1. Addressing Control Applications Using Wireless Devices Terry Blevins – Principal Technologist Mark Nixon – Manager, Future Architecture

2. Presenters Terry Blevins Mark Nixon

3. Agenda Background on WirelessHART Wirelesss Impact on Control Modified PID for Wireless Measurements Performance Comparison to Wired Transmitter Addressing Lost Communications Test results Conclusion

4. Control over Wireless For some applications it is desirable to utilize wireless networks for control –Cost reduction –New wireless measurements meets installation requirements WirelessHART –Designed to support monitoring and control applications –Use of wireless measurements in closed loop control automation may improve process operations.

5. Wireless Architecture OperationsAsset Management Plant Network Control Network Plant Network Wireless Standards: 802.11 802.16 802.11 802.16 Field Network 802.15.4 Wireless HART* Field Devices Control Network Asset Tracking Security Mobile Worker Self-Organizing Networks Focus:

6. 6 Network Manager WirelessHART Network Topology Wireless Field Devices –Relatively simple - Obeys Network Manager –All devices are full-function (e.g., must route) Adapters –Provide access to existing HART-enabled Field Devices –Fully Documented, well defined requirements Gateway and Access Points –Allows access to WirelessHART Network from the Process Automation Network –Gateways can offer multiple Access Points for increased Bandwidth and Reliability –Caches measurement and control values –Directly Supports WirelessHART Adapters –Seamless access fro existing HART Applications Network Manager –Manages communication bandwidth and routing –Redundant Network Managers supported –Often embedded in Gateway –Critical to performance of the network Handheld –Supports direct communication to field device –For security, one hop only communication

7. Gateway - Network Management Establishment of routes –The Network Manager is responsible for the creation of routes that can be used by plant automation hosts, gateways, other devices, and the Network Manager itself to perform communications with the application layer in network devices. –The Network Manager continually collects data from devices on the health of connections and traffic patterns and uses this information to adjust routing and scheduling. 7

8. Gateway - Network Management (Cont) Scheduling communications –The Network Manager is responsible for the establishment of communication schedule that the user layer application of a network device may use to transfer process data, alerts, diagnostics and other traffic to the gateway for access by the plant automation host. –For network devices that are actuators, interlocks, or any device that affects the process, the Network Manager is responsible for the establishments of scheduled communication that the plant automation host may use to send setpoints and outputs to the user layer application in field devices. 8

9. Example - Link Schedule 9 The top portion shows the overall slot allocations subdivided into channels. The bottom portion shows the transmit and receive slots for each device

10. Challenge – Control Using Wireless To reduce transmitter power consumption, it is desirable to minimize how often a measurement value is communicated. To avoid the restrictions of synchronizing the measurement value with the control, most multi-loop controller in use today are designed to over-sample the measurement by a factor of 2-10X. Also, to minimize control variation, the typical rule of thumb is that feedback control should be executed 4X to 10X times faster that the process response time, process time constant plus process delay. Thus, to satisfy these requirements, the measurement value in a wired system is often sampled much faster that the process responds

11. Traditional Approach – Over Sampling of Measurement Control Execution 63% of Change Process Output Process Input Deadtime (T D ) O I New Measurement Available Time Constant ( )

12. Fieldbus Foundation Approach - Synchronizing Measurement and Control Execution The approach taken in Foundation Fieldbus devices is to eliminate the need to over sample the measurement by synchronizing measurement with control execution. If the traditional approach is taken in scheduling control 4-10X faster than the process response, then the power consumption associated with the transmission of the measurement value each time communications are scheduled may be excessive for all but the slowest types of process. However, slowing down the control execution to reduce the power consumption associated with communication may increase control variability when the process is characterized by frequent unmeasured disturbances.

13. WirelessHART Solution Power consumption is minimized by transmitting the measurement value using the following rule: 1.The transmitter will periodically sample the measurement 4- 10x faster than the process response time. 2.The new value will be communicated as scheduled only if the magnitude of the difference between the new measurement value and the last communicated measurement value is greater that a specified resolution or if the time since the last communication exceeds a refresh time 3.Thus, the measurement is communicated only as often as required to allow control action to correct for unmeasured disturbances or changes in operation point.

14. Impact of Wireless Communication on Control Implementation The underlying assumption in traditional control design is that the PID is executed on a periodic basis. When the measurement is not updated on a periodic basis, then the calculated reset action may not be appropriate. If control execution is only executed when a new measurement is communicated, then this could delay control response to setpoint changes and feedforward action on measured disturbances. To provide best control when a measurement is not updated on periodic basis, the PID may be restructured to reflect the reset contribute for the expected process response since the last measurement update.

15. PID ENHANCEMENT FOR WIRELESS TRANSMISSION

16. Restructuring the PID for Wireless The positive feedback network used to create the reset contribution may be modified to accommodate non-periodic measurement update. Specifically, the filter used in this network can be modified to have the following behavior: –Maintain the last calculated filter output until a new measurement is communicated. –When a new measurement is received, calculate the new filter output based on the last controller output and the elapsed time since a new measurement value was communicated.

17. Filter Calculation To account for the process response, the filter output may be calculated in the following manner when a new measurement is received.

18. THE CLOSED LOOP RESPONSE OF MODIFIED PI CONTROLLER

19. CONTROL PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE Communications transmissions are reduced by over 96 % when the rules for wireless communication are followed. The impact of non-periodic measurement updates on control performance is minimized through the use of the modified PI algorithm for wireless communication.

20. PID Performance for Lost Communications The traditional PID algorithms provides poor dynamic response in the case of lost communications. Further modifications of the PID algorithm may be made to improve the dynamic response under these conditions When there is no communication lost, the new PID block acts exactly the same as a traditional PID block.

21. Modified PID for Wireless — PIDPLUS

22. Note: Controller output in the equation above is based on the actuator position feedback supplied by BKCAL_IN Integral Contribution – Calculated only on arrival of new measurement

23. Rate Contribution – Calculated on arrival of new measurement

24. Experimental Setup

25. PIDPlus Implementation

26. PIDPlus Expression

27. Experimental Scenarios Measurements Lost –Setpoint Change –Process Disturbance Actuator Commands Lost –Setpoint Change –Process Disturbance

28. Communication Loss Traditional PID Modified PID Measurement Communication Loss – During Setpoint Change

29. Communication Loss Modified PID Traditional PID Measurement Communication Loss – During Process Disturbance

30. Communication Loss Modified PID OUT PV & SP SP Traditional PID Actuator Communication Loss – During Setpoint Change

31. Communication Loss Traditional PID Modified PID OUT PV & SP SP Actuator Communication Loss – During Process Disturbance

32. Results in numbers Unreliable Inputs: Setpoint Change Unreliable Inputs: Process Disturbance Unreliable Outputs: Setpoint Change Unreliable Outputs: Process Disturbance PID372366196388 PIDPLUS169333190267 Scenarios PIDs IAE

33. Business Results Achieved WirelessHART transmitters may allow previously unavailable measurements to be made that enable close loop control to be implemented to improve plant operation.

34. Summary WirelessHART measurements may be used in closed loop control applications. Standard PID doesn’t perform well using non-period sample updates provided in a wireless environment The performance of PIDPLUS in a wireless control networks is comparably to PID using wired measurements PIDPLUS handles recovery after loss of communications.

35. References Mark Nixon, Deji Chen, Terry Blevins, and Aloysius K. Mok, “Meeting Control Performance over a Wireless Mesh Network”, The 4th Annual IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE 2008), August 23-26, 2008,, Washington DC, USA. Chen, Nixon, Blevins, Wojsznis, Song, Mok “Improving PID Control under Wireless Environments”, ISA EXPO2006, Houston, TX Chen, Nixon, Aneweer, Mok, Shepard, Blevins, McMillan “Similarity-based Traffic Reduction to Increase Battery Life in a Wireless Process Control Network”, ISA EXPO2005, Houston, TX

36. Where to Learn More Visit the Smart Wireless theater in the exhibit hall –Features 15 minute live demos of process, plant and business applications and showcases new wireless products and solutions Attend session 399: Smart Wireless Vision, Opportunities and Solutions –Presented by Dave Imming, Bob Karschnia, and Dan Carlson from Emerson Process Management –Gives an overview of Smart Wireless vision across all Emerson Process divisions –Covers strategy for the wireless field networks and wireless plant networks Attend any of the other 30 wireless sessions at Exchange Visit www.plantwebuniversity.com and take the 20+ wireless courses available onlinewww.plantwebuniversity.com Contact your local Emerson representative Visit www.emersonprocess.com/smartwirelesswww.emersonprocess.com/smartwireless

37. Where To Get More Information Smart Wireless Presentations at Emerson Exchange Websites –emersonprocess.com/smartwireless/ –PlantwebUniversity.com –http://www.hartcomm2.org/index.htmlhttp://www.hartcomm2.org/index.html Rosemount Wireless Specialist