Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarian Hutchinson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Evolution of PUI Distributions E. Möbius 1, B. Klecker 2, P. Bochsler 1, G. Gloeckler 3, H. Kucharek 1, P.A. Isenberg 1 1 Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans & Space and Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA 2 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany 3 Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA 1 Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans & Space and Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA 2 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany 3 Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Supported by NASA SR&T, STP, ACE, Prodex, Swiss NF, & DLR
2
Strong Variations in Pickup Ion Distributions Pickup Ion Distributions are Highly Variable Pickup Ions React to: - IMF Orientation (early Rollover) - IMF Strength (Compression and Rarefaction) - SW Density (Compression and Rarefaction) - Ionization rates & probably several unknown causes For Deduction of LIC Parameters Mitigation Sought with: - Long Integration Times Plan: Attempt to Understand Causes - Also Provides Handle on Ion Transport and Acceleration STEREO A,B & ACE Provide Simultaneous Observations Pickup Ion Distributions are Highly Variable Pickup Ions React to: - IMF Orientation (early Rollover) - IMF Strength (Compression and Rarefaction) - SW Density (Compression and Rarefaction) - Ionization rates & probably several unknown causes For Deduction of LIC Parameters Mitigation Sought with: - Long Integration Times Plan: Attempt to Understand Causes - Also Provides Handle on Ion Transport and Acceleration STEREO A,B & ACE Provide Simultaneous Observations
3
STEREO-A & STEREO-B He + Cone Observations in 2007 At STEREO-B: Cone has Double Peak At STEREO-B: Cone has Double Peak At STEREO A: Cone has Single Peak Cone appears narrower At STEREO A: Cone has Single Peak Cone appears narrower Phasing with SW Streams Determines Shape
4
STEREO-A & STEREO-B He + Cone Observations in 2007 He + relates to N sw, particularly at CIR compressions
5
STEREO-A He + Observations in 2007 & 2008 He + Peaks Related to J sw but not much better than with N sw Phasing with SW Streams Determines Shape Pickup Ions are Related to SW Density and Flux, but not the full story Sorting according to IMF Orientation doesn’t improve correlation
6
Additional Cone Variations Could Transport with IMF Play a Role? IMF Could Transport PUIs out of the Cone Different IMF Orientation Could Enable Varying Transport Implicit Assumption: PUIs ride with SW - But only part of the PUI phase space does Other phase space parts ride (along B) from different directions STEREO A&B April 1, 2007 approx. Parker ACE
7
Pickup Ion Phase Space Distribution and their Observation Assume Isotropic Distribution - Fast pitch-angle scattering - Adiabatic Cooling - Mapping of Neutral Source Assume Isotropic Distribution - Fast pitch-angle scattering - Adiabatic Cooling - Mapping of Neutral Source PUI PSD Centered on SW - V sw cut symmetric about SW - But not in flux! PUI PSD Centered on SW - V sw cut symmetric about SW - But not in flux! Observed PUI PSD - Integrated over ∆ & ∆E in SW Sector Observed PUI PSD - Integrated over ∆ & ∆E in SW Sector Good Agreement 1.4<w< 1.8! Differences: - At Cut-off - Near SW Good Agreement 1.4<w< 1.8! Differences: - At Cut-off - Near SW
8
Study of Variations Requires Baseline of Neutral Distribution and Mapping into PUI Distributions via Ionization & Cooling Start to Tackle this Issue! Previous Paradigm: Cooling is Completely Adiabatic Implies - Expansion as 1/r 2 for SW and IMF - Immediate Isotropization of PUIs Yet:- Evidence for Compressions & Decompressions - Evidence for Slow Scattering for PUIs How Can We Separate the Cooling Coefficient? Study of Variations Requires Baseline of Neutral Distribution and Mapping into PUI Distributions via Ionization & Cooling Start to Tackle this Issue! Previous Paradigm: Cooling is Completely Adiabatic Implies - Expansion as 1/r 2 for SW and IMF - Immediate Isotropization of PUIs Yet:- Evidence for Compressions & Decompressions - Evidence for Slow Scattering for PUIs How Can We Separate the Cooling Coefficient? Perplexing Variations of Pickup Ions - Impact of Ionization & Cooling
9
Influence of Ionization & Cooling PUI Distribution Determined by Ionization & Cooling: Along Inflow Axis Assume = 1.5 Assume = 1.2 PUI Distribution Determined by Ionization & Cooling: Along Inflow Axis Assume = 1.5 Assume = 1.2
10
Influence of Ionization & Cooling PUI Distribution Determined by Ionization & Cooling: Along Inflow Axis Use = 1.5 & 1.2 Assume = 1 AU (SolMax) Assume = 0.3 AU (SolMin) PUI Distribution Determined by Ionization & Cooling: Along Inflow Axis Use = 1.5 & 1.2 Assume = 1 AU (SolMax) Assume = 0.3 AU (SolMin) Requires Pickup Ion Data Over Full Solar Cycle Available from ACE SWICS!
11
Influence of Ionization & Cooling PUI Distribution Determined by Ionization & Cooling ACE SWICS PUI PSDs June 2001 & 2007 - Along Inflow Axis - 2001 = 0.85 AU (SolMax) - 2007 = 0.34 AU (SolMin) Use = 2.0, 1.5 & 1.2 in Model Looks Tantalizing! Acceptable V/V sw To Do PSD Integration!! PUI Distribution Determined by Ionization & Cooling ACE SWICS PUI PSDs June 2001 & 2007 - Along Inflow Axis - 2001 = 0.85 AU (SolMax) - 2007 = 0.34 AU (SolMin) Use = 2.0, 1.5 & 1.2 in Model Looks Tantalizing! Acceptable V/V sw To Do PSD Integration!!
12
Summary & Conclusions Interstellar He Cone Traversals with STEREO A & B Show remarkable substructure aligned with SW density enhancements, but neither SW density, flux, ionization and IMF variations explain all PUI variations Potential Culprits: a) Deviations from adiabatic cooling b) Transport effects not aligned with SW a) First attempt to separate effects of ionization rates and cooling behavior on PUI spectra appear to suggest a deviation from plain adiabatic dependence (w 3/2 ), but so far only pseudo phase space density evaluated b) ACE & STEREO Spring 2007 at 0.01AU along Interstellar He Cone Traversals with STEREO A & B Show remarkable substructure aligned with SW density enhancements, but neither SW density, flux, ionization and IMF variations explain all PUI variations Potential Culprits: a) Deviations from adiabatic cooling b) Transport effects not aligned with SW a) First attempt to separate effects of ionization rates and cooling behavior on PUI spectra appear to suggest a deviation from plain adiabatic dependence (w 3/2 ), but so far only pseudo phase space density evaluated b) ACE & STEREO Spring 2007 at 0.01AU along
13
Thank You! Support for this Project: - NASA SR&T - NASA ACE - NASA Solar Terrestrial Probes - PRODEX & Swiss National Foundation - DLR in Germany
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.