Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2-levels Access control for HTTP binding Group Name: WG4 (& WG2/WG3 for information) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2-levels Access control for HTTP binding Group Name: WG4 (& WG2/WG3 for information) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting."— Presentation transcript:

1 2-levels Access control for HTTP binding Group Name: WG4 (& WG2/WG3 for information) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, shingo_fujimoto@jp.fujitsu.com Meeting Date: 2014-03-05 Agenda Item: Access Control in protocol

2 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control Introduction That is not clear yet how to implement 2- levels access control which is introduced in ArchTS This contribution proposed how we can implement 2 level of access control on HTTP considering best practices found in real world. 2

3 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control 2-levels Access Control Model AE Local CSE IN-CSE Hosting CSE Check if AE is registered Check if AE is authorized to access resource Mca Mcc 3

4 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control (High Level) Proposal Introduce token-based access control mechanism for HTTP Protocol binding as well as traditional password-based access control OAuth2 specification should be considered as the solution for HTTP protocol binding for access control mechanism 4

5 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control [FYI] Access Control for HTTP Basic Authentication – Widely used to authenticate identity with pre- shared secret (=password) Bearer Authorization [RFC6750] – Widely used to carry the access token data which can work with OAuth2 based systems 5

6 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control Proposal on implementation Local CSE will behave as proxy-server AE will connect to Local CSE, and request to establish TLS connection to targeted Host by issuing CONNECT method. Targeted CSE may forward the request to 1- hop further CSE. The credential to pass the check if AE is registered to be carried by “Proxy- Authorization” header 6

7 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control [FYI] Communication Flow AE Local CSE IN-CSE hosting-CSE Establish TLS session CONNECT m2m.example.com:443 HTTP/1.1 Host: lcse.example.com Proxy-Authorization: CONNECT incse.example.com:443 HTTP/1.1 GET /cse3/foo/bar HTTP/1.1 Host: m2m.example.com Authorization: Bearer CONNECT hcse.example.com:443 HTTP/1.1 Reqs over TLS connction 7

8 © 2014 oneM2M Partners SEC-2014-0222-2-Levels_Access_Control Proposal WG4 member should consider on feasibility of proposed solution to implement 2-levels access control WG4 member should consider on required APIs to accommodate proposed solution. 8


Download ppt "2-levels Access control for HTTP binding Group Name: WG4 (& WG2/WG3 for information) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google