Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLandon Williamson Modified over 11 years ago
1
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
2
Project 199106100 SWANSON LAKES WILDLIFE AREA (SLWA)
3
Project 25001 Acquire Sharp-tailed Grouse Habitat at the SLWA
5
PROJECT LAND OWNERSHIP
6
SLWA Cover Types Cover TypeAcres Shrub-steppe14,676 Ephemeral pond98 Lacustrine132 Wetland83 Wet meadow1,754 Riparian Shrub35 Conifer1 Cliff/Talus485 Agriculture275 Conservation Reserve (CRP)2,396 Farmstead65 TOTAL20,000
7
Shrubsteppe
8
More Shrubsteppe
9
Yep, Looks Like Grass to Me!
10
A little more to the left Ive got hay fever!
11
Wet Meadow/Vernal Pool
12
Riparian Shrub - Deciduous Forest If you think Im going in there..
13
Wetlands
14
Lacustrine
15
In Contrast……….
16
Sharp-tailed Grouse Acquisition Cover Types
17
…and other shrubsteppe obligate species
18
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 18,000 shrubs/trees planted
19
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 243 ha of agricultural land converted to native-like grassland
20
Grass/Shrub Plantings
22
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 16 ha Food Plots
23
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 93 km of Fence
24
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS MONITORING & EVALUATION HEP/VEGETATION BASELINE TRANSECTS - 1992 CONDUCTED WILDLIFE SURVEYS
25
MONITORING & EVALUATION Replicated HEP transects-2000 Established vegetation transects using M&E protocols Monitored sharp-tailed grouse leks and neo-tropical birds etc. Grassland fertilizer trials
26
M&E RESULTS – VOR Null hypothesis (H o ): VOR measurements observed in 1992 and 2000 are equal Alternative hypothesis 1 (H A1 ): VOR measurements observed in 1992 are greater than VOR measurements recorded in 2000; Alternate hypothesis 2 (H A2 ): VOR measurements observed in 1992 are less than VOR measurements recorded in 2000.
27
Grassland VOR Results Example No Disturbance Disturbed
29
19922000 VOR
30
TSSTSS SHRUBLAND VOR RESULTS vn1vn1 VN1-TSS (not disturbed) NE1-TSS (disturbed ) TR1-TSS ( not disturbed ) 1992 2000 S71-USS 1992 2000 High Power Low Power
31
RANGE FERTILIZER TRIALS
32
WILDLIFE MONITORING Shrubsteppe Bird Surveys Hunter Harvest Surveys Waterfowl Surveys Deer Surveys Sage Grouse Surveys
33
REGIONAL & SUB-BASIN GOALS
34
FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS 1. INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARP- TAILED GROUSE TO 400 BY 2010. Augment existing population Monitor and control recreational use of project lands.
35
FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS 2. Implement the SLWA Management Plan. Control introduced vegetation Maintain shrub and tree enhancements Maintain boundary fence Construct new fence as needed Maintain equipment/infrastructure etc. Maintain sharp-tailed and sage grouse nesting habitat.
36
FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS -Monitor leks -Search for new leks -Conduct sharp-tailed grouse nesting and brood rearing surveys 3. Conduct sharp-tailed grouse research….in conjunction with WDFW statewide efforts.
37
FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS 4. Monitor wildlife and habitat response to protection, enhancement, and maintenance measures annually. Conduct HEP and vegetation transects and establish photo points. Monitor big game, sage grouse, waterfowl, and neo-tropical birds populations/hunter harvest.
38
SUB-BASIN NEEDS AND LIMITING FACTORS The Swanson Lakes Wildlife Area and the Sharp-tailed Grouse Habitat Acquisition proposals address the following major sub-basin needs and limiting factors: 1. Declining shrubsteppe habitat quality and quantity and subsequent impacts on obligate species. 2. Shrubsteppe habitat fragmentation 3. Loss of deep soils plant communities. 4. Alteration of the plant community due to weeds, grazing, and wildfire.
39
IN CLOSING………. SWANSON LAKES WILDLIFE AREA Project 199106100 Acquire Sharp-tailed Grouse Habitat at the SLWA Project 25001
40
REQUESTED FUNDING Swanson Lakes WA 2002: $296,238 2003: $290,137 2004: $265,137 SHGR Acquisition 2002: $237,053 2003: $32,900 2004: $5,000
41
THANK YOU
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.