2. Convective Forecasting Issues in the Southwestern United States Monsoon Regime ChallengesMonsoon Regime Challenges Monsoon Climatology for Las VegasMonsoon Climatology for Las Vegas The Las Vegas Convergence ZoneThe Las Vegas Convergence Zone Classic Monsoon Regime PatternsClassic Monsoon Regime Patterns –Flash Flood Signatures (8 JUL 99) –MCS Signatures (7-8 AUG 97) Transition Case PatternsTransition Case Patterns –An organized SVR/FFW Event (10 AUG 97)

3. Monsoon Regime Challenges continual fluctuation between subtropical easterlies and polar westerlies poor sampling of short waves in easterlies relatively poor density of surface data typically low-shear environment (therefore, the primary ingredient = thermodynamics) storm-relative inflow of buoyant air may be as important as cold pool-shear balance… but usually difficult to assess accurately

4. The Monsoon Season in Las Vegas Thunderstorm Climatology suggests the “normal season” runs from about July 7 - Sept 11 with peak activity July 15 - August 15

5. Diurnal Summer Precipitation Frequency Most local thunderstorms occur in the mid to late afternoon with a secondary peak around midnight

6. Precipitation Amount at LAS Less than 1 percent of the total number of LAS summertime precipitation events exceed 0.25”

7. Exceptional Storm Totals 2.59” (8/21/57) 1.75” (8/10/42) 1.56” (8/12/79) 1.36” (7/28/84) 1.34” (8/17/77) 1.32” (7/24/56) 1.29” (7/24/55) 1.25” (7/26/76) 3.19” (7/8/99) Blue Diamond Ridge 3.13” (8/10/97) Boulder City 2.24” (9/11/98) Meadow Valley Wash 2.05” (7/19/98) Flamingo Wash 1.89” (9/11/98) California Wash At McCarran: Within Clark County:

8. Surface Dewpoint Trends Dewpoints on thunderstorm days average ~55 F and plateau or rise from late afternoon into evening; non-thunderstorm days normally remain < 45 F and decrease throughout the afternoon.

9. Surface Dewpoint Trends In contrast to the steady drying observed on non-thunderstorm days, dewpoints tend to rise substantially for 1-2 hours prior to the onset of a mid-afternoon thunderstorm at McCarran.

10. Surface Dewpoint Trends Similarly, midnight thunderstorms tend to be preceded by a noticeable increase in surface dewpoint during a period when the normal diurnal trend would suggest drying.

11. Southern Nevada Thunderstorm Days (average morning sounding parameters) deep, well-mixed elevated boundary layer 700-500mb lapse rate > 7 C km -1 surface-700mb theta-w > 17 C (mean mxr > 8 g kg -1 ) average 12Z CAPE only about 250-300 J kg -1 modest deep-layer (0-6km) shear propagation into valleys dependent on: mean wind in the cloud-bearing layer ambient vertical wind shear bouyancy of the surface inflow layer

12. Forecasting Problems DRA often not representative of LV valley model soundings typically not very valuable convective structure/evolution sometimes modulated by local circulations what buoyancy/shear values signal potential for organized convection vs. isolated storms? how can forecasters assess the influence of storm-relative inflow and internal feedback processes which alter the ambient conditions?

13. The Las Vegas Convergence Zone

14. Las Vegas Valley Orography

15. Reflectivity Image of LVCZ Event LV mesonet surface winds superimposed on KESX WSR-88D comp reflectivity, valid 2039 UTC, 30 July 1997.

16. Purpose of This Study u Reproduce classic LVCZ circulation in numerical simulations u Isolate important processes by systematic variations in wind and thermal profiles u Summarize findings for use in operational convective forecasts

17. RAMS Simulations u Initial real time simulations failed grid-scale convection overwhelmed signal horizontal resolution perhaps too coarse u Subsequent reruns successful inner nest contracted to 4-km turned off convection u Sole exception = dry simulation with no diurnal radiation cycle

18. RAMS Configuration u Non-hyd, 2-way interactive nest (12-km/4-km) u 25 vertical layers, 1-km NCAR terrain u 30-sec time steps, full microphysics u Mahrer-Pielke radiation, no convec. param. u First runs initialized with real data; lateral boundaries nudged toward Eta-29 or RUC u Second runs horizontally homogeneous; modified proximity sounding from DRA

19. Sounding Profile for HH Runs Mean 1-4 km wind ~ 230/06 ms -1

20. Surface Winds and Convergence: 1800 UTC

21. Tilt View of LVCZ Circulation Surface wind vectors and shaded terrain in bottom half of image. (LVCZ highlighted) Potential temperature contours and shaded U-component of wind in upper half of image. (vertical solenoid on lee-side of Mt Chuck highlighted by arrows)

22. Surface Winds and Convergence: 2100 UTC

23. Surface Wind & Relative Vorticity: 1800 UTC

24. 8/23 storm as it intersected CZ: VIL=30 kg m -2

25. 8/23 storm 12 minutes later (VIL = 67 kg m -2 )

26. Reflectivity Cross-Section: 2156 UTC (corresponds to time of 67 VIL)

27. Reflectivity Cross-Section: 2208 UTC (corresponds to 90kt downburst and 1-inch hail 3” deep)

28. Photo of downburst ~ 2210 UTC

29. 2100 UTC Surface Wind & Convergence with Mean 1-4 km Wind ~ 230/12 ms -1

30. 2100 UTC Surface Wind & Convergence with Mean 1-4 km Wind = 180/07 ms -1

31. 2100 UTC Surface Wind & Convergence with Mean 1-4 km Wind = 310/07 ms -1

32. Composite Reflectivity - 26 May 1999

33. Key Factors for Classic LVCZ Mean wind in the 1-4 km layer AGL: –direction between 200 and 280 degrees –speed less than 10 ms -1 (optimum ~5-7 ms -1 ) Deep, well-mixed unstable boundary layer elevated above a shallow, surface-based inversion in the early morning hours Surface dewpoints > 60 F (PW > 1.00”) Afternoon CAPE > 1500 J kg -1

34. Conceptual Diagram of the LVCZ life cycle.

35. Conclusions The classic LVCZ is the result of an interaction between the ambient wind and a thermally forced mountain-valley circulation under a specified range of prerequisite conditions. Range of conditions is now understood better and forecaster awareness raised; under such conditions, deep moist convection is likely and potential for explosive growth is substantially increased. Further study is required to develop more definitive parameters w.r.t. local effects of stability and minimum moisture needed to support deep convection in the Las Vegas valley.

36. Classic Flash Flood Signatures Illustrative Case: July 8, 1999

48. Organized Severe Storms Illustrative Cases: August 7-8, 1997

54. Eta 00h: 500mb flow & 700-400mb omega

55. Eta 06h: 500mb flow & 700-400mb omega

56. Eta 12h fcst: 500mb flow & 700-400mb omega

57. Eta 00h: CAPE, CIN, & 850mb Theta-e

58. Eta 06h: CAPE, CIN, & 850mb Theta-e

59. Eta 12h: CAPE, CIN, & 850mb Theta-e

73. 8/12Z GOES WV & RAMS 500mb Wind/Temp

74. Eta 00h 500mb flow & 700-400mb omega

75. Eta 06h 500mb flow & 700-400mb omega

76. Eta 12h 500mb flow & 700-400mb omega

77. Eta 00h CAPE/CIN & 850mb Theta-e

78. Eta 06h CAPE/CIN & 850mb Theta-e

79. Eta 12h CAPE/CIN & 850mb Theta-e

83. 8/21Z GOES VIS & SFC OBS

84. 8/23Z GOES VIS & SFC OBS

85. 9/00Z GOES VIS & SFC OBS

86. 9/00Z GOES-9 IR IMAGERY

87. 9/05Z GOES-9 IR IMAGERY

88. 9/09Z GOES-9 IR IMAGERY

89. KIWA 8/2303Z Composite Reflectivity

90. KIWA 9/0025Z Composite Reflectivity

91. KIWA 9/0300Z Composite Reflectivity

94. Organized Severe Storms: A Transition Case ~ 10 August 97 ~

97. GOES-9 Visible Image: 14Z - 10 Aug 97

98. GOES-9 IR Image: 19Z - 10 Aug 97

99. GOES-9 IR Image: 21Z - 10 Aug 97

100. 12Z Eta 00h 310K theta surface & mixing ratio

101. Eta 12h forecast 850mb theta-e & wind

102. GOES-9 Sounder CAPE: 20Z – 10 Aug 97

103. GOES-9 Sounder LI: 20Z – 10 Aug 97

104. Base velocity - 10/1922Z

105. Schematic of System Propagation

106. Composite Reflectivity: 2020Z – 10 Aug 97

107. Radar echoes & surface streamlines – 2030Z

108. VIL & Storm Track – 2020Z

109. VAD Wind Profile – 1922-2020Z

110. Composite Reflectivity: 2304Z – 10 Aug 97

111. Composite Reflectivity: 0047Z – 11 Aug 97

112. VAD Wind Profile 0024-0122Z

113. Storm Total Precipitation – 10 August 1997