1. Agriculture Department
Double Digit Growth
Agriculture Department
Mandal : Kondapuram
Year :

2. Kondapuram Mandal Map

3. Kondapuram : Mandal profile
Sl.No
Item
Units
Area in Ha 1
Total Geographical Area ( in Ha) Ha
39393 2
No of Farm Holdings
Nos
10236 3
Forest Area
8823 4
Barren & Uncultivable Land
1652 5
Land Putt to non Agri Uses
2145 6
Culturable Waste
1536 7
Permanent Pastures and Grazing Land
1399 8
Total Cultivable Area (In Ha)
31000 9
No of Revenue Villages 38 10
No of G.P 28 11
Mandal Cropping Pattern a
G.Nut b
Cotton c
Bengalgram d
Sunflower e
Sesamum f
Jowar

4. Agriculture Growth Engines Paddy Bengalgram Cotton Groundnut
Sun flower
Sesamum
Jowar

5. Productivity in Kgs./Ha
3. Normal Areas,Production &Productivity of crops ( for last 2 yrs) &
Mandal: KOndapuram
S.No
Crop
Area in Ha
Productivity in Kgs./Ha
Production in MTs.
GVA in Crs. 1
Paddy
814
4624
3764
6.02
403
5680
2289
3.43 2
Groundnut
806
615
496
2.23
429
671
288
1.3 3
Cotton 16
308 5
0.02
578
448
259
1.1 4
Bengalgram
4920
662
3257
12.38
3140
297
933
3.55
Sesamum
0.00 20
375 8
0.04 6
Maize 32
7045
225
0.33 7
Sunflower
1819
750
1364
5.46
1159
415
481
1.92
Jowar
1196
1560
1866
2.99
1228
850
1044
1.67 9
Other Crops
360
265
1.02
230
160
0.62

6. Productivity in Kgs./Ha
4. Area, Production& Productivity of targets of Growth Engines for (last 2 years data of the same is also required)
Mandal: Kondapuram
SL. NO.
Name of the Crop
Net Increases
Area in Ha
Productivity in Kgs./Ha
Production in MTs.
GVA in Crs. 1
Paddy
403
5680
2289
3.43
848
5750
4876
7.31
445 70
2587
3.88 2
Groundnut
429
671
288
1.3
469
1035
485
2.18 40
364
197
0.88 3
Cotton
578
448
259
1.1
412
750
309
1.25
-166
302 50
0.15 4
Bengalgram
3140
297
933
3.55
3231
760
2456
9.33 91
463
1523
5.78 5
Sesamum 20
375 8
0.04
515 10
0.05
140
0.01 6
Maize
0.00 7
Sunflower
1159
415
481
1.92
951
850
808
3.23
-208
435
327
1.31
Jowar
1228
1044
1.67
1110
1850
2054
3.29
-118
1000
1010
1.62 9
Other Crops
230
160
0.62
360
265
1.02
130
105
0.40

7. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Kondapuram
Crop : Paddy
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area( Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
403
2289
5680
3.43
848
4876
5750
7.31
Net Increase
445
2587 70
3.88
Interventions
Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a) Macro Nutrient Management
b) Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
Farm Yard Manure
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Farm Mechanization
Area of previous year brought under cultivation

8. 2.Integrated Nutrient Management
a) Macro Nutrient Management
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 5, 995 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 7,264 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,269 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.06 crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 1,869 per ha
Application per ha.

9. b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
Area Proposed under Znic Sulphate application 400 ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc Sulphate Rs. 790 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of Zinc Sulphate Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to Zinc Sulphate
application per ha Rs. 1,790
3. Farm Yard Manure application
Area Proposed under FYM application ha
Cost increase per Ha due to application of FYM Rs. 2,000 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of FYM Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Crs.
Net benefit due to FYM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM per Ha Rs. 200

10. 4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs. 1,763 per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs . 2,325 per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 562 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 1,162
5.Farm mechanization
Area Proposed under Farm mechanization ha
Cost reduction per ha due to supply of farm implements i.e.,
rotovator, Transplanter and Harvesters Rs. 2,200 per ha
Cost reduction due to FM implementation on labour Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha due to reduces in harvesting losses 0.4 Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to FM usage Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to FM usage per Ha Rs. 3,000

11. 6. Area of previous year brought under cultivation
Area proposed to be increase ha
Increase in yield per ha Qtls
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs.3.54 crores
Net benefit due to additional area Rs.3.54 crores
Summary
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 2,821 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 4,990 per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

12. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Kondapuram
Crop : Bengalgram
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
3140
933
297
3.55
3231
2456
760
9.33
Net Increase 91
1523
463
5.78
Interventions
Seed replacement
2. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
3. Integrated pest management (IPM)
4. Farm Mechanization
5. Area proposed of previous year brought under cultivation

13. 2.Integrated Nutrient Management Macro Nutrient Management
1.Seed replacement
Area Proposed under Seed Replacement 3,140 ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seed Rs. 500 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy seed Rs Crs.
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase 2,512 Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Seed Replacement Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per ha Rs. ,,300
2.Integrated Nutrient Management
Macro Nutrient Management
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 2,444 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 3,737 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,293 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.41 crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase , Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs.0.44 crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 3,693 per ha
Application per ha.

14. b. Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
Area Proposed under Zinc Sulphate application 174 ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc Sulphate Rs. 790 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of Zinc Sulphate Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to Zinc Sulphate Rs. 2,890
application per ha.
3.Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ,140 ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs. 3,523 per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs . 7,100 per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 3,577 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase 1, Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 4,977

15. 4.Farm mechanization
Area Proposed under Farm mechanization ,140 ha
Cost reduction per ha due to supply of farm implements i.e.,
rotovator, Transplanter and Harvesters Rs. 2,200 per ha
Cost reduction due to FM implementation on labour Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha due to reduces in harvesting losses 0.30 Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to FM usage Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to FM usage per Ha Rs. 3,250
5. Area of previous year brought under cultivation
Area proposed to be increase ha
Increase in yield per ha Qtls
Total yield increase 3,600 Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs.1.26 crores
Net benefit due to additional area Rs.1.26 crores
Summary
Total area proposed 3,231 ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 3,170 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 17,110 per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

16. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Kondapuram
Crop : Cotton
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area( Ha)
Production (MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
578
259
448
1.10
412
309
750
1.25
Net Increase
-166 50
302
0.15
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)

17. 1.Integrated Nutrient Management
a. Macro Nutrient application
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 4,261 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 5,480 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,219 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.04crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 3,244 per ha
Application per ha.
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
Area Proposed under Boron application ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Boron Rs. 135 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of Boron Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Boron application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to Boron Rs. 945
application per ha

18. 3. Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs. 2,000 per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs .3,000 per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 1,000 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 121
Summary
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 2,354 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 4,310 per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

19. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Kondapuram
Crop : Groundnut
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area( Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
429
288
671
1.30
469
485
1035
2.18
Net Increase 40
197
364
0.88
Interventions
Seed replacement
Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a) Macro Nutrient Management
b) Micro Nutrient application (Gypsum)
Farm Yard Manure
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area proposed of previous year brought under cultivation
Area Proposed under Seed Replacement ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seed Rs. 2,700 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy seed Rs Crs.
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Seed Replacement Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per ha Rs. 7,500

20. 2.Integrated Nutrient Management
a) Macro Nutrient Management
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 2, 922 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 4,825 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1903 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.08 crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 4,903 per ha
Application per ha.

21. b. Micro Nutrient application (Gypsum)
Area Proposed under Gypsum application ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Gypsum Rs per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of Gypsum Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Gypsum application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to Gypsum application
per ha Rs. 4,200

22. 3.Farm Yard Manure application
Area Proposed under FYM application ha
Cost increase per Ha due to application of FYM Rs. 2,500 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of FYM Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Crs.
Net benefit due to FYM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM per Ha Rs. 2,300
4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 935 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 3,335

23. 5. Area proposed of previous year brought under cultivation
Area proposed to be increase ha
Increase in yield per ha Qtls
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs crores
Net benefit due to additional area Rs crores
Summary
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 2,840 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 22,238 per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

24. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal: Kondapuram
Crop : Sunflower
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area( Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
1159
481
415
1.92
951
808
850
3.23
Net Increase
-208
327
435
1.31
Interventions
Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
3. Farm Mechanization

25. 1.Integrated Nutrient Management
a. Macro Nutrient application
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 2,271 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 3,535 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,264 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.12crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs.0.42 crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 5,664 per ha
Application per ha.
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
Area Proposed under Boron application 45 ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Boron Rs. 135 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of Boron Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Boron application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to Boron Rs. 4,135
application per ha

26. 2.Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs. 2,050 per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs .3,500 per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 1,450 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 5,450

27. 4.Farm mechanization
Area Proposed under Farm mechanization ha
Cost reduction per ha due to supply of farm implements i.e.,
rotovator, Transplanter and Harvesters Rs. 1,500 per ha
Cost reduction due to FM implementation on labour Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha due to reduces in harvesting losses 0.40 Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to FM usage Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to FM usage per Ha Rs. 2,900
Summary
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 4,349 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 18,149 per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

28. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Kondapuram
Crop : Sesamum
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area( Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores) 20 8
375
0.04 10
515
0.05
Net Increase 2
140
0.01
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)

29. 1.Integrated Nutrient Management
a. Macro Nutrient application
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 2,177 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 2,868 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,117 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.002crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 2,317 per ha
Application per ha.

30. 2.Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs. 1,402 per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs .1,970 per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 568 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 2,488
Summary
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 1,685 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 4,805 per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

31. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal: Kondapuram
Crop : Jowar
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area( Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
1228
1044
850
1.67
1110
2054
1850
3.29
Net Increase
-118
1010
1000
1.62
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
3. Farm Mechanisation

32. 1.Integrated Nutrient Management
a. Macro Nutrient application
Area Proposed under INM ha
NPK as per recommended Rs. 1,749 per ha
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usages Rs 2,705 per ha
Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.956 per ha
Nutrient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application Rs.0.11crores
Yield increase per ha Qtls.
Total yield increase ,330 Qtls
Benefit due to yield increase Rs.0.57 crores
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application Rs crores
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 6,056 per ha
Application per ha.
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
Area Proposed under Zinc Sulphate ha
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc Sulphate Rs. 395 per ha
Total benefit on subsidy of Zinc Sulphate Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to Zinc Sulphate Rs. 4,645
application per ha

33. 2.Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area Proposed under IPM application ha
IPM as per recommended dose Rs per ha
Farmer practice usages Rs .1,380 per ha
Cost reduction due to adopting of IPM Rs. 460 per ha
Total benefit on IPM application Rs crores
Yield increase per Ha Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to IPM application Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha Rs. 5,220
3.Farm mechanization
Area Proposed under Farm mechanization ha
Cost reduction per ha due to supply of farm implements i.e.,
rotovator, Transplanter and Harvesters Rs. 1,500 per ha
Cost reduction due to FM implementation on labour Rs Crs.
Yield increase per Ha due to reduces in harvesting losses 0.30 Qtls.
Total Yield Increase Qtls.
Benefit due to Yield increase Rs Crs.
Net benefit due to FM usage Rs Crs.
Net benefit to the farmer due to FM usage per Ha Rs. 2,550

34. Summary
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions Rs. 3,311 per ha
Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs per ha
Total value increase Rs Crs

35. Remedy to address the problem
Soil Condition
S.No
Problem
Remedy to address the problem 1
Low Organic carbon content in the soil
Raising of legume crops(PULSES) for nitrogen fixation in soil and application of soil amendments like castor cake ,Neem seed kernal extract etc 2
Low nitrogen content in soil
Split application of nitrogenous fertilisers as basal and top dressing and Prevention of nitrogen losses by using neem coated urea 3
Increase in phosphates (P2O5) content in soil
Recommendation of increased use of organic fertiliser and application of phosphorus solubilising bio fertilisers in soil 4
Increase in PH OF SOIL i.e>8.7
Application of Gypsum at an average of 500 kg /acre 5
Decerese in PH i.e <4.00
Application of lime at an average of 600 to 1200 Kg/acre 6
Micronutrient deficiency for zinc and iron elements
Application of the respective Micronutrient fertiliser 7
Increase in Electrical conductivity
Managing drainage problem in irrigation and leaching of excess salts in soil

36. 5.Soil Health Profile based on soil test results conducted during 2015.
Sl. No.
Component
Target
No.of soil samples collected by MAOs
No.of Soil Sample received to Lab
No.of Soil Sample analysed
Soil Health Cards online
Soil Health Cards distributed 1
Macro
980
720
718
217 2
Micro
490
S.No
Particulars
Status 1
Ogranic Carbon
Low
Zinc
87% deficient 2
Nitrogen
Boran
40 % deficient 3
Phosphorous
Medium
Iron
90% deficient 4
Potash
High
Sulphar
27 % deficient

37. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils apply
of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of
recommendations
Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase efficiency of
Nitrogen
As per the analysis reports received Micronutrient
deficiencies observed as detailed Zinc- 87% deficiency,
Iron- 90% deficiency, Sulphure- 27% deficiency, Boron-
40% deficiency.
To correct Micronutrient deficiencies, the following
Micronutrients proposed to Supply by Department of
Agriculture as follows
Zinc targeted area proposed is 574 ha, allotted
10.0mts
Boron targeted area proposed is 245 ha, allotted
0.92mts
Gypsum targeted area proposed is 620 ha, allotted 114
MTs

38. 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
I Additional Areas:-
Additional Areas under irrigation provided by Irrigation department.:- nil
Areas crop wise targeted by Department of Agriculture:-
Areas crop wise brought under diversification and previous area brought
under cultivation detailed below.
Crop
Paddy
Maize
Bengal gram
Cotton
Ground nut
Sunflower
Sesamum
Jower
Others
Total
Area in ha
445 91 40
130
706

39. 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
B) Varietal Replacement plan targeted for :-
Crop
Paddy
Remarks
Bengal gram
Name of Variety
NBG-3
Seed availability is the major constrain
No. of ha’s proposed
1000
Qty of Seed required in qtls

40. III Soil Health Management
A. Fertilizer requirement as per Normal Areas for last 2 years.
Sno
Year
Mandal Normal area
Urea
DAP
NPK
Other
Total 1
12145
526
120
399 30
1075 2
10924
516 98
308 47
969
B.Actual chemical fertilizer consumed for last 2 years.
Sno
Year
Mandal Normal area
Urea
DAP
NPK
Other
Total
Remarks 1
12145
526
120
399 30
1075
Fertilizer Consumption assumed based on the Fertilizer sales at Mandal level

41. C.As per the targeted area, fertilizer requirement for 2015-16
(as per the soil test based recommendations).
Sno
Year
Mandal Normal area
Urea
DAP
MOP
NPK
SSP
Total 1
12145
840
450
200
850 50
2390

42. Allocation of Micro Nutrients for the year 2015-16 Sl. No
Name of the Division
Name of the Mandal
Gypsum 42% deficiency
Kharif-15
Rabi-15-16
Area in Ha
Target
Positioned
Distributed 1
Muddanur
Kondapuram
620
114 21 2
125 60
Sl. No
Name of the Division
Name of the Mandal
Boron
Boron 40% Deficiency
Total Target
Kharif-15
Rabi-15-16
Basal
Foliar
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed 1
Muddanur
Kondapuram
245
0.920
0.25
184
0.75 49
0.15 6
0.010
Sl. No
Name of the Division
Name of the Mandal
Zinc Sulphate 65% deficiancy
Total
Kharif-15
Rabi-15-16
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
Basal
Foliar 12% 1
Muddanur
Kondapuram
574 10
459 8 14
0.25 86

43. D.Saving of fertilizer by following soil test based recommendations.
. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils.
. Apply of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of Recommendations.
. Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase of efficiency
E.Micro nutrient deficiency in Normal areas and targets of Micro nutrient supply during
.As per the analysis reports received Micronutrient deficiencies observed as detailed Zinc- 87% deficiency, Iron- 90% deficiency, Sulphure- 27% deficiency, Boron-40% deficiency.
To correct Micronutrient deficiencies, the following Micronutrients proposed to Supply by Department of Agriculture as follows
Zinc targeted area proposed is 574 ha, allotted 10.0mts
Boron targeted area proposed is 245 ha, allotted 0.92mts
Gypsum targeted area proposed is 745 ha, allotted 174 mts
F. Problematic soils like Saline, Alkaline, salt etc. and areas and measures taken for reclamation (quantify Nil).

44. IV Good Agricultural Practices
Detailed good agronomical practices to be adopted crop wise.
Paddy: Seed Treatment with Carbendazim-1g/kg seed
. Basal application of Zinc 50kgs /ha
. Drain out the Field at Tillering stage for increasing productive Tillers
. Making of allies for every 2mts in East-West direction
split applications of Fertilizer
. Line sowing/ Drum seeding Method
. Mechanized Harvesting
Cotton:- .Seed treatment with Imidacloprid -48%- 7gms/kg
.Basal application of Zinc-50kg/ha, Boron-2.5kg/ha, Magnesium-
10kg/ha
Application of Fertilizer within 90DAS
.Stem application method within 60DAS
. Inter cropping with Redgram crop
. To reduce pesticide consumption sowing of Non-Bt cotton.

45. IV Good Agricultural Practices
3.Bengal gram:- .Seed treatment with T.viridae-8-10g/kg of Seed./
Hexaconazole-2ml/kg of seed
. Inter cropping with ratio
Highlight locally adopted best agronomical practices and
indigenously developed practices.:- Nil
Crop sequence:- 1. Paddy- Groundnut, 2.Paddy-Sesamum, 3.Paddy-Pulses(Green gram or Black gram)
Crop rotation:- 1. Cotton-Bengal gram
2. Bengal gram- Coriander
Double cropping 1. Paddy-Paddy 2.Paddy- Pulses
Inter cropping:- 1.Cotton-Redgram

46. V Cost Reduction
Strategies and techniques followed to reduce cost of cultivation.
Chemical fertilizer applications (Nitrogen ):- By application of Green manure seed, improves the Fertilizer efficiency, there by reduces the Application of Nitrogenous Fertilizers up to 30%.
Without green manures applies 375kgs/ha, With green manure applies 250kgs/ha.
Pest management.:- Application of Neem oil 3000ppm reduces the Pest infestation.
Promotion of organic pesticides, fertilizers and other botanicals.:- Seed treatment with Pseudomonas, Application of PSB 10kgs/ha,
Application of Weedicide:- Application of Weedicides as pre-emergence and Post-emergence will reduces cost.

47. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Polam pilusthondhi- schedule detailed information required
ChandrannaRythukshetralu
Sl. No.
Mandal
Date
Village visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon
2.00PM to 5.30PM 1 2 3 4 5
Kondapuram
Venkayyakalva,lavanur
Pottipadu,S.Thimmapuram
P.Thimmapuram,Kondapuram,Muchumarri,Choutipalli
Obannapeta,K.bommepalli
Nederapeta,Dathapuram,Thallproddutur,Regadipalli
Bukkapatnam,Yetur
K.Ramireddypalli,Burujupalli,B.kottalapalli,Beduduru
Konavaripalli,Yanamalachinthala 6
Chamaluru,Yarragudi,T.koduru,Dobbudupalli
K.Sugumanchupalli,Sankepalli 7
Lavanuru
Chennamanenipalli 8
Venkaiahkalva
Pottipadu 9
P.Ananthpuram
Penjuvvi 10
S.Thimmapuram
Donkupalli 11
Gandluru
Chavitipalli 12
Obannapeta 13
Burujupalli
venkatapuram

48. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Sl. No.
Mandal
Date
Village visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon
2.00PM to 5.30PM 1 2 3 4 5 14
Kondapuram
Regadipalli
Brahmanapalli 15
Konavaripalli
Yanamalachinthala 16
Yeturu
Beduduru 17
T.Proddatur
Sugumanchipalli 18
Yarragudi
Chamaluru 19
Sankepalli
T.Koduru 20
Murugampalli
Koppolu 21
Lavanuru
Chennamanenipalli 22
Venkaiahkalva
Pottipadu 23
P.Ananthpuram
Penjuvvi 24
S.Thimmapuram
Donkupalli 25
Gandluru
Chavitipalli 26
Obannapeta

49. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Sl. No.
Mandal
Date
Village visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon
2.00PM to 5.30PM 1 2 3 4 5 27
Kondapuram
Burujupalli
venkatapuram 28
Regadipalli
Brahmanapalli 29
Konavaripalli
Yanamalachinthala 30
Yeturu
Beduduru 31
T.Proddatur
Sugumanchipalli 32
Yarragudi
Chamaluru 33
Sankepalli
T.Koduru 34
Murugampalli
Koppolu 35
Lavanuru
Chennamanenipalli 36
Venkaiahkalva
Pottipadu 37
P.Ananthpuram
Penjuvvi 38
S.Thimmapuram
Donkupalli 39
Gandluru
Chavitipalli

50. Statement showing the details of CRKs proposals in kondapuram for the Year 2015-16
Sno
Name of Mandal
Village
Crop
Season
Organized by
Name
Cadre 1
Kondapuram
Chennamaneni Palli
Bengalgram
Rabi
U.Nagabhushan Reddy
MAO 3
K.Venkatapuram
C.Ramesh
AEO 4
Eturu
Paddy
Kharif

51. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Special awareness programs and trainings conducted to MPEOs and Farmers in highlighting cost reduction and promotion of Natural Farming.:- Trainings organized on Organic Farming in Co-ordination with Scientists from KVK, ARS, DAATT center.
Identification of Best Adoptive Farmers as Master Trainers.:-
Involvement RMGs, SHGs, NGOs & other Organisations.
Exposure of farmers to CMSA villages.

52. Farm Mechanisation Farm machinery- item wise required to cover 100%.:-
Rotavators-10no.s, Tractor drawn implements.38, Plant protection equipments – 50 , Diesel Engines-15,Power Tillers-5,Mini Tractors-1,Tarpalins (HDPE)-145,Tarpalins (MCL)-22 CHC(Cotton)-5no.Combined Harvester-1.
Action plan for supply of farm machinery as per allocation :- Planned In JBMV program and collected implement wise Farmer details. After allotment details intimated to the Farmers.
Cost reduction through farm mechanization .:- Cost is reduced by application of Rotavator up to Rs. 2000/ha, By application of Mechanized harvesting it reduces up to Rs.2200/ha. Use threshing Machinery reduces cost upto Rs.2500/ha.
Enhancement of yields through farm mechanization:- Nil

53. Tractor Drawn Implements 38 3.79 2 Rotavators 5 2.6 3
Statement showing the Mandal wise component wise category wisebudget allocation Under NSP during Kondapuram Mandal.
S.No
Mandal
Name of the implement
Phy
Fin
Remarks 1
Kondapuram
Tractor Drawn Implements 38
3.79 2
Rotavators 5
2.6 3
Plant protection equipment 35
1.5 4
Diesel engines
0.55
Power Tiller
0.75 6
Mini Tractors
0.84 7
Tarpalins(HDPE)
145
1.92 8
Trapalins(MCL) 22
0.29

54. VIII. IT – Applications
Enrolment of farmers to M-Kissan portal.:- 1. This fastens the advising of the Farmers. 2.This creates awareness on Modern practices 3.
All beneficiary farmers of all schemes of department to be enrolled in M- Kissan.:- 1.This is useful to get the details of Farmers who availed schemes previously 2. This prevents repetition, there by more Farmers availing Scheme benefits.

55. Conclusion:
The Kondapuram mandal people are mainly depending on Agriculture and majority of the farmers are big and marginal farmers. They cultivating Groundnut & Bengalgram as major rain fed crop for their Livelyhood and also growing paddy, Cotton as a major crops in Kharif.
The soils also having poor organic carbon, low Nitrogen, P2O5 medium and having High K2O and also deficient in micro nutrients such as Zinc. Advocating of farmers through Department personnel adopting Neam Coated Urea and Straight Fertilizers to improve Fertilizere use Efficiency and micronutrients application in all the crops to correct the deficiencies. Farmers are advising to raise Green Manuring crops in all the cultivating areas before raising crop to increase organic carbon in soil.

56. Conclusion:
The extension staff of the mandal are extensively giving wide publicity though trainings and distributing Phamplets to create awareness to all the farmers on Soil sampling and advantages of soil sampling, duly adopting the Soil test based fertilizer application for all the crops.
The rural poor living standards and economical standards there is a need of technology transfer to the farmer by giving trainings, exposure visits, conducting Demos with increases the capacity building of the individual farmer will increases the confidence Leeds to adopt new practices in future for getting better results. Promoting farm mechanization, organic farming, and application of Bio agents reduce the cost of cultivation and maintains the ecology.
Due to above efforts of the Department the cost benefit ratio of farming community in the mandal has been increased which results in successful achievement of double digit growth for the year