Download presentation
1
GASTROPARESIS September 12, 2015 SGNA
2
GASTROPARESIS Definition: a disorder in which patients exhibit signs and symptoms of delayed gastric emptying without an anatomic cause (obstructing ulcer, inflammatory stenosis, malignancy)
3
Causes of Gastroparesis
Systemic disorder: diabetes mellitus, muscular dystrophy, amyloidosis, scleroderma Idiopathic: post-viral Post-surgical: vagotomy, fundoplication
4
Symptoms of Gastroparesis
Nausea Vomiting Abdominal pain Early satiety Heartburn Dysphagia
11
CASE NM-1 30 YO female transferred to UH with nausea/vomiting
“Flu” symptoms 4 mo prior Hospitalized 2x in Ft Wayne:GB US, Abd CT, HIDA, EGD all negative Serology: mono, hep B, ANA: negative Enteroclysis: “mucosal thickening in jejunum”
12
CASE NM- 2 Exploratory lap: neg; feeding J tube, appy
Small intestinal Bx: neg Transfer to UH PMH: facial herpes zoster 2 yr PTA Physical Exam: normal; normal liver and spleen
13
CASE NM-3 Lab: ALT 139, AST 36, GGTP 99 CMV (IgM) Pos 1:80 titer
GE scan: borderline slow gastric emptying ID consult: transient viral illness
14
CASE NM-4 Small intestinal manometry: abnormal MMC
EGG: abnormal: no increase in post-prandial 3 cpm activity EGD: normal Histology: acute/chronic inflammation Antral Bx viral culture: CMV
15
Case NM-5 Patient eating, discharged home; N/V return
Treatment with E-mycin, Reglan ineffective EGD (6 mo after onset of Sx): NL; antral Bx culture: CMV 9 mo after onset of Sx: Rx with leuprolide
16
CASE NM- 6 Good response to leuprolide: eating well, no N/V
MONTH 13: leuprolide stopped Month 17: hosp at IU with N/V, abd pain; surgical J tube, decompression g tube MONTH 30: Mayo Clinic: delayed gastric emptying, delayed colon transit Transient response to cisapride
17
CASE NM- 7 Hosp IUMC with abdominal pain; colonoscopy shows ulcers: Bx pos CMV culture Rx with gancyclovir: colon ulcers heal, pain improves, vomiting and tube feeding continue Rx with domperidone: no response Rx with leuprolide: no improvement
18
CASE NM-8 Gastric pacemaker implanted 8 yr after onset of Sx. Patient does well over next two years; J tube and G tube removed two years later. Patient require high current output from pacemaker and requires replacement every two years.
19
FACTORS REGULATING GI MOTILITY
Intrinsic properties of visceral smooth muscle Intrinsic and extrinsic nervous system Gastrointestinal hormones
20
MOTOR FUNCTIONS OF THE STOMACH
Accomodation Mixing Emptying Sensation
21
ASSESSMENT OF GASTRIC EMPTYING
Nuclear scan Endoscopy Ultrasound “SMART” pill
23
PROBLEMS WITH NUCLEAR SCINTIGRAPHY
Need standardized meal Liquids empty faster than solids Proteins and carbohydrates empty faster than fats Digestible solids empty faster than digestible solids
44
ASSESSMENT OF GASTRIC ACCOMODATION
SPECT scan Barostat
45
ASSESSMENT OF GASTRIC SENSATION
Satiety test
46
TREATMENT OF GASTROPARESIS
Diet: low fat, low residue; supplements Medications: avoid anticholinergics, narcotics Promotility agents Antiemetics GJ tube feeding TPN Gastric electrical stimulation
47
PROMOTILITY AGENTS Reglan: FDA advisory: 3 months
E-mycin: suspension expensive Domperidone: not FDA approved, insurance coverage Cisapride: drug interaction
48
ANTIEMETICS Phenergan: tablets, suspension, suppository, cream
Zofran/Kytril: ODT, pill, patch Marinol Benadryl Scopolamine Ginger Acupuncture
49
TUBE FEEDING Radiologic GJ tube Endoscopic GJ tube Surgical J tube
Venting gastrostomy optional Temporary: gastric function may return after several months of enteral nutrition
50
TPN Temporary measure Enteral feeding effective in most patients
Infection Thrombosis
52
GASTRIC ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
How does it work? Effective for nausea and vomiting Does not “pace” stomach May, or may not, accelerate gastric emptying Lag phase: may take 6 months to work
53
GES SURGERY Laparoscopy Risk of infection Electrode migration
Warning: No MRI FDA approved: not experimental Insurance issues
54
RATIONALE FOR GASTRIC ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
Cardiac pacing effective for some dysrhythmic disorders Stomach also has a “pacemaker” rhythm Gastric “dysrhythmias” identified Smooth muscle “pacemakers” identified in small intestine, colon, ureter, bladder, uterus
55
Background ECA: electrical control activity; 3 cpm in humans, 5 cpm in dogs ERA: electrical response activity, ie gastric contractions GES entrains electrical activity in man and dogs Unclear whether GES can generate muscular contractions
59
Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2003; 125: Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis THOMAS ABELL, RICHARD McCALLUM, MICHAEL HOCKING, KENNETH KOCH, HASSE ABRAHAMSSON, ISABELLE LEBLANC, GREGER LINDBERG, JAN KONTUREK, THOMAS NOWAK, EAMMON M. M. QUIGLEY, GERVAIS TOUGAS, AND WARREN STARKEBAUM. University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi; University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas; University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; University of Goteborg, Sweden; Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Elbe Kliniken Stade, Stade, Germany; St.Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana; National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Medtronic, Inc., Minneapois, Minnesota.
62
EFFICACY OF GES Diabetic gastroparesis: 80-90% Idiopathic: 70%
Postoperative: 60%
66
Thomas V. Nowak1, Gary Hutchins2, Lyn Ring1 and Kativa Leal1
EFFECT OF GASTRIC STIMULATION ON CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW IN PATIENTS WITH GASTROPARESIS Thomas V. Nowak1, Gary Hutchins2, Joel Hammond1, Yang Wang2, Lyn Ring1 and Kativa Leal1 1Department of Medicine, St.Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA and 2 Department of Radiology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
67
PURPOSE To determine whether GES produces changes in regional cerebral blood flow using positron emission tomography (PET).
72
CONCLUSIONS Gastric electrical stimulation of the stomach in gastroparetic patients produces significant alterations in cerebral blood flow. Gastric electrical stimulation both increases and decreases blood flow to respective regions of the brain. Central nervous system mechanisms during gastric electrical stimulation may be responsible for the relief of nausea and vomiting in these patients.
73
GES: Issues Remain Mechanism: How does it work?
Which patients are best candidates for GES? Optimal stimulus parameters How to monitor treatment Electrode placement: serosa, mucosa, fundus, vagus nerve? What about symptomatic patients with normal or fast gastric emptying?
74
GES Collaboration IU Gastroenterology/Hepatology Purdue Biomedical/Electrical Engineering
VNS approved since 1997 for drug-resistant epilepsy (2005 for drug-resistant MDD). 19 Aug 2013
76
Experimental Setup Record VN Response Record SM Response [1] [1]
[2] [1] Diaphragm Record VN Response Stimulate Antrum Record SM Response [1] [1] M.P. Ward et al. (In preparation ). “A flexible closed-loop platform for rapid biofeedback control and personalization of electroceutical therapies.” [2] Richard M. Peek, Jr & Martin J. Blaser. (2002). “Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas.” Nature Reviews Cancer 2, pp
78
Cutaneous Recordings of Vagal Afferents
79
Current and Future Directions
Finalize research objectives and submit proposals for funding Biomarker discovery Directly measure and characterize smooth muscle response Multi-electrode recordings (ECoG electrodes) fMRI studies Purdue: Rodents IUSM: GES patients Investigate VNS as an alternative to GES
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.