Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008."— Presentation transcript:

1 Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008

2 Title I School Improvement Overview of Session  NCLB §1116 Title I School Improvement Requirements  WV School Improvement Trend Data  Title I School Improvement Funding Opportunities  Supplemental Educational Services (SES) State Evaluation

3 NCLB §1116 School Improvement Requirements After two or more consecutive years of not meeting AYP standards, the LEA shall:  Identify the school for improvement  Provide notice to parents of all students in the school  Develop or revise the school improvement plan  Ensure that 10% of the school’s allocation is utilized for professional development each year the school is identified for improvement  Provide technical assistance from LEA and SEA

4 NCLB §1116 School Improvement Requirements And, in addition, must offer the following sanctions:  Year two: Public School Choice (PSC)  Year three: PSC & Supplemental Educational Services (SES)  Year four: PSC, SES, and Corrective Action (CA)  Year five: PSC, SES, CA, & Planning for Alternative Governance  Year six:PSC, SES, CA, & Alternative Governance

5 NCLB §1116 School Improvement Requirements Year four and beyond: Defining Corrective Action The term “corrective action” means action consistent with State law, that substantially and directly responds to:  Consistent academic failure of a school that caused the LEA to take such action;  Underlying staffing, curriculum, or other problems in the school; and  Designed to increase the likelihood that each subgroup will meet or exceed the State’s proficiency levels of achiev ement.

6 NCLB §1116 School Improvement Requirements Year four and beyond: Corrective Action The LEA must choose at least one of the following:  Replace staff that is relevant to failure to make AYP  Institute and implement a new curriculum providing appropriate professional development  Significantly decrease management authority at school  Appoint outside expert to advise the school  Extend the school day or school year  Restructure the internal organizational structure of the school

7 NCLB §1116 School Improvement Requirements Year five and beyond: Restructuring Options The LEA shall implement at least one of the following arrangements:  *Reopen the school as a public charter school  Replace all or most of the school staff relevant to the failure of the school  Enter into a contract with an entity with a demonstrated record of effectiveness to operate the school  Turn the operation of the school over to the State  Any other major restructuring that makes fundamental reforms * *There are no charter schools in West Virginia. Therefore, this is not a viable option.

8 West Virginia Title I School Improvement Trend Data School Year SI Year 1 SC SI Year 2 SES SI Year 3 CA SI Year 4+ AG Total Schools 2005-0621131136 2006-076126125 2007-08636419 2008-09?????

9 West Virginia Title I School Improvement Trend Data School YearSchool Choice # of Participants Amount Spent for School Choice 2005-06296* 2006-07165$62,527 2007-08150** *No requirement to collect data ** Data compilation not completed Public School Choice

10 Title I School Improvement Funding Opportunities  NCLB §1003(a) requires each state to reserve 2% of Title I, Part A funding for fiscal years 2002-2003 and 4% for years 2004 through 2007 for the purpose of supporting school improvement efforts in identified Title I schools.  95% of this amount must be allocated to LEAs for specifically identified Title I improvement schools (school improvement, corrective action, restructuring) OR may, with LEA approval, directly provide for these activities or arrange for their provision through other entities such as school support teams or educational service agencies.  Remainder (or 5%) State Education Agency (SEA) technical assistance and support for LEAs with schools on Title I improvement status.

11 Title I School Improvement Funding Opportunities 2006-2007 SI Funding 1003(a) 14 grants @ $957,532 #Amount 10*$65,000 4**$76,883 *Awarded to Title I schools identified in years 1 and 2 of school improvement ** Awarded to Title I schools identified in years 3 and beyond of school improvement (i.e., corrective action, planning for alternative governance, alternative governance)

12 Title I School Improvement Funding Opportunities  NCLB §1003(g) requires the United States Department of Education to award grants to each state to provide sub-grants to LEAs for the purpose of providing assistance to identified Title I schools. These funds were available to states for the first time in the fall of 2007.

13 Title I School Improvement Funding Opportunities 2007-2008 SI Funding 1003(g) Competitive Grants 15 grants @ $756,156 #Amount Total 15$50,411$756,156

14 Title I School Improvement Funding Opportunities 2008-2009 SI Funding 1003(a) Technology Integration Specialist (TIS) Grants 16 grants @ $1,284,320 #Amount Total 16$80,270$1,284,320

15 Supplemental Educational Services (SES) State Evaluation  NCLB §1116(e)(4)(D) requires each state to develop, implement, and publicly report on standards and techniques for monitoring the quality and effectiveness of the services offered by approved SES providers, and for withdrawing approval from providers that fail, for 2 consecutive years, to contribute to increasing student academic proficiency.

16 Supplemental Educational Services (SES) State Evaluation  Bid for 2006-2007 SES Evaluation awarded to the University of Memphis  Baseline data has been collected  Inconclusive data due to small numbers of participating students

17 Supplemental Educational Services (SES) State Evaluation School YearSES # of Participants Amount Spent for SES 2005-06296* 2006-07165$205,957 2007-08150** *No requirement to collect data ** Data compilation not completed

18 Supplemental Educational Services (SES) State Evaluation  Subject to the bid process due to increase in contract amount ($40,000)  WVDE shares duties of SES evaluation with the awardee

19 Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioner Approval Issues 1) Title I School Improvement Funding Proposal (as mandated by NCLB §1003a) 2) Supplemental Educational Services (SES) State Evaluation (as mandated by NCLB §1116(e)(4)(D)

20 Thank you for your continuous contribution to improving the lives of children throughout West Virginia!

21 Contact Information: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator West Virginia Department of Education kdavies@access.k12.wv.us (304) 558-7805


Download ppt "Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google