1. Next steps on capacity Doug Wood NW-GRI SG, Paris, 9 June 2009

2. 2 Disclaimer The contents of this presentation have been provided to you for informational purposes only. This information is not advice on or a recommendation of any of the matters described herein or any related commercial transactions, whether they consist of physical sale or purchase agreements, financing structures (including, but not limited to senior debt, subordinated debt and equity, production payments and producer loans), investments, financial instruments, hedging strategies or any combination of such matters and no information contained in this presentation constitutes an offer or solicitation by or on behalf of BP p.l.c. or any of its subsidiaries (collectively "BP") to enter into any contractual arrangement relating to such matters. BP makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, reasonableness or completeness of the information, assumptions or analysis contained herein or in any supplemental materials, and BP accepts no liability in connection therewith. BP deals and trades in energy related products and may have positions consistent with or different from those implied or suggested by this presentation. This presentation may also contain forward-looking statements. Any statements that are not historical facts, including statements about BP's beliefs or expectations, or those of its employees, are forward- looking statements. These statements are based on plans, estimates and projections and you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is forecast, suggested or implied in any forward-looking statements in this presentation due to a variety of factors. Factors which could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, general economic conditions; conditions in the markets in which BP is engaged; behavior of customers, suppliers, and competitors; technological developments; the implementation and execution of new processes; and changes to legal, tax, and regulatory rules. In addition, financial risks such as currency movements, interest rate fluctuations, liquidity, and credit risks could influence future results. The foregoing list of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. BP disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly or privately update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

3. 3 So what about capacity? Firm capacity over a reasonable time period (or range of time periods) is the aim. Monthly and up to 2 – 5 years is ideal. Day ahead firm is still useful in addition to medium-term capacity, not as a substitute for it. Interruptible capacity is better than no capacity, but not really satisfactory −Capacity that has a high risk of interruption and/or can be interrupted for unpredictable reasons carries the highest risk. −The further ahead we can predict interruptions, the more useful it is. −Interruptible can still increase efficient utilisation of pipeline, which should bring advantages to owners and users.

4. 4 Capacity ideas Medium term capacity products −Market needs medium term products (say 3-5 years) to complement existing products of Day Ahead and 10 year open season commitments −TSOs may therefore need to build new capacity that is not fully underwritten, with the remaining risks either to borne by the TSO (perhaps in return for a higher rate of return) or socialised in the rate base (but not both!). Conditional capacities −Capacity could be sold (either by the TSO or by the main primary capacity holder) that can be withdrawn/interrupted under defined, verifiable conditions. −Where a supplier of last resort must hold capacity in order to meet public service obligations to supply in a 1 in 20 /1 in 50 winter, then capacity could be sold to others on the basis that if temperature fell below a particular level or demand exceeded a particular level, then it would be withdrawn. They key is it would not be withdrawn under any other circumstances. Capacity release −Merger / competition remedy −Incentives on primary capacity holders – renomination restrictions and “release or pay”? But must investigate how to apply to cross border capacities, impact on legacy arrangements, revenue sharing, impact on balancing tools and within-day markets. Incentives on TSOs and on primary rights holders must be considered Common carriage Capacity buyback

5. 5 What have we learned? Past workgroups have been instructive −Improved understanding of each others problems and objectives −Experience of refining objectives to what can be delivered. −Uncovering of legal issues −Different standards of delivery, different expectations −Don’t need to work at speed of slowest player But −Very labour intensive for small gain −Need to work smarter to deliver more with fewer meetings, less travel −Many potential low-level solutions; delivery is more important than long debates about relative merits. −Authorities need to find flexible ways to reward TSOs for doing the right thing

6. 6 Next steps Continue to build on past successes (extension of day-ahead capacity pilot to Ellund and elsewhere, increase functionality of pilot). Look for opportunities to resolve legal bottlenecks when the time is right. Network users to define new ideas on capacity services, work with TSOs, regulators, other interested parties to produce workable solutions. Coordinate meetings to reduce travel time and costs, but don’t restructure the projects.

7. 7 End