1. Deep Impact [Factor] Altmetrics from a PhD perspective Jon Tennant PhD student, Imperial College London Seeking employment

2. Who am I..? Palaeontologist by day, none of your business by night Interested in open science and science communication Not a huge fan of legacy publishers http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7794-0218 @Protohedgehog http://blogs.egu.eu/network/palaeoblog/

4. What are Altmetrics? A compliment to traditional metrics (e.g., citation indices) Enhance how we understand the re- use of research Highly variable – a ‘basket’ of metrics Four different categories: Scholarly activity (e.g Mendeley) Social activity representing brief engagements Scholarly commentary (expert blogs, Wikipedia) Mass media coverage Savage (2015) Scientists in the Twitterverse, Cell, 162(2), 233-234 Most publishers now employ some sort of altmetric measuring system

5. The scope of Altmetrics Development of a ‘persona’ for research and researchers Measures aspects of social influence Recognises need for public dissemination of research The role of social media in communicating science Most effective platforms for distributing research http://errantscience.com/blog/2015/07/08/how-to-measure-a- scientist/

6. Online science communication now kind of a big deal Each aspect can be tracked and measured Bik and Goldstein (2013) An introduction to social media for scientists, PLOS Biology, 11(4), e1001535

7. Altmetrics as a part of Open Science

8. Altmetrics as an essential tool for ECRs Blogging, tweeting etc. all now part of mainstream science How do you measure the success of these? Part of the ‘open science’ toolkit for researchers Goes beyond traditional measures of ‘impact’ An integral part of 21 st Century science

9. Impact factor disease http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact- factors/ http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.20 13.00291/abstract

10. HEFCE metrics report

11. The rising metrics tide

12. The HEFCE metrics report Everyone is sceptical about the use of metrics in assessment Metrics can’t replace peer-review as the primary mode of assessment Assessment requires a combination of qualitative and carefully selected quantitative indicators Metrics can be used to compliment narrative case studies The responsible use of metrics (which academics are great at..) Robustness Humility Transparency Diversity Reflexivity

13. What does the science say? arXiv articles show positive correlation between rapid citations and downloads and Twitter mentions (Shuai et al., 2012, PLOS ONE)Shuai et al., 2012, PLOS ONE Highly tweeted articles 11x more likely to be cited (Eysenbach, 2011, JMIR)(Eysenbach, 2011, JMIR Social media therefore either increases citations, or reflects qualities that predict citations, such as societal impact Twimpact factor! A ‘real-time’ impact metric? Different ‘flavours’ of ‘impact’ that capture different aspects of tools and audiences (Priem et al., 2012, arXiv)Priem et al., 2012, arXiv Positive but weak correlations between altmetrics and citations (Costas et al., 2014 arXiv) (early view)Costas et al., 2014 arXivearly view They capture different elements of the research dissemination process

14. Scopus article-level metrics Citation count and percentile benchmark Field-Weighted Citation Impact Mendeley readership count and benchmark Count of scholarly commentary (e.g., blog posts, Wikipedia) Count and benchmark of social activity (e.g., Twitter, Facebook) Total count of additional metrics and link to see breakdown by source

15. Do Altmetrics measure ‘quality’? What is ‘high quality’ research? What about journal and publisher brands, citation metrics, impact factors (ugh..), peer-review procedures..? How do you measure inspiration? Education? Creativity? Innovation? How do Altmetrics fit into this? Is ‘quality’ even measurable..? http://trianglesci.org/2015/05/15/the-qualities-of-quality/ The hyper-dimensionality of research Academic impact (e.g., originality rigour) vs societal impact (i.e., reach)

16. Afterthoughts/coffee discussion points Altmetrics don’t solve our problem about assessing ‘impact’ of research But they do help us to think more about its societal reach Go beyond what traditional metrics show about research re-use Have to use metrics responsibly The reality of academia National Information Standards Initiative – altmetrics for software and data? (details)details What can ECRs do? Sign DORA! (12,300 individuals, 570 organisations) Discourage use of impact factors Encourage use of altmetrics and social media Influence performance metrics at an institutional level

17. Thanks for listening!