1. PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY Patrizia BalleriniChieti, 06 giugno 2014

2. Presidential Decree 01/02/2010 ANVUR National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Reasearch Institutes art. 2, point 3, states: “The Agency functions as national agency for the quality assurance …”. Self-assesment, assesment and accreditation A.V.A. -System ANVUR Document 28/01/2013 In agreement with ESG Objectives: To promote quality in higher education institutions To give the CofS and the research units comparative elements for quality improvement in their activities To provide MIUR with the necessary information for the development of a national program (insititution /suppression of CofS; funds distribution ) To give the society trusty and clear information about the activities of the university system

3. Ministry Decree n.47/2013Ministry Decree 1059/2013 Adoption of the criteria for Accrediation and Periodic assesment of Institutions and CofS Presidential Decree 01/02/2010 ANVUR National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Reasearch Institutes art. 2, point 3, states: “The Agency functions as national agency for the quality assurance …”. ANVUR Document 28/01/2013 In agreement with ESG Self-assesment, assesment and accreditation A.V.A. -System

4. Self -assesment Accreditation Periodic assesment External Evaluation Internal Evaluation Education Research A.V.A. System System In agreement with ESG: External QA Internal QA

5. European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area(ESG) 1.Policy and procedures for quality assurance 2.Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards 3.Assessment of students 4.Quality assurance of teaching staff 5.Learning resources and student support 6.Information systems 7.Public information THERE IS NO INTENTION THAT THE ESG SHOULD DICTATE PRACTICE OR BE INTERPRETED AS PRESCRIPTIVE OR UNCHANGEABLE. WITH RESPECT OF: AUTONOMY RESPONSABILITY EVALUATION Part 1 (iQA)

6. European Standards and Guidelines (ESG) 1.Policy and procedures for quality assurance 2.Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards 3.Assessment of students 4.Quality assurance of teaching staff 5.Learning resources and student support 6.Information systems 7.Public information ANVUR considers the QA the base of the system of assessment and accreditation of Study Programms guidelines for the QA of SPs; the required documentation (or the ‘documental model’) for the iQA. ‘FIT IN PURPOSE’ (programme learning outcomes meet the needs and expectations of the stakeholders) ‘FIT FOR PURPOSE’ (defines and implements actions suitable for achieving the declared aims)

7. THE GUIDELINES INDICATE WHAT iQA REQUIRES  freedom to define their own iQA system  respect of the ANVUR guidelines  establishment objectives and methods for their achievement and monitoring  autonomy DOCUMENTAL MODEL:  information  data  to be made available

8. The Documentation for the Quality Assurance of Study Programmes (SP) A form named ‘Annual Unique Form’ (SUA-CdS) to be updated yearly by every CofS. SUA-CdS is articulated in Sections, subdivided in the following ‘Areas’: Area A) Education Objectives Area B) Student’s Experiences Area C) Education Results Area D) Organisation the QA public on the web site access with password

9. ANVUR attributes to the re-examination the same meaning as the ISO 9000:2005 norm: a process programmed and scheduled, finalised to assess the fitness, the adequacy and the effectiveness of SPs’ activities, in order to implement all the necessary actions of correction and improvement.

10. The Documentation for the Quality Assurance of Study Programmes (SP) Re-examination Report this process is to be carried out: yearly, in order to adopt all the appropriate actions finalised to the improvement of the CofS management; every 3-5 years, for the re-examination of the CofS objectives and design. Report of the Paritetic Student-Teacher Committee this process is to be carried out: yearly, in order to monitor the quality of the CofS, teaching,human and infrastructural resources, student support services; to individuate specific indicators for the evaluation of the CofS results to express opinion on the activation or closing of a single CofS

11. PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY REQUIREMENT FOR ACCREDITATION OF THE INSTITUTION REQUIREMENT FOR ACCREDITATION OF THE CofS Ministry Decree n.47/2013Ministry Decree 1059/2013 Self-assesment, assesment and accreditation A.V.A. -System ANVUR Document 28/01/2013

12. RESPONSABILITY FOR POLITCS OF QUALITY : HIGH ACADEMIC BODIES RESPONSIBILITY OF ACADEMIC iQA: PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY

13. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR QUALITY IS ON WHO OPERATES EVERY DAY WITHIN THE INSTITUTION AND NOT ON WHO ASSURES IT

14. PQA Academic Bodies:  Dean  Senate  Board of governorns  NdV Schools/Departments CofS Evaluation by NdV Evaluation by CEV (Periodic Accreditation)

15. PQA Academic Bodies:  Dean  Senate  Board of governorns  NdV Schools/Departments CofS Evaluation by NdV Evaluation by CEV (Periodic Accreditation) NOT AN ACADEMIC POLITIC BODY NOT A REPRESENTATIVE ACADEMIC BODY

16. PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY Operative responsibility for the University iQuality Assurance :  Realization of the Politcs of Quality (defined by the High Academic bodies)  Organization and supervision of common instruments (sources, data and forms) useful for the application of and carrying on the Quality Assurance procedures in the Insitution with attention to the ANVUR deadlines  Support for CofS and their Presidents/Coordinators and for the Schools/Departments on the mangement of the flow of information and of documents  Continuous Quality improving  Promotion of Quality culture

17. 17 PQA (Dean Delegate for Quality ) Physical Sciences & Engineering (component) Social Sciences & Humanities (component) Life Sciences (component) University Statute, Art.31bis, Presidium of Quality Dean Decree 29/02/2013 CO.N.P.A.Q Healthcare Area (additional component) Scientific Area (additional component) Social sciences Area (additional component) Humanities Area (additional component)

18.  Support of the CofS for all the activities related to the preparation of A.V.A. documents within the schedule indicated by ANVUR  31.01.2014: drawing up of the first Re-examination Report  15.05.2014: drawing up sections of the SUA-CdS 2014  30.06.2013: drawing up of sections of the SUA-CdS 2014  30.09.2013: drawing up of sections of the SUA-CdS 2014  31.12.2015: drawing up of the Report of the Student-Teachers Paritetic Commettee PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY University Statute, Art.31bis, Presidium of Quality Dean Decree 29/02/2013  Strenght points:  Composition (slim)  Workability  Weakness points and improvement strategies:  Composition (computer system technician)  Communication modes (dedicated- interactive web site)  Contacts with administrative offices and with NdV  Auditing activities

19. OPEN PROBLEMS  OVERALP WITH SOME NdV ACTIVITIES  TOO MANY DOCUMENTS  FORMALISTIC PROCESS  NO RECOGNITION

20. OPEN PROBLEMS  OVERALP WITH SOME NdV ACTIVITIES  TOO MANY DOCUMENTS  FORMALISTIC PROCESS  NO RECOGNITION

21. OPEN PROBLEMS “the proof of the pudding is in the eating”.  OVERALP WITH SOME NdV ACTIVITIES  TOO MANY DOCUMENTS  FORMALISTIC PROCESS  NO RECOGNITION