Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Indiana Department of Workforce Development 2008-09 Perkins Federal Report Secondary Core Indicator Results Statewide Results Local Performance Improvement/Sanctions.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Indiana Department of Workforce Development 2008-09 Perkins Federal Report Secondary Core Indicator Results Statewide Results Local Performance Improvement/Sanctions."— Presentation transcript:

1 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 2008-09 Perkins Federal Report Secondary Core Indicator Results Statewide Results Local Performance Improvement/Sanctions Changes/Future

2 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 2008-09 Statewide Results Indiana exceeded the AUL on all but one of eight indicators

3 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Local Performance

4 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 1S1-Language Arts

5 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 1S1-Math

6 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 2S1-Technical Attainment

7 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 3S1-Completion

8 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 4S1-Graduation

9 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 5S1-Placement

10 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 6S1-Nontrad Part

11 Indiana Department of Workforce Development 6S2-Nontrad Completion

12 Indiana Department of Workforce Development High Performing Locals There were two districts that met or exceeded on all eight of the indicators... AVD#18-Area 18 Career & Technical Education AVD#29-Parke-Vermillion Education/Training Interlocal

13 Indiana Department of Workforce Development High Performing Locals Only one district has met or exceeded on all indicators for the past three years. That district is: AVD#18 Area 18 Career & Technical Education

14 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Local Performance 14 AVDs met or exceeded on at least 7/8 indicators. 33 of the AVDs met or exceeded on at least 6/8 indicators But Ten of the AVDs only met or exceeded on three or less indicators.

15 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Steps to Improvement/Sanctions Improvement Plan Year 1 If the local fails the first year on an indicator, the State will notify them that an improvement plan must be implemented. At this point, the approved annual plan may be revised and funds redirected to affected core indicators. State staff will monitor implementation of the Annual Plan and provide technical assistance as requested.

16 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Steps to Improvement/Sanctions Improvement Plan Year 2 State staff will review performance results from Improvement Plan Year 1 to determine the level of improvement. If performance has not improved to meet or exceed the local AUL, staff may prescribe the use of local funds to address deficient core indicators.

17 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Steps to Improvement/Sanctions Improvement Plan Year 3 State staff will continue to provide technical assistance and monitor the recipient for improvements. If results from Program Year 3 do not show enough positive improvement, State staff may recommend that some or all of the basic grant allocation be redirected to an alternate provider with the capacity and expertise to provide services to the failing institution’s CTE students.

18 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Changes/Future NOCTI lists-by Friday? Mailing out by Friday New Spring Required Fields-DOB, Earned Credit?, STN checks for validity and accuracy, SSN or address * * FALL 2010 - Form 30A

19 Indiana Department of Workforce Development Thank you for all of your efforts!


Download ppt "Indiana Department of Workforce Development 2008-09 Perkins Federal Report Secondary Core Indicator Results Statewide Results Local Performance Improvement/Sanctions."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google