1. Ref : STIF rev PDU – Prepa comité des partenaires 090518 V1.1 DOCUMENT DE TRAVAIL Urban Mobility Plan in Ile de France EMTA General meeting 27th april 2009

2. Urban mobility plans : a legal requirement  1996 : law on ‘Air quality and rational use of energy’  All urban areas of more than 100,000 inhabitants must elaborate an urban mobility plan (Plan de déplacement urbain - PDU)  Main objectives of these plans:  Reducing motorized traffic  Developing public transport and all other modes of transport which are environmentally friendly  Adapting main roads network in order to enhance its efficiency and its use by all modes of transport  Organizing public parking provision  Organizing freight transport and goods delivery in order to reduce impact on road traffic and environment  Promoting staff’s mobility management for companies and public administrations  Public transport authorities are in charge of the elaboration of the plan  The Plans must be evaluated within 5 years  Revision if necessary

3. The Urban Mobility Plan in Ile-de-France  The law makes an exception for the Franch Region ‘Ile de France’: the plan applies to the whole region  The first plan was designed by the State  together with the regional council, STIF, the city of Paris  in association with other local authorities, transport operators, interest groups  Adopted at the end of 2000 after a public consultation  Since the French ‘Décentralisation’ law (2004) : STIF is responsible for the evaluation and the revision of the Plan on behalf of the regional council  The plan is eventually approved by the regional council and requires the agreement of the national state

4. The governance of the 2000 Mobility Plan : its main weaknesses  After 6 years of implementation  Only a few of the planned actions have been achieved  Some projects have been stopped because of the disruption in state financing  Consultative process takes much more time than expected  The Plan was elaborated at the regional level but many of its provisions are to be implemented at the local level  Difficulty of appropriation by French territorial communities  Problem of coordination between different levels of French territorial communities

5. Sharing out of responsibilities  Different actors are responsible for planning, at different levels:  State, Region, Département, Built-up (metropolitan) Area, Town  Plans are linked to legal compatibility requirements StateDépartementsRegionMunicipalities Public transportRoadsDelivery of goodsPublic parking STIF

6. Revision of the Regional Urban Mobility Plan: a development and consultative process aiming at making the keyplayers involved  A consultation at all levels:  those who will approve the plan  those who will have their say about the plan  those who will implement it  people at large  An involvement of the elected representatives in the process Thematic Partners Committee Public Transport Thematic Partners Committee Individual motorized modes Thematic Partners Committee Alternative modes of transport Thematic Partners Committee Goods Technical experts groups Political management STIF’s Transport Supply Committee Partners Committee Technical management Technical Committee STIF, RIF, Départements, State

7. Ref : STIF rev PDU – Prepa comité des partenaires 090518 V1.1 DOCUMENT DE TRAVAIL The consultative process from May 2009 until March 2010 Partner’s comity Seminar - Diagnosis Meeting of the associations Partner’s comity Seminar Stakes and consultation Preparation May to July Contributions Sept. / Oct. Free contributions Internet Appealed contributions Towns and PDU partners Accompanied contributions : youth, districts, 2-wheel motorized vehicles, car and peri-urban workshops Debates Nov. / Dec. Départements seminar Day of the towns and local governments 4 seminars Productive systems Synthesis Jan. / March Partner’s comity Seminar Synthesis of the consultation White Paper about the consultation Tools for debate Power point diagnosis Doc. Diagnosis and stakes (1st version) Questionnaire adapted to the context Doc. Diagnosis and stakes (1st version) + avenues of action + synthesis of the contributions Completion of the PDU project Forum

8. Révision of the urban mobility plan: a technical elaboration process to identify pertinent actions  Thematic work groups Which mobility by 2020 ? Public Transport: Provision of transportation services Public Transport: intermodality Fare scheme Multimodal passengers information Car and two-wheel motorized vehicles parking Operating of the road networks Road safety Pedestrians, cycling and sharing of the public space Living and mobility areas Link between urban planning and transport Mobility of the people with disabilities Mobility management Taxis and on demand transport Transport and delivery of goods Financal needs, new modes of financing, urban toll Environment Governance, local implementation, Local Mobility Plans

9. 9 The stake of the Regional Urban Mobility Plan (RUMP) Ensuring the mobility needs of people and goods:  According to the different scales of mobility  For various motives  For all  Reducing environmental nuisances (pollution, greenhouse gases, noise)  Improving road safety  Improving the quality of life  Controlling energy consumption and reducing the dependence on fossil fuels MOBILITY ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE In order to ensure this balance today and moreover in the future, we have to:  Change the mobility conditions  Change our behaviour The stake of the RUMP is to ensure a sustainable balance between the needs of mobility, the protection of environment and health and the financial needs. This balance shall facilitate the attractiveness of the French region ‘Ile-de-France’ and guarantee the social cohesion. Ensuring the financial sustainability  Identifying the sources of financing for all the actions of the Regional Urban Mobility Plan (RUMP) whatever the scope  Looking for efficient measures FINANCING Sustainable balance

10. 10 1 Acting on the urban forms and urban development 2 Making public transport more attractive 3 Restoring walking as a major item in the mobility chain 4 Giving a new lease of life to cycling 8 Convincing the key players and stimulating the will to act together 9 Arousing citizens awareness 5 Acting on the conditions of use of the individual motorized modes of transport Changing the mobility conditions Changing our behaviour Those changes have to feed each other in order to take up the challenge of the RUMP The challenges of the RUMP to reduce road traffic and promote alternative modes of transport Making the whole mobility chain accessible 6 Rationalizing the organisation of the goods flow and encouraging the modal transfer 7