing machines up to WP 4 Prototype: Condor-G Submission of jobs to Globus resources (farms) New implementation of Condor-G (+ new Globus job manager) available soon

14. “Code” migration Not easy at all !!! Necessary to “install” in the target farm a complex run time environment Necessary a STRONG collaboration with WP 8 (and WP 4) to define an “application sandbox”, that can easily be installed in one farm, and doesn’t “conflict” with other sandboxes Use of “application repositories” ??? When an application must be installed on one farm, the sandbox is downloaded from such repository

15. Bookkeeping Necessary to “record” for each job Submitting user identity Input data Output data Status of processing Where and when the processing has been done Other bookkeeping info specified in the JDL …???

16. Logging Necessary to keep tracks of the significant events occurred in the system Requests by users Computing resource choice (by broker) Submission to resource …???

17. User Interface Job management Job submission Job removal Job status monitoring Access to bookkeeping info Access to logging info …???